Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T10:08:11.421Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Spatial and temporal distribution of harpacticoid copepods in Mondego estuary

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 June 2010

A.M.M. Gonçalves ,
M. De Troch ,
S.C. Marques ,
M.A. Pardal  and
U.M. Azeiteiro
A.M.M. Gonçalves*
Affiliation:
IMAR (Institute of Marine Research), Department of Zoology, University of Coimbra, 3004-517 Coimbra, Portugal
M. De Troch
Affiliation:
Ghent University, Department of Biology, Marine Biology Section, Campus Sterre, Krijgslaan 281-S8, B-9000 Gent, Belgium
S.C. Marques
Affiliation:
IMAR (Institute of Marine Research), Department of Zoology, University of Coimbra, 3004-517 Coimbra, Portugal
M.A. Pardal
Affiliation:
IMAR (Institute of Marine Research), Department of Zoology, University of Coimbra, 3004-517 Coimbra, Portugal
U.M. Azeiteiro
Affiliation:
Universidade Aberta (UAb), Portugal and IMAR (Institute of Marine Research), Department of Zoology, University of Coimbra, 3004-517 Coimbra, Portugal
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: A.M.M. Gonçalves, IMAR (Institute of Marine Research), Department of Zoology, University of Coimbra, 3004-517 Coimbra, Portugal email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Seasonal and spatial variations in the composition and relative contribution of the harpacticoid species in the Mondego estuary (western Portugal) were studied based on a monthly sampling along a salinity gradient. These benthic harpacticoids were collected in the water column by means of a 63-µm plankton net. The influence of hydrological parameters (temperature, salinity, oxygen dissolved concentration, pH, turbidity, chlorophyll-a, total suspended solids and nutrient concentrations) was analysed by means of a redundancy data analysis. In addition, this is the first study to provide a checklist of benthic harpacticoids from this estuary. In total, 13 species plus six species not yet identified but known to belong to the genus Canuella, Microsetella, Ectinosoma, Mesochra, Harpacticus and Parapseudoleptomesochra were identified. Copepodites and adults of Euterpina acutifrons and Paronychocamptus nanus were most abundant in this harpacticoid community. While P. nanus dominated in winter and spring at upstream stations, E. acutifrons dominated more downstream. Although this species occurred along the whole salinity gradient, its highest abundances were found in the north arm of the estuary, except in autumn. This distribution may be due to the adaptability of E. acutifrons to different environments and the intermediate position between marine and estuarine conditions assigned to this species. Paraleptastacus cfr. spinicauda showed a relative occurrence of 5–10% in all stations, except at the mouth of the estuary (M). Tachidius discipes was found in low densities in Mondego estuary in spite of the large numbers of copepodites of this species in the southern arm, characterized by a high level of total suspended solids. The northern arm of the estuary was characterized by a higher numerical occurrence of harpacticoid organisms throughout the study years, with the higher densities towards the freshwater part (upstream areas). Canuella sp., Ectinosoma sp. (copepodite), Ectinosoma melaniceps, Leptocaris brevicornis, Phyllognathopus viguieri, Microsetella norvegica (copepodite) and Macrosetella gracilis (copepodite) were considered rare species. Nonetheless harpacticoid species were represented by a higher number of adults in the northern arm, and juveniles in the southern arm.

Keywords

Harpacticoida seasonal and spatial variationhydrological parametersestuary
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 90 , Issue 7 , November 2010 , pp. 1279 - 1290
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

APHA (1995) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 19th edition.Washington, DC: American Public Health Association.Google Scholar
Azeiteiro, U.M.M., Marques, J.C. and Ré, P. (1999) Zooplankton annual cycle in the Mondego river estuary (Portugal). Arquivos Museu Bocage, Nova Série 3, 239–263.Google Scholar
Bell, S.S., Walters, K. and Hall, M.O. (1987) Habitat utilization by harpacticoid copepods: a morphometric approach. Marine Ecology Progress Series 35, 59–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodin, P. (1997) Catalogue of the new marine Harpacticoid Copepods. Documents de Travail de l'Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique 89, 1–304.Google Scholar
Boxshall, G.A. and Halsey, S.H. (2004) An introduction to copepod diversity. London: The Ray Society.Google Scholar
Buffan-Dubau, E. and Carman, K.R. (2000) Diel feeding behavior of meiofauna and their relationships with microalgal resources. Limnology and Oceanography 45, 381–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calbet, A., Garrido, S., Saiz, E., Alcaraz, M. and Duarte, C.M. (2001) Annual zooplankton succession in coastal NW Mediterranean waters: the importance of the smaller size fractions. Journal of Plankton Research 23, 319–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardoso, P.G., Brandão, A., Pardal, M.A., Raffaelli, D. and Marques, J.C. (2005) Resilience of Hydrobia ulvae populations to anthropogenic and natural disturbance. Marine Ecology Progress Series 289, 191–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardoso, P.G., Raffaeli, D., Lillebø, A.I., Verdelhos, T. and Pardal, M.A. (2008) The impact of extreme flooding events and anthropogenic stressors on the macrobenthic communities' dynamics. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 76, 553–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardoso, P.G.M., Pardal, M.A., Lillebø, A.I., Ferreira, S.M., Raffaelli, D. and Marques, J.C. (2004) Dynamics change in seagrass assemblages under eutrophication and implication for recovery. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 302, 233–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, K.R. and Warwick, R.M. (2001) Change in marine communities. an approach to statistical analyses and interpretation, 2nd edition.Plymouth: Primer-E.Google Scholar
Cornils, A., Schnack-Schiel, S.B., Al-Najjar, T., Badran, M.I., Rasheed, M., Manasreh, R. and Richter, C. (2007) The seasonal cycle of the epipelagic mesozooplankton in the northern Gulf of Aqaba (Red Sea). Journal of Marine Systems 68, 278–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Troch, M., Mees, J. and Wakwabi, E. (1998) Diets of abundant fishes from beach seine catches in seagrass beds of a tropical bay (Gazi Bay, Kenya). Belgian Journal of Zoology 128, 135–154.Google Scholar
De Troch, M., Vandepitte, L., Raes, M., Suárez-Morales, E. and Vincx, M. (2005) A field colonization experiment with meiofauna and seagrass mimics: effects of time, distance and leaf surface area. Marine Biology 148, 73–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolbeth, M., Cardoso, P.G., Ferreira, S.M., Verdelhos, T., Raffaelli, D. and Pardal, M.A. (2007) Anthropogenic and natural disturbance effects on a macrobenthic estuarine community over a 10-year period. Marine Pollution Bulletin 54, 576–585.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fiers, F. (1995) New Tetragonicipitidae (Copepoda, Harpacticoida) from the Yucatecan continental shelf (México), including a revision of the genus Diagoniceps Willey. Bulletin de l'Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles Belgique 65, 151–236.Google Scholar
Fiers, F. (1996) Redescription of Enhydrosoma lacunae Jakubisiak, 1933 (Copepoda: Harpacticoida) with comments on the Enhydrosoma species reported from west Atlantic localities, and a discussion of cletodid development. Sarsia 81, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleeger, J.W. and Clark, D.R. (1979) A revised key to Leptocaris (Copepoda: Harpacticoida), including a new species from a shallow estuarine lake in Louisiana, USA. Northeast Gulf Science 3, 53–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galhano, M.H. (1968) Two new interstitial Ameiridae (Copepoda Harpacticoidea) from Portugal. In Anais da Faculdade de Ciências do Porto. Porto: Imprensa Portuguesa, pp. 1–22.Google Scholar
Gonçalves, F., Ribeiro, R. and Soares, A.M.V.M. (2003) Comparison between two lunar situations on emission and larval transport of decapods larvae in the Mondego estuary (Portugal). Acta Oecologica 24S, S183–S190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huys, R. and Boxshall, G.A. (1991) Copepod evolution. London: The Ray Society.Google Scholar
Huys, R., Gee, J.M., Moore, C.G. and Hammond, R. (1996) Marine and brackish water harpacticoid copepods. Part 1. Synopses of the British Fauna (New Series) 51, 1–353.Google Scholar
Kršinić, F. and Grbec, B. (2002) Some distributional characteristics of small zooplankton at two stations in Otranto Strait (Eastern Mediterranean). Hydrobiologia 482, 119–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lang, K. (1948) Monographie der Harpacticiden. Lund, Sweden: Nordiska Bokhandeln.Google Scholar
Lang, K. (1965a) Copepoda Harpacticoida from the Californian Pacific coast. Lund, Sweden: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Lang, K. (1965b) Copepoda Harpacticoida from the Californian Pacific coast. Kunglige Svenska Vetenskapsakademiens Handlingar, Fjarde Serien 10, 1–560.Google Scholar
Limnologisk Metodik (1992) Ferskvandsbiologisk Laboratorium. Københavns Universitet (ed.), Akademisk Forlag, København.Google Scholar
Marques, J.C., Graça, M.A. and Pardal, M.A. (2002) Introducing the Mondego River Basin. In Pardal, M.A., Marques, J.C. and Graça, M.A.S. (eds) Aquatic ecology of the Mondego River Basin. Global importance of local experience. Coimbra: Imprensa da Universidade, Coimbra, pp. 7–12.Google Scholar
Marques, S.C., Azeiteiro, U.M., Leandro, S.M., Queiroga, H., Primo, A.L., Viegas, I. and Pardal, M.A. (2008) Predicting zooplankton response to environmental changes in a temperate estuarine ecosystem. Marine Biology 155, 531–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marques, S.C., Azeiteiro, U.M., Marques, J.C., Neto, J.M. and Pardal, M.A. (2006) Zooplankton and ichthyoplankton communities in a temperate estuary: spatial and temporal patterns. Journal of Plankton Research 28, 297–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marques, S.C., Pardal, M.A., Pereira, M.J., Gonçalves, F., Marques, J.C. and Azeiteiro, U.M. (2007) Zooplankton distribution and dynamics in a temperate shallow estuary. Hydrobiologia 587, 213–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgado, F.M.R. (1997) Ecologia do Zooplâncton da Ria de Aveiro–Caracterização Espacio-temporal, transporte longitudinal e dinâmica tidal, nictemeral e lunar. PhD thesis. University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal.Google Scholar
Noodt, W. and Galhano, M.H. (1969) Studien an Crustacea Subterranea (Isopoda, Syncarida, Copepoda) aus dem Norden Portugals. In Anais da Faculdade de Ciências do Porto. Porto: Imprensa Portuguesa, pp. 1–74.Google Scholar
Pardal, M.A., Marques, J.C., Metelo, I., Lillebø, A.I. and Flindt, M.R. (2000) Impact of eutrophication on the life cycle, population dynamics and production of Ampithoe valida (Amphipoda) along an estuarine spatial gradient (Mondego estuary, Portugal). Marine Ecology Progress Series 196, 207–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, T.R., Maita, Y. and Lally, C.M. (1985) Pigments. In Parsons, T.R., Maita, Y. and Lally, C.M.A manual of chemical and biological methods for seawater analysis. Oxford: Pergamon Press, pp. 101–104.Google Scholar
Pesce, G.L. (1981) A new harpacticoid from phreatic waters of Morocco, and remarks on the genus Praeleptomesochra Lang (Crustacea Copepoda: Ameiridae). Bulletin Zoologisch Museum 8, 9, 69–72.Google Scholar
Portuguese Water Institute (Instituto da Água) (2008) http://snirh.inag.pt (accessed in December 2008).Google Scholar
Portuguese Weather Institute (Instituto de Meteorologia) (2008) http://web.meteo.pt (accessed in December 2008).Google Scholar
Primo, A.L., Azeiteiro, U.M., Marques, S.C., Martinho, F. and Pardal, M.A. (2009) Changes in zooplankton diversity and distribution pattern under varying precipitation regimes in a southern temperate estuary. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 82, 341–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richmond, E.C., Wethey, D.S. and Woodin, S.A. (2007) Climate change and increased environmental variability: demographic responses in an estuarine harpacticoid copepod. Ecological Modelling 209, 189–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roff, D. (1992) The evolution of life histories: theory and analysis. London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
Roman, M.R., Gauzens, A.I., Rhinenart, W.K. and White, J.R. (1993) Effects of low oxygen waters on Chesapeake Bay zooplankton. Limnology and Oceanography 38, 1603–1614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutledge, P.A. and Fleeger, J.W. (1993) Abundance and seasonality of meiofauna, including harpacticoid copepod species, associated with stems of the salt-marsh cord grass, Spartina alterniflora. Estuaries 16, 760–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siokou-Frangou, I. and Papathanassiou, E. (1991) Differentiation of zooplankton populations in a polluted area. Marine Ecology Progress Series 76, 41–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strickland, J.D.H. and Parsons, T.R. (1972) A practical handbook of seawater analysis, 2nd edition. Fisheries Research Board of Canada Bulletin 167, 1–311.Google Scholar
Suárez-Morales, E., De Troch, M. and Fiers, F. (2006) A checklist for the marine Harpacticoida (Copepoda) of the Caribbean Sea. Zootaxa 1285, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suárez-Morales, E., Reid, J.W. and Gasca, R. (2000) Free living marine and freshwater Copepoda (Crustacea) from Mexico. In Llorente-Bousquets, J., Aldrete, A.N.G. and Soriano, E.G. (eds) Biodiversidad, taxonomía y biogeografia de Artrópodos de México. Hacia una síntesis de su conocimiento, 2. CONABIO/UNAM, Mexico, pp. 171–190.Google Scholar
ter Braak, C.J.F. and Smilauer, P. (1998) CANOCO Reference Manual and User's Guide to Canoco for Windows: Software for Canonical Community Ordination (version 4). Ithaca, New York: Microcomputer Power.Google Scholar
Thistle, D. and Eckman, J.E. (1988) Response of harpacticoid copepods to habitat structure at a deep-sea site. Hydrobiologia 167/168, 143–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uriarte, I. and Villate, F. (2004) Effects of pollution on zooplankton abundance and distribution in two estuaries of the Basque coast (Bay of Biscay). Marine Pollution Bulletin 49, 220–228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Uriarte, I. and Villate, F. (2005) Differences in the abundance and distribution of copepods in two estuaries of the Basque coast (Bay of Biscay) in relation to pollution. Journal of Plankton Research 27, 863–874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verdelhos, T., Neto, J.M., Marques, J.C. and Pardal, M.A. (2005) The effects of eutrophication abatement on the bivalve Scrobicularia plana. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 63, 261–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villate, F. (1997) Tidal influences on zonation and occurrence of resident and temporary zooplankton in a shallow system (estuary of Mundaka, Bay of Biscay). Scientia Marina 61, 173–188.Google Scholar
Walters, K. and Bell, S.S. (1994) Significance of copepod emergence to benthic, pelagic and phytal linkages in a subtidal seagrass bed. Marine Ecology Progress Series 107, 237–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, J.B.J. (2007) An annotated checklist and keys to the species of Copepoda Harpacticoida (Crustacea). Auckland: Magnolia Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar