Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:42:57.239Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Salinity Tolerances Of Some Common Prosobranchs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

D. C. Arnold
D. C. Arnold
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Mount Allison University, Sackville, New Brunswick, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The abundance of gastropods characteristic of rocky shores throughout the world (Southward, 1958) has encouraged investigation of their ecology and behaviour in several areas, although studies under laboratory conditions seem to have been restricted largely to the common European species Littorina littorea and Patella vulgata. Most investigations of littorinid behaviour have concentrated upon their response to light and gravity (see Newell, 1958, for a critique of earlier work), as the most important factors, after exposure, to influence life upon the shore. Variations in salinity are also significant, however, and ecological observations make it clear that littorinids are able to withstand a considerable range of salinity (Moore, 1958; Fretter & Graham, 1962; Newell, 1964; Green, 1968). But ecological studies alone do not necessarily reveal whether this capacity is to resist an adverse environment by a period of inactivity or, more particularly, to retain activity within a wide salinity range; nor do they show how far the potentialities of particular populations are related to the conditions under which they actually live. Examination of this aspect has been undertaken with L.littorea on the Atlantic coast of Canada (Gowanloch & Hayes, 1927) and with L.knysnaensis Philippi and other prosobranchs in False Bay, South Africa (Broekhuysen, 1940). However, these studies were restricted to determination of limiting salinities, without consideration of the extent to which activity occurred within the range of tolerance of the species concerned. Investigation of salinity tolerances in L.littorea is also of some general interest since, as pointed out by Newell (1958), the behaviour pattern of this species is probably fairly typical of the more mobile intertidal invertebrates.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 52 , Issue 2 , May 1972 , pp. 475 - 486
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arnold, D. C 1957. The response of the limpet Patella vulgata L., to waters of different salinities. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 36, pp. 121–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, J. H. – Yonge, C. M. 1958. PocketGuide to the Sea Shore. 272 pp. London: Collins.Google Scholar
Berry, A. J. 1961. Some factors affecting the distribution of Littorina saxatilis (Olivi). J. Anim. Ecol., Vol. 30, pp. 27–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bousfield, E. L. 1960. Canadian Atlantic Sea Shells. 72 pp. Ottawa: National Museum of Canada.Google Scholar
Broekhuysen, G. J. 1940. A preliminary investigation of the importance of desiccation, temperature and salinity as factors controlling the vertical distribution of certain intertidal marine gastropods in False Bay, South Africa. Trans. R. Soc, S. Afr., Vol. 28, pp. 255–92.Google Scholar
Fretter, V. & Graham, A. 1962. British Prosobranch Molluscs. 755 pp. London: Ray Society.Google Scholar
Gowanloch, J. N. & Hayes, F. R. 1927. Contributions to the study of marinegastropods. I. The physical factors, behaviour and intertidal life of Littorina. Contr. Can. Biol. Fish., Vol. 3, PP. 133–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, J. 1968. The Biology of Estuarine Animals. 401 pp. London: Sidgwick andJackson.Google Scholar
Harvey, H. W. 1957. Chemistry and Fertility of Sea Water, 2nd ed. 224 pp. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moore, H. B. 1958. Marine Ecology. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Moyse, J. & Nelson-Smith, A. 1963. Zonation of animals and plants on rockyshores around Dale, Pembrokeshire. Fid Stud., Vol. 1 (5), pp. 1–31.Google Scholar
Moyse, J. & Nelson-Smith, A. 1964. Effects of the severe cold of 1962–1963 upon shore animals in South Wales. J.Anim. Ecol., Vol. 33, pp. 183–90.Google Scholar
Muus, B. J. 1963. Some Danish Hydrobiidae, with the descriptionof a new species, Hydrobia neglecta. Proc. malacol. Soc. Lond., 35, 131–8.Google Scholar
Nelson-Smith, A. 1967. Marine biology of Milford Haven: the distribution of littoral plants and animals. Fid Stud., Vol. 2(4), pp. 407–34.Google Scholar
Newell, G. E. 1958. An experimental analysis of the behaviour of Littorina littorea (L.) under natural conditions and in the laboratory. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 37, pp. 241–66.Google Scholar
Newell, G. E. 1964. Physiological aspects of the ecology of intertidal molluscs. In Physiology of Mollusca, Vol. I (ed. K. M. Wilbur and C. M. Yonge), pp. 59–81. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Southward, A. J. 1958. The zonation of plants and animals on rocky shores. Biol. Rev., Vol. 33, pp. 137–77.Google Scholar