Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:42:44.211Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Status and Ecology of Rhabdopleura Compacta (Hemichordata) from Plymouth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

A. R. D. Stebbing
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University College of Swansea

Extract

The first specimens of Rhabdopleura to be found were dredged by G.O. Sars from a depth of 120 fm (220 m) at Skraaven (Fig. 1) in the Lofoten Islands during 1866. They were mentioned in a fauna list by M. Sars (1868) as Halilophus mirabilis, and fully described by G.O. Sars (1872, 1874) as Rhabdopleura mirabilis. By that date AUman (1869 a-c) had described Rhabdopleura normani. His specimens had been dredged from 90 fm (165 m) off the Shetland Islands in 1868 by A. M. Norman and J. G. Jeffreys. Burdon-Jones (1954) gives the locality more precisely as:lsquo;… a depth of 93 fm at a point in the outer Haaf, some 40 miles east of Whalsey Skerries’ (Fig. 1). In 1880 Hincks described a third species which he named R. compacta because of its distinctive habit of growth. The habitat and locality were somewhat inadequately given as: ‘On shells from deep water; Coast of Antrim’ (Fig. 1). Hincks makes acknowledgement to Hyndman for dredging these shells (Hincks, 1880). From 1857 to 1859 Hyndman was serving on the Belfast Dredging Committee and it is possible that the specimens of R. compacta, which Hincks had discovered in material sent to him by Hyndman many years previously, were among the polyzoan collections known to have been made off the coast of Antrim. Hyndman (1858) included a list of polyzoa identified by Hincks, from deep water near the Maidens' Rocks. The following year Hyndman (1859) included a further list of polyzoa identified by Hincks, for which specific localities are not given.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allman, G. J., 1869a. Rhabdopleura normani, Allman, nov. gen. et sp. In (Norman, A. M.), Shetland final dredging report. Pt. II. Rep. Br. Ass. Advmt Sci. 1868, pp. 311–12.Google Scholar
Allman, G. J., 1869b. On Rhabdopleura, a new genus of Polyzoa. Proc. R. Soc. Edinb., Vol. 6, pp. 438–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allman, G. J., 1869c. On Rhabdopleura, a new form of Polyzoa, from deep-sea dredging in Shetland. Q. Jl microsc. Sci., N.S., Vol. 9, pp. 5763.Google Scholar
Bergersen, B. & Broch, H., 1932. Ordnung der Branchiotrema: Pterobranchier Ray Lankester 1877. 1. Rhabdopleuridae. Handb. Zool., Bd. 3, pp. 132.Google Scholar
Broch, H., 1927. Die pterobranchier Rhabdopleura. Deutsche Südpolar-Exped. 1901–3, Bd. 19, p. 468.Google Scholar
Burdon-Jones, C., 1954. The habitat and distribution of Rhabdopleura normani Allman. Univ. Bergen Årb. 1954, Mat. naturv., Nr. 11, pp. 1–17.Google Scholar
Dawydoff, C., 1948. Class des Ptérobranches. In Grassé, Traité de Zoologie, T. 11, pp. 454–89, Paris: Masson.Google Scholar
Eschalier, G. & Prenant, M., 1951. Inventaire de la faune marine de Roscoff. Trav. Stn. biol. Roscoff, N.S. 2, Suppl. 4, pp. 35–7.Google Scholar
Forster, G. R., 1954. Preliminary note on a survey of Stoke Point Rocks with self-contained diving apparatus. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 33, pp. 341–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forster, G. R., 1955. Underwater observations on rocks off Stoke Point and Dart mouth. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 34, pp. 197200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forster, G. R., 1958. Underwater observations on the fauna of shallow rocky areas in the neighbourhood of Plymouth. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 37, pp. 473–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harmer, S. F., 1905. The Pterobranchia of the Siboga Expedition. Siboga Exped., Vol. 26, 132 pp.Google Scholar
Hincks, T., 1880. History of British marine polyzoa, Vol. I, cxli + 601 pp., Vol. 11, 83 pl. London: Van Voorst.Google Scholar
Hyman, L. H., 1959. Hemichordata. The Invertebrates, Vol. 5, 783 pp. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Hyndman, G. C., 1858. Report of the proceedings of the Belfast Dredging Committee. Rep. Br. Ass. Advmt Sci., 1857, pp. 220–37.Google Scholar
Hyndman, G. C., 1859. Report of the Belfast Dredging Committee. Rep. Br. Ass. Advmt Sci., 1858, pp. 282–93.Google Scholar
Hyndman, G. C., 1860. Report of the Belfast Dredging Committee for 1859. Rep. Br. Ass. Advmt Sci., 1859, pp. 116–19.Google Scholar
John, C. C., 1931. Cephalodiscus. ‘Discovery’ Rep., Vol. 111, pp. 223–60.Google Scholar
Johnston, T. H., 1937. Rhabdopleura. Sci. Rep. Australian Antarct. Exp. 1911–14, Vol. 3, pp. 18.Google Scholar
Jullien, J., 1890. Description d'un Bryozoaire nouveau du genre Rhabdopleura. Bull. Soc. zool. Fr., T. 15, pp. 180–3.Google Scholar
Jullien, J. & Calvet, L., 1903. Bryozoaires provenant des campagnes de l'Hirondelle (1886–88). Résult. Camp, scient. Prince Albert I, T. 23, pp. 1188.Google Scholar
Kluge, H., 1948. On the occurrence of Rhabdopleura in the Barents Sea (in Russian). Trudy murmansk. biol. Sta., Vol. 1, pp. 276–83.Google Scholar
Lankester, E. R., 1884. A contribution to the knowledge of Rhabdopleura. Q. Jl microsc. Sci., Vol. 24, pp. 622–47.Google Scholar
Laubier, L., 1964. Découverte de la classe Ptérobranches en Méditerranée. C. r. hebd. Séanc. Acad. Set., Paris, T. 258, pp. 4340–2.Google Scholar
Laubier, L., 1966. Le coralligène des Albères. Monographie biocénotique, 316 pp., Paris: Masson.Google Scholar
Massy, A. L., 1925. The Brachiopoda of the coasts of Ireland. Proc. R. Ir. Acad., Vol. 37, pp. 3746.Google Scholar
Norman, A. M., 1903. Notes on the natural history of East Finmark. Polyzoa (continued) Ann. Mag. nat. Hist., Ser. 7, Vol. 12, pp. 87128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norman, J. R., 1921. Rhabdopleura. Br. Antarct. Terra Nova Exped. 1910 (Zool.), Vol. 4, pp. 95102.Google Scholar
Sars, G. O., 1872. On some remarkable forms of animal life from the great deeps of the Norwegian coast. I. Partly from the posthumous manuscripts of the late Professor Dr Michael Sars. Univ. Prog. 1869, Christiana, 82 pp.Google Scholar
Sars, G. O., 1874. On Rhabdopleura mirabilis (M. Sars). Q. Jl microsc. Set., Vol. 14, pp. 2344.Google Scholar
Sars, M., 1868. Remarks on the distribution of animal life in the depths of the sea (in Norwegian). Forh. VidenskSelsk. Krist., 1868, pp. 246–75.Google Scholar
Schepotieff, A., 1907a. Die Pterobranchier. Zool. Jb. (Anat.), Bd. 23, pp. 463534.Google Scholar
Schepotieff, A., 1907b. Die Pterobranchier. Zool. Jb. (Anat.), Bd. 24, pp. 193238.Google Scholar
Shrock, R. R., 1948. Sequence in layered rocks, 507 pp., New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Simon-Papyn, L., 1965. Installation expérimentale du benthos sessile des petits substrats durs de l'étage circalittoral en Méditerranee. Recl. Trav. Stn mar. Endoume, Bull. 39, pp. 5394.Google Scholar
Stebbing, A. R. D., 1968. Discovery of Rhabdopleura (Hemichordata) at Plymouth. Nature, Lond., Vol. 217, p. 1284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stebbing, A. R. D., 1970. Aspects of the reproduction and life cycle of Rhabdopleura compacta Hincks (Hemichordata). In the press.Google Scholar
Thomas, H. D. & Davis, A. G., 1949. The pterobranch Rhabdopleura in the English Eocene. Bull. Br. Mus. nat. Hist. (Geol.), Vol. 1, pp. 119.Google Scholar
Van Der Horst, C. J., 1928. Pterobranchier. Tierwelt N.- u. Ostsee, Bd. 7, pp. 1320.Google Scholar