Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T08:59:02.305Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The taxonomy of three species of the genus Procerodes (Platyhelminthes: Tricladida: Maricola)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Ronald Sluys
Affiliation:
Institute of Taxonomic Zoology, University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 20125, 1000 HC Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Extract

In the most recent monograph of the marine planarians Wilhelmi (1909) described only one new species, viz. Procerodes dohrni, which nevertheless was strikingly similar to P. lobata (Schmidt, 1861). More recently Den Hartog (1968) has described inadequately a rather similar species, P. ireneae, and the taxonomic status of these three species is now somewhat confused, making proper identification difficult. For the present paper the available material of these species has been re-examined with the view of elucidating their taxonomic status.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ball, I. R., 1979. The karyology of Procerodes lobata (Turbellaria, Tricladida, Maricola). Canadian Journal of Zoology, 57, 18201821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ball, I. R. & Reynoldson, T. B., 1981. British Planarians. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Benazzi, M., 1981. Debeauchampia anatolica n.gen. n.sp., a retrobursal fresh-water planarian from Turkey. Bollettino di zoologia, pubblicato dall ‘Unione zoologica italiana, 48, 107111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Böhmig, L., 1906. Tricladenstudien I: Tricladida Maricola. Zeitschrift fur wissenschaftliche Zoologie, 81, 344504.Google Scholar
Chandebois, R., 1954. Sur Procerodes dohrni Wilhelmi, triclade marine nouvelle pour la faune de France et les caractères qui la distinguent de Procerodes lobata O. Schmidt. Bulletin de la Société zoologique de France, 79, 134—137.Google Scholar
Den, Hartog C., 1968. Marine triclads from the Plymouth area. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 48, 209223.Google Scholar
De, Vries E. J., 1984. On the species of the Dugesia gonocephala group (Platyhelminthes, Turbellaria, Tricladida) from Greece. Bijdragen tot de dierkunde, 54, 101126.Google Scholar
Galleni, L., Nigro, M. & Puccinelli, I., 1984. The chromosome complement of Procerodes dohrni (Tricladida: Maricola). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 64,227231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galleni, L. & Puccinelli, I., 1979. The karyology of the genus Procerodes (Tricladida: Maricola) in British waters. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 59, 961967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galleni, L. & Puccinelli, I., 1986. Chromosomal evolution in marine triclads and polyclads (Turbellaria). Hydrobiologia, 132, 239242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcus, E. & Marcus, E., 1959. Turbellaria from Madeira and the Azores. Boletim do Museu municipal do Funchal, 12, 15—42.Google Scholar
Schmidt, O., 1861. Untersuchungen über Turbellarien von Corfu und Cephalonia. Zeitschrift für wissenschaftliche Zoologie, 11, 1—30.Google Scholar
Sluys, R., 1986. Taxonomic studies on marine triclads (Turbellaria, Tricladida, Maricola). Hydrobiologia, 132, 257262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilhelmi, J., 1909. Tricladen. Fauna und Flora des Golfes von Neapel, 32, 405 pp.Google Scholar
Wilhelmi, J., 1918. Über die Begründung eines hydrobiologischen Instituts am Bosporus, nebst Bemerkungen zur Tricladenfauna des Bosporus und Marmarameeres. Zoologischer Anzeiger, 50, 5964.Google Scholar
Zghal, F. & Tekaya, S., 1980. Sur les Turbellariés du golfe de Tunis. I. Etude morphologique. Archives de Institut Pasteur de Tunis, 57, 371384.Google Scholar