Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T08:46:03.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies on egg development and larval rearing of turbot, Scophthalmus Maximus L., and Brill, Scophthalmus Rhombus L., in the laboratory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

A. Jones
A. Jones
Affiliation:
Fisheries Laboratory, Lowestoft, Suffolk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Methods are described for rearing turbot (Scophthalmus maximus L.) and brill (Scophthalmus rhombus L.) to late larval stages; the major part of the work was done on the former species. Turbot were reared to 16–0 mm and brill to 17–0 mm in length. Rearing tanks ranged in capacity from 8 to 60 1. Turbotlarvae hatched at 2–7–3–0 mm and successful first feeding was established on rotifers (Brachionus plicatilis) at a length of 3–6–3–8 mm; larvae were transferred to a diet of Artemia nauplii at 5–6—6–0 mm. Experiments on the effect of temperature on growth and yolkabsorption rates in yolksac turbot larvae showed optimal growth efficiency at 15–0 °C. Delayed initial feeding reduced subsequent survival. Drawings of larval development of turbot and brill were made as an aid to their identification in plankton samples.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 52 , Issue 4 , November 1972 , pp. 965 - 986
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anthony, R. 1910. The cultivation of the turbot. Proceedings of the 4th International Fishery Congress, Washington, 1908, Pt 2. Published as Bull. Bur. Fish., Wash., Vol. 28, pp. 859–70 (transl. from the French).Google Scholar
Blaxter, J. H. S. 1968. Rearing herring larvae to metamorphosis and beyond. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 48, pp. 17–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaxter, J. H. S. 1969a. Experimental rearing of pilchard larvae, Sardina pilchardus. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 49, pp. 557–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaxter, J. H. S. 1969b. Development: eggs and larvae. In Fish Physiology, Vol. Il l (ed. W. S. Hoar & D. J. Randall), pp. 177–252. New York and London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Blaxter, J. H. S. & Hempel, G. 1963. The influence of egg size on herring larvae (Clupea harengus L.). J. Cons. perm. int. Explor. Mer, Vol. 28, pp. 211–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaxter, J. H. S. & Hempel, G. 1966. Utilization of yolk by herring larvae. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 46, pp. 219–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canu, E. 1893. Ponte, oeufs et larves des poissons osseux, utiles ou comestibles, observés dans la Manche. Annls Stn aquic. Boulogne, T. 1, pp. 117–32.Google Scholar
Cunningham, J. T. 1896. The Natural History of the Marketable Marine Fishesof the British Islands. 368 pp. London:MacMillan and Co. Ltd.Google Scholar
Dannevig, H. C 1895. On the hatching operations at Dunbar Marine Hatchery. Rep. Fishery Bd Scotl., No. 13, for 1894, Pt. 3, pp. 123–32.Google Scholar
Dannevig, H. C 1896. On the hatching operations at Dunbar Marine Hatchery. Rep. Fishery Bd Scotl., No 14, for 1895, Pt. 3, pp. 150–7.Google Scholar
Dannevig, H. C 1897. On the rearing of the larval and post-larval stages of the plaice and other flatfishes. Rep. Fishery Bd Scotl., No. 15, for 1896, Pt. 3, pp. 175–93.Google Scholar
Holt, E. W. L. 1891. Rhombus maximus, Linn, (the turbot). J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 2, pp. 399–404.Google Scholar
Jones, A. 1972. Marine fish farming; an examination of the factors to be considered in the choice of species. Lab. Leafl. Fish. Lab. Lowestoft, N.S., No. 24, 16 pp.Google Scholar
Kyle, H. M. 1921. The asymmetry, metamorphosis and origin of flatfishes. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B, Vol. 211, pp. 75–129.Google Scholar
Lasker, R.Feder, H. M.Theilacker, G. H. & May, R. C 1970. Feeding, growth, and survival of Engraulis mordaxlarvae reared in the laboratory. Mar. Biol., Vol. 5, pp. 345–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebour, M. V. 1918. The food of post-larval fish. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 11, pp. 433–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebour, M. V. 1919a. The food of post-larval fish. No. 2(1918). J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 12, pp. 22–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebour, M. V. 1919b. The food of young fish. No. 3 (1919). J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 12, pp. 261–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mcintosh, W. C 1895. Contributions to the life-historiesand development ofthe food and other fishes. Rep. Fishery Bd Scotl., No. 13, for 1894, Pt 3, pp. 220–35.Google Scholar
Mcintosh, W. C. & Masterman, A. T. 1897. Thelife-histories of the Britishmarine food-fishes, 516 pp. London: Clay & Sons.Google Scholar
Marr, D. H. A. 1966. Influence of temperature on the efficiency of growth of salamonid embryos. Nature, Lond., Vol. 212, pp. 957–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
May, R. C. 1971a. An annotated bibliography of attempts to rear the larvae of marine fishes in the laboratory. Spec, sci Rep. natn oceanic atmos. Adm. U.S. (Fisheries), No. 632, 24 pp.Google Scholar
May, R. C 1971b. Effects of delayed initial feeding on larvae of the grunion, Leuresthes tenuis (Ayres). Fishery Bull, natn oceanic atmos. Adm. U.S., Vol. 69, pp. 411–25.Google Scholar
Nellen, W. & Hempel, G. 1970. Beobachtungen am Ichthyoneuston der Nordsee. Ber. dt. Komm. Meeresforsch., Bd. 21, N.S., pp. 311–48. (English Abstract.)Google Scholar
Riley, J. D. 1966. Marine fish culture in Britain. VII. Plaice (Pleuronectes platessa L.) post-larval feeding on Artemia salina L. nauplii and the effects of varying feeding levels. J. Cons. perm. int. Explor. Mer, Vol. 30, pp. 204–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riley, J. D. & Thacker, G. T. 1969. New intergeneric cross within the pleuronectidae, dab x flounder. Nature, Lond., Vol. 221, pp. 484–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryland, J. S. & Nichols, J. H. 1967. Effect of temperature on the efficiency of growth of plaice prolarvae. Nature, Lond., Vol. 214, pp. 529–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shelbourne, J. E. 1964. The artificial propagation of marine fish. Adv. mar. Biol., Vol. 2, pp. 1–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shelbourne, J. E. 1967. A technique for mass-producing young sole (Solea solea) in hatcheries. ICES Pap. Rep. CM. 1967/E: 9, 7 pp.Google Scholar
Tomczak, G. & Goedecke, E. 1962. Monatskarten der Temperatur der Nordsee, dargestellt fur verschiedene Tiefenhorizonte. Dt. hydrogr. Z., ErganzHft., Reihe B (4°), Nr 7, 16 pp., charts.Google Scholar