Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T17:10:22.615Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Some new and little-known serpulid polychaetes from the continental slope

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Eve C. Southward
Affiliation:
The Laboratory, Citadel Hill, Plymouth

Extract

Three new species, Paraserpula planorbis, Omphalopoma stellata and Spirorbis sarsiae, are described and three known species are redescribed. A list is given of the Serpulidae found between 100 and 1000 fm (approx.) and an appendix gives a key to genera of the sub-families Serpulinae and Filograninae

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Benham, W. B., 1927. Polychaeta. Nat. Hist. Rep. Terra Nova Exped., Zool., Vol. 7, pp. 47182.Google Scholar
Day, A. A., 1959. The continental margin between Brittany and Ireland. Deep-Sea Res., Vol. 5, pp. 249–65.Google Scholar
Day, J. H., 1955. The Polychaeta of South Africa. Part 3. Sedentary species from Cape shores and estuaries. J. Linn. Soc. Lond., Zool., Vol. 42, pp. 407–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Day, J. H., 1961. The polychaet fauna of South Africa. Part 6. Sedentary species dredged off Cape coasts with a few records from the shore. J. Linn. Soc. Lond., Zool., Vol. 44, pp. 463560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehlers, E., 1887. Report on the annelides. Reports of the U.S. survey steamer ‘Blake’. Mem. Mus. comp. Zool. Harv., Vol. 15, pp. 1333.Google Scholar
Fauvel, P., 1909. Deuxième note sur les polychètes provenant des campagnes de l'Hirondelle et de la Princesse-Alice ou deposes dans le Musée océanographique de Monaco. Bull. Inst. océanogr. Monaco, No. 142, pp. 179.Google Scholar
Fauvel, P., 1914. Annelides non pelagiques provenant des campagnes de l'Hirondelle et de la Princesse-Alice ou deposes dans le Musée océanographique de Monaco. Res. Camp, sci., Monaco, Fasc. 46, pp. 1432.Google Scholar
Fauvel, P., 1927. Polychètes sédentaires. Faune Fr., T. 16, pp. 1494.Google Scholar
Hanson, J., 1948. The genera Apomatus and Protula (Polychaeta Serpulidae). J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 27, pp. 581584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartman, O., 1951. Literature of the Polychaetous Annelids. Vol. II. Bibliography. Los Angeles: Olga Hartman.Google Scholar
Hartman, O., 1959. Catalogue of the polychaetous annelids of the world. Part II. Occ. Pap. Allan Hancock Fdn, No. 23, pp. 355628.Google Scholar
Hill, M. N., 1956. Notes on the bathymetric chart of the N.E. Atlantic. Deep-Sea Res., Vol. 3, pp. 229–31.Google Scholar
Jones, M. L., 1962. On some polychaetous annelids from Jamaica, the West Indies. Bull. Amer. Mus. nat. Hist., Vol. 124, pp. 169212.Google Scholar
Langerhans, P., 1884. Die Wurmfauna von Madeira. IV. Z. wiss. Zool., Bd. 40, pp. 247–85.Google Scholar
Le Danois, E., 1948. Les Profundeurs de la Mer. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
Mørch, O. A. L., 1863. Revisio critica serpulidarum, et Bidrag til Rørormenes Naturhistorie. Naturh. Tidsskrift, Kobenhavn (1861–63), Ser. 3, Vol. 1, pp. 140.Google Scholar
Pillai, T. G., 1960. Some marine and brackish-water serpulid Polychaeta from Ceylon, including new genera and species. Ceylon J. Sci., Biol. Sci., Vol. 3, pp. 140.Google Scholar
Pixell, H. L. M., 1912. Polychaeta from the Pacific coast of North America. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 1912, pp. 784805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roule, L., 1906. Annelides et géphyriens. Exped. sci. Travailleur et Talisman, 1906, pp. 1102.Google Scholar
Saint-Joseph, A. De, 1894. Les annelides polychètes des côtes de Dinard. III. Ann. Sci. nat. Paris, T. 17, pp. 1395.Google Scholar
Southern, R., 1914. Clare Island Survey. Archiannelida and Polychaeta. Proc. R. Irish Acad., Vol. 31, Sect. 2, Pt. 47, 160 pp.Google Scholar
Southward, A. J. & Southward, E. C., 1958. On the occurrence and behaviour of two little-known barnacles, Hexelasma hirsutum and Verruca recta, from the continental slope. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 37, pp. 633–47.Google Scholar