Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:52:02.650Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Revision of the Genus “Portunus” (A. Milne-Edwards, Bell, etc.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Richard Palmer
Richard Palmer
Affiliation:
Student Probationer at the Plymouth Laboratory
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. The characters of the species of “Portunus” are redescribed in detail and comparatively.

2. On the basis of the characters studied an attempt is made to determine the relationships of the constituent species, both within the genus and with allied genera, P. corrugatus and P. arcuatus, being regarded as the more primitive forms.

3. P. marmoreus and P. holsatus are separated by a large number of characters.

4. The status of various foreign, fossil and doubtful species is discussed.

5. An account is given of the present state of knowledge regarding the distribution of the species.

6. The synonymy of the generic name is considered at length.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 14 , Issue 4 , May 1927 , pp. 877 - 908
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1927

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alcock, A. 1899, a. An account of the deep-sea Brachyura collected by the … Investigator. Pp. 68–70, Calcutta.Google Scholar
Alcock, A. 1899, b. Materials for a carcinological fauna of India. No. 4, Part ii, Journ. Asiat. Soc., Bengal, LXVIII, 2, (i), pp. 1–104.Google Scholar
Balss, H. 1921. In:—Beitrage zur Kenntnis der Meeresfauna Westafricas, von W., Michaelsen, Bd. III, Lief. 2, pp. 56–57. Hamburg.Google Scholar
Balss, H. 1922. Beitrage zur Kenntnis der Meeresfauna Westafricas, Bd. III, Lief. 3, p. 98.Google Scholar
Balss, H. 1926. In:—Die Tierwelt der Nord-und Ostsee, von G., Grimpe und E., Wagler, Lief. VI, Teil X.h2, pp. 39–41.Google Scholar
Bell, T. 1853. A history of the British stalk-eyed Crustacea. London.Google Scholar
Blohm, A. 1915. Die Dekapoden der Nord- und Ostsee. In:—Wiss. Meeresuntersuch. Komm, z.wiss. Untersuch. d. deutschen Meere in Kiel. N.F. Bd. VII, Abt. Kiel, pp. 58–63.Google Scholar
Borradaile, L. A. 1900. On some Crustaceans from the South Pacific. —Part IV. The crabs. Proc. Zool. Soc., Lond., 1900, 2, pp. 576–78.Google Scholar
Borradaile, L. A. 1916. In:—British Antartic (Terra Nova) Expedition, 1910. Zoology, Vol. III, Arthropoda, p. 97. London.Google Scholar
Bouvier, E.-L. 1922. In:—Résultats scientifiques, Albert Ier. Fasc.. LXII, pp. 58–59. Monaco.Google Scholar
Carus, J. V. 1885. Prodromus Faunæ Mediterraneæ… Vol. I, pp. 516–18. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Doflein, F. 1904. In:—Wiss. Ergeb. deutsch. Tiefsee-Exp.. Valdivia, VI, p. 94.Google Scholar
Fabricius, J. C. 1798. Entomologia systematica… Supplementum.Hafnisæ.Google Scholar
Giard, A. 1887. La castration parasitaire. Bull. Scient. du Dep. du Nord., Tom. XVIII, pp. 9–11.Google Scholar
Hansen, H. J. 1908. In:—The Danish Ingolf-Expedition, Vol. III, 2. Crustacea Malacostraca, I, pp. 16–17. Copenhagen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heller, C. 1863. Crustaceen des südlichen Europa, pp. 80–90, 313–14. Vienna.Google Scholar
Huxley, J. S. 1927. Further Work on Heterogonic Growth. Biolog. Zentralbl., Bd. XLVII, pp. 151–163.Google Scholar
Kinahan, J. R. 1857, a. Nat. Hist. Review, Vol. IV, p. 51, Pl. IX.Google Scholar
Kinahan, J. R. 1857, b. On Xantho rivulosa and other Decapodous Crustacea… Nat. Hist. Review, Vol. IV, pp. 66–7.Google Scholar
Kinahan, J. R. 1857, c. List of the Podophthalmous Crustacea occurring in Dublin Bay… Zoologist, Vol. XV, p. 5716.Google Scholar
Latreille, P. A. 1810. Considérations générates sur … Crustacés, des Arachnides, et des Insectes. Paris.Google Scholar
Leach, W. E. 1815–1816. Malacostraca Podophthalmata Britanniæ. Tab. VI-VIII. London. (See Rathbun, below, 1897, p. 156.)Google Scholar
Lucas, H. 1849. In:—Exploration scientifique de L‘Algérie, Zoologie I. Hist. Nat. des animaux articulés, I, pp. 14–16. Atlas, Pl. 2.Google Scholar
Miers, E. J. 1879. On a collection of Crustacea… Corean and Japanese Seas. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 1879, pp. 33–4.Google Scholar
Miers, E. J. 1881. On a collection of Crustacea made … at … Senegambia. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. Ser. V, Vol. VIII, p. 219.Google Scholar
Miers, E. J. 1886. In:—Challenger Reports, Vol. XVII. Report on the Brachyura, pp. 199–201.Google Scholar
Milne-Edwards, A. 1861, a. Études Zoologiques sur les Crustacés récents de la famille des Portuniens. Arch. de Mus. d’Hist. Nat. Tom. X, pp. 309–428.Google Scholar
Milne-Edwards, A. 1861, b. Histoire des Crustacés podophthalmaires fossiles. Monographies des Portuniens et des Thalassiniens. Ann. Sci. Nat. Zool., Sér. IV, Tom. XIV.Google Scholar
Milne-Edwards, A., Et Bouvier, E.-L. 1894. In:—Résultats scientifiques, Albert Ier. Fasc. VII, pp. 24–8. Monaco.Google Scholar
Milne-Edwards, A., Et Bouvier, E.-L. 1899. In:—Resultats scientifiques, Albert Ier. Fasc. XIII, pp. 25–7.Google Scholar
Milne-Edwards, H. 1834. Histoire Naturelle des Crustacés. Tom. I, pp. 432–68.Google Scholar
Neumann, R. 1878. Catalog der podophthalmen Crustaceen des Heidelberger Museums, pp. 24–5. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Norman, A. M. 1891. Bathynectes Stimpson, a British genus of Crustacea Brachyura. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. Ser. VI, Vol. VII, pp. 272–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortmann, A. E. 1899. In:—Bronn, Das Thierreich, Bd. V, Abthlg. II. Crustacea, Zweite Hälfte: Malacostraca, pp. 1170–71.Google Scholar
Parisi, B. 1915. Il genere Portunus nel Mediterraneo. Monitore Zoologico Italiano. Anno. XXVI, No. 11.Google Scholar
Rathbun, M. J. 1897. A revision of the nomenclature of the Brachyura. Proc. Biol. Soc.., Washington, Vol. IX, pp. 153–67.Google Scholar
Rathbun, M. J. 1902. Japanese Stalk-eyed Crustaceans. Proc. U.S. Nat. Museum, Vol. XXVI, No. 1307, pp. 25–6.Google Scholar
Saussure, H. L. F. DE. 1858. L’histoire Naturelle de Mexique, des Antilles et des États-Unis. Tom. I, mem. 1, Crustacés, p. 17.Google Scholar
Scott, T. 1888. A revised list of the Crustacea of the Firth of Forth. 6th Ann. Rept. Fish. Bd. Scotland. Part III, p. 256.Google Scholar
Stimpson, W. 1858. Prodromus descripsionis animalium everte-bratorum … Pars. IV. Crustacea cancroidea et Corystoidea. Proc. Acad. Nat, Sci.., Philadelphia, 1858, p. 35.Google Scholar
Stimpson, W. 1869. Preliminary Report on the Crustacea dredged in the Gulf Stream in the Straits of Florida… Part I. Brachyura. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool.., Harvard. Vol. II, pp. 145–46.Google Scholar
Straelen, V. VAN. 1924. Portunus brouiveri, Portunien nouveau du tertiare de l’ile Célébes. Jaarb. Mijnw. Ned. Oost-Ind. ’s Gravenhage, LII, pp. 167–70, Fig.Google Scholar
Warren, E. 1896. Variation in Portunus depurator Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond.., Vol. LX, pp. 221–243.Google Scholar
Weber, F. 1795. Nomenclator Entomologicus secundum Entomologiam systematicam ill. Fabricii… Chilonii et Hamburgi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar