Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T04:33:39.823Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Some Observations on Evadne Nordmanni Lovén

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

V. Bainbridge
Affiliation:
From the Marine Station, Millport

Extract

During 1951 Evadne nordmanni was present in the Clyde plankton from late February to the end of October and was most abundant during May and early June. The bulk of the population was always found in the top 30 m. Reproduction is mainly parthenogenetic; sexual individuals first appeared in May and sexual reproduction was most intense during October.

The relation between maternal size and stage of embryonic development is described. Sexual females showing the formation of a resting egg are large and have previously produced at least one brood by parthenogenesis.

Of the females with embryos at an early stage of development the primiparae have smaller broods than larger and older individuals. During the development of embryos some may be resorbed and in the primiparae this results in a decrease of embryo number with increase of size. Larger individuals tend to produce larger broods of young.

There was a considerable decrease of size from June to July and a partial recovery in August. These fluctuations follow similar fluctuations in embryo production.

The reproductive capacity of the parthenogenetic females and the intensity of sexual reproduction did not show any clear relationship, though there are indications that the latter is favoured by moderate rather than severe depression.

Food organisms are captured only during the hours of daylight. Evadne appears to be a selective feeder the diet of which consists mainly of tintinnids and peridinians.

Several aspects of the biology of the species are discussed with reference to the findings on the food and feeding habits.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1958

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Apstein, C 1910. Rapport sur les especes du plankton. Cladocera. Bull. Crois. per. Explor. Mer, Resume Vol. (1902–8), Pt. I, pp. 3951.Google Scholar
Baker, H. M. 1938. Studies on the Cladocera of Monterey Bay. Proc. Calif. Acad. Sci., Ser. 4, Vol. 23, pp. 311–65.Google Scholar
Berg, K. 1931. Studies on the genus Daphnia O. F. Mutter with especial reference to the mode of reproduction. Vidensk. Medd. dansk naturh. Foren. Kbh., Bd. 92, pp. 1222.Google Scholar
Berg, k. 1936. Reproduction and depression in the Cladocera illustrated by the weight of the animals. Arch. Hydrobiol., Bd. 30, pp. 438–62.Google Scholar
Cheng, C 1947. On the fertility of marine Cladocera with a note on the formation of the resting egg in Evadne nordmanni Loven and Podon intermedium Lilljeborg. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 26, pp. 551–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, G. L. & Bumpus, D. F. 1940. The Plankton Sampler-an instrument for quantitative plankton investigations. Spec. Publ. limnol. Soc. Amer., No. 5, pp. 118.Google Scholar
Conover, S. A. 1956. Oceanography of Long Island Sound, 1952–1954. IV. Phytoplankton. Bull. Bingham oceanogr. Coll., Vol. 15, pp. 62112.Google Scholar
Dakin, W. J. & Colefax, A. 1933. The marine plankton of the coastal waters of New South Wales. Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W., Vol. 58, pp. 186222.Google Scholar
Deevey, G. B. 1956. Oceanography of Long Island Sound, 1952–1954. V. Zoo-plankton. Bull. Bingham oceanogr. Coll., Vol. 15, pp. 113–55.Google Scholar
Digby, P. S. B. 1953. Plankton production in Scoresby Sound, E. Greenland. J. Anim. Ecol., Vol. 22, pp. 289322.Google Scholar
Green, J. 1954. Size and reproduction in Daphnia magna (Crustacea: Cladocera). Proc. zool. Soc. Lond., Vol. 124, pp. 535–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, j. 1955. Studies on a population of Daphnia magna. J. Anim. Ecol., Vol. 24, pp. 8497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, j. 1956. Growth, size and reproduction in Daphnia (Crustacea: Cladocera). Proc. zool. Soc. Lond., Vol. 126., pp. 173204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jorgensen, O. M. 1933. On the marine Cladocera from the Northumbrian plankton. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 19, pp. 177266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuttner, O. 1911. Mitteilungen iiber marine Cladoceren. S.B. Ges. naturf. Fr Berl., Bd. 2, pp; 8493.Google Scholar
Lebour, M. V. 1922. The food of plankton organisms. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 12, pp. 644–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lohmann, H. 1908. Untersuchungen zur Festellung des vollstandigen Gehalts des Meeres an Plankton. Wiss. Meeresuntersuch. Kiel Bd. 10, pp. 129320.Google Scholar
Lüucke, Fr. 1912. Quantitative Untersuchungen an dem Plankton bei dem Feuerschiff' Borkumriff' im Jahr 1910. Wiss. Meeresuntersuch. Kiel, Bd. 14, pp. 103–28.Google Scholar
Marshall, S. M. 1925. A survey of the Clyde plankton. Proc. roy. Soc. Edinb., Vol. 45, pp. 117–41.Google Scholar
Marshall, S. M. 1947. An experiment in marine fish cultivation. III. The plankton of a fertilized loch. Proc. roy. Soc. Edinb., Vol. 63, B, pp. 2133.Google Scholar
Rammner, W. 1930. Phyllopoda. Tierwelt N.- u. Ostsee, Lief. 18, pp. 132.Google Scholar
Russell, F. S. & Colman, J. S. 1931. The zooplankton. I. Gear methods and station lists. Sci. Rep. Gr. Barrier Reef Exped. Vol.2, pp. 535.Google Scholar
Stuart, C. A.Cooper, H. J. & Coady, H. 1933. Carbon dioxide as a sex-determining factor in Aioina macrocopa. J. exp. Biol., Vol. 10, pp. 4758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiborg, K. F. 1940. The production of zooplankton in Oslo-Fjord, 1933–1934. Hvalrdd. Skr., No. 21, 85 pp.Google Scholar
Wiborg, K. F. 1944. The production of zooplankton in a landlocked fjord. Rep. Norweg. Fish. Invest., Vol. 7, No. 7, 83 pp.Google Scholar
Wiborg, K. F. 1954. Investigations on zooplankton in coastal and offshore waters of western and northwestern Norway. Rep. Norweg. Fish. Invest., Vol. 2, No. 1, 246 pp.Google Scholar
Wiborg, K. F. 1955. Zooplankton in relation to hydrography in the Norwegian Sea. Rep. Norweg. Fish. Invest., Vol. 2, No. 4, 66 pp.Google Scholar