Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T19:12:17.285Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some Effects of Salinity on the Survival, Moulting, and Growth of Corophium Volutator [Amphipoda]

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Donald S. Mclusky
Donald S. Mclusky
Affiliation:
Natural History Dept., Marischal College, Aberdeencor1corresp
1
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

An experimental study of the effects of salinity on the mud-dwelling amphipod, Corophium volutator (Pallas), indicates that, if supplied with mud, it will survive the salinity range of 2.50 %0, and without mud the range 7.5-47–5 %0. Moulting occurred in salinities of 2.6–46 %0, but most frequently in the range 5–20 %0. Growth occurred at a maximum rate in 15.4 %0, and only slightly slower at 4.4 and 30.6 %0; but below 4.4 %0 the growth rate was progressively reduced. Freezing point studies show C, volutator to be a hyperosmotic regulator, having a tissue tolerance range of 13–50 %0. The importance of a supply of mud, and the significance of hyperosmotic regulation are briefly discussed.

INTRODUCTION

The amphipod Corophium volutator (Pallas) is an inhabitant of littoral muds, the populations often reaching high densities. It has been most commonly reported from shores of estuaries, although Zenkevitch (1963) has stated that it may also occur in muds submerged to a depth of 10 m. Segerstråle (1959) has summarized the data available on the occurrence and distribution of C. volutator. Since that date, work has been done on substrate selection (Meadows 1964a–c), on burrowing behaviour (Meadows & Reid, 1966) and on rhythmical swimming activity under tidal control (Morgan, 1965). Many authors (Nicol, 1935; Thamdrup, 1935; Beanland, 1940; Spooner & Moore, 1940; Rees, 1940; Goodhart, 1941; Stopford, 1951; Rullier, 1959; Gee, 1961) have described the substrate in which C. volutator occurs. They have agreed that C. volutator is found in mud or muddy sand, containing approximately 37 % silt or clay.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 47 , Issue 3 , October 1967 , pp. 607 - 617
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agrawal, V. P. 1963. Studies on the physiology of digestion in Corophium volutator. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 43, pp. 125–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beanland, F. L., 1940. Sand and mud communities in the Dovey estuary. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., 24, pp. 589–611.Google Scholar
Fox, H. M., 1952. Anal and oral intake of water by Crustacea. J. exp. Biol., Vol. 29 PP. 583–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, H. M.et al. 1926–29., Zoological results of the Cambridge expedition to the Suez Canal, 1924. Trans, zool. Soc. Lond., Vol. 22, pp. 1–865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gee, J. M., 1961. Ecological studies in South Benfieet Creek with special reference to the amphipod, Corophium. Essex Nat., Vol. 30, pp. 291–309.Google Scholar
Goodhart, C. B., 1941. Ecology of the amphipoda in a small estuary in Hampshire. J. Anim. Ecol., Vol. 10, pp. 306–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurjanova, E. F., 1951. Amphipods of the seas of the USSR and adjacent waters. Amphipoda-Gammaridea. Acad. Sci. USSR, Opredel. Faun. SSSR 41, 1029 pp.Google Scholar
Hart, T. J., 1930. Preliminary notes on the bionomics of the amphipod—Corophium volutator. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 16, pp. 761–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hellén, W., 1919. Zur kenntnis der amphipoden—Fauna Filmlands. Meddn. Soc. Fauna Flora fenn., Vol. 45, pp. 131–8.Google Scholar
Kinne, O., 1960. Growth, food intake, and food conversion in a euryplastic fish exposed to different temperatures and salinities. Physiol. Zool., Vol. 33, pp. 288–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinne, O., 1964a. Non-genetic adaptation to temperature and salinity. Helgolander wiss. Meeresunters. Bd. 9, pp. 433–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinne, O., 1964b. The effects of temperature and salinity on marine and brackish water animals. (2) Salinity and temperature salinity combinations. Oceanog. Mar. Biol. Ann. Rev., Vol. 2, pp. 281–339.Google Scholar
Lockwood, A. P. M., 1962. The osmoregulation of Crustacea. Biol. Rev., Vol. 37, pp. 257–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicol, E. A. T., 1935. The ecology of a salt marsh. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 20, pp. 203–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meadows, P. S., 1964a. Experiments on substrate selection by Corophium species—films and bacteria on sand particles. J. exp. Biol., Vol. 41, pp. 499–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meadows, P. S., 1964b. Experiments on substrate selection by Corophium species—Depth selection and population density. J. exp. Biol., Vol. 41, pp. 677–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meadows, P. S., 1964c. Substrate selection by Corophium species—the particle size of substrates. J. Anim. Ecol., Vol. 33, pp. 387–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meadows, P. S. & Reid, A., 1966. The behaviour of Corophium volutator. J. Zool., Lond., Vol. 150, pp. 387–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, E., 1965. The activity rhythm of the amphipod Corophium volutator, and its possible relationship to changes in hydrostatic pressure associated with the tides. J. Anim. Ecol., Vol. 34, pp. 731–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potts, W. T. W., 1954. The energetics of osmoregulation in brackish water and fresh water. J. exp. Biol., Vol. 31, pp. 618–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsay, J. A. & Brown, R. H. J., 1955. Simplified apparatus and procedure for freezing-point determinations upon small volumes of fluid. J. Sci. Instrum., Vol. 32, pp. 372–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rees, C. B., 1940. A preliminary study of the ecology of a mud flat. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 24, pp. 185–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, J. D., 1939. The inorganic composition of the body fluids of three marine invertebrates. J. exp. Biol., Vol. 16, pp. 387–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rullier, F., 1959. Etude de l'Aber de Roscoff. Trav. Stn biol. Roscoff., T. 10 pp. 9–346.Google Scholar
Segerstråle, S. G., 1959. Synopsis of data on the crustaceans Gammarus locusta, G. oceanicus, Pontoporeia affinis and Corophium volutator. Commentat. biol., Vol. 20 (5), 23 pp.Google Scholar
Shaw, J., 1955. Ionic regulation and water balance in the aquatic larva of Sialis lutaria. J. exp. Biol., Vol. 32, pp. 352–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spooner, G. M. & Moore, H. B., 1940. The ecology of the Tamar Estuary. VI. An account of the macrofauna of the intertidal muds. J. mar. Biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 24, pp. 283–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stock, J. H. & Vos, A. P. C., 1961. Einige wirbellose Tiergruppen des Dollart-Ems-Estuarium. Bijdr. Dierk., Vol. 30, pp. 63–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stopford, S. C., 1951. An ecological survey of the Cheshire foreshore of the Dee estuary. J. Anim. Ecol., Vol. 20, pp. 103–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thamdrup, H. M., 1935. Beitrage zur Okolgie der Wattenfauna auf experimenteller Grundlage. Meddr Kommn Havunders., (Ser. Fisk.), Bd. 10, pp. 1–125.Google Scholar
Yonge, C. M., 1953. Aspects of life on muddy shores. In Essays in Marine Biol., pp. 29–49. Ed. Marshall, Orr. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
Zenkevitch, L., 1963. Biology of the Seas of the USSR, 955 pp. London: George Allen and Unwin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar