Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T09:35:24.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reproductive cycle and energetic cost of reproduction of the neogastropod Buccinum undatum in the Irish Sea

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

A. E. Kideys ,
R. D. M. Nash  and
R. G. Hartnoll
A. E. Kideys
Affiliation:
Port Erin Marine Laboratory, University of Liverpool, Isle of Man.
R. D. M. Nash
Affiliation:
Port Erin Marine Laboratory, University of Liverpool, Isle of Man.
R. G. Hartnoll
Affiliation:
Port Erin Marine Laboratory, University of Liverpool, Isle of Man.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The annual reproductive cycle and cost of reproduction of the common whelk, Buccinum undatum L. (Gastropoda: Prosobranchia) were studied off Douglas, south-east of the Isle of Man. Sexual maturity was reached at 60–70 mm shell length. Two years of laboratory observation and field data indicated an autumn to mid-winter breeding season. Egg-laying occurred in the laboratory mainly between December and January, and hatching of juveniles between April and early May, 3–5 months after spawning. The cycles of testis and ovary development were very similar, especially during the breeding period. The annual energy invested in reproduction was estimated to be at least 4.1 kj m-2. The investment by females (3.84 kj m-2 y-1) was much greater than by males (0.26 kj m-2 y-1).

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 73 , Issue 2 , May 1993 , pp. 391 - 403
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, B. A., Eversole, A. G. & Anderson, W. D., 1989. Variations in shell and radula morphologies of knobbed whelks. journal of Shellfish Research, 8, 213–218.Google Scholar
Aurivillius, C. W. S., 1898. Om Hafsevertebraternas Utvecklingstider och Periodiciteten i Larvformernas Uppträdande vid Sveriges Vestkust. Bihang Till K. Svenska Vetenskaps-Akademiens Handlingar, 24, Afd. 4(4), 1–91.Google Scholar
Bernard, F. R., 1968. Sexual dimorphism in Polinices lewisi (Naticidae). Nautilus, 82, 1–3.Google Scholar
Bruce, J. R., Colman, J. S. & Jones, N. S., 1963. Marine fauna of the Isle of Man, and its surrounding seas, 2nd ed. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar
Crisp, D. J., 1984. Energy flow measurements. In Methods for the study of marine benthos, 2nd ed. (ed. Holme, N. A. and Mclntyre, A. D.), pp. 284–372. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
Cunningham, J. T., 1899. Formation of egg-capsules in Gasteropoda. Nature, London, 59, 557.Google Scholar
Dakin, W. J., 1912. Buccinum (the whelk). Liverpool Marine Biology Committee, Memoirs, no. 20, 1–115.Google Scholar
D'asaro, C. N., 1970. Egg capsules of prosobranch mollusks from South Florida and the Bahamas and notes on spawning in the laboratory. Bulletin of Marine Science, 20, 414–440.Google Scholar
Davis, J. P. & Wilson, J. G., 1985. The energy budget and population structure of Nucula turgida in Dublin Bay. Journal of Animal Ecology, 54, 557–571.Google Scholar
Edwards, D. C., 1968. Reproduction in Olivella biplkata. Veliger, 10, 297–304.Google Scholar
Feare, C. J., 1969. The dynamics of a population of dog-whelks (Thais lapillus). PhD thesis, University of Liverpool.Google Scholar
Fretter, V., 1941. The genital ducts of some British stenoglossan prosobranchs. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 25, 173–211.Google Scholar
Fretter, V., 1953. The transference of sperm from male to female prosobranch, with reference, also, to the Pyramidellids. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of London, 164, 217–224.Google Scholar
Fretter, V. & Graham, A., 1962. British prosobranch molluscs: their functional anatomy and ecology. London: Ray Society.Google Scholar
Fretter, V. & Graham, A., 1984. The prosobranch molluscs of Britain and Denmark. Part 8. Neogastropoda. Journal of Molluscan Studies, supplement 15, 435–556.Google Scholar
Fujinaga, K., 1985. The reproductive ecology of the neptune whelk (Neptunea arthritica Bernardi) population, with special reference to the reproductive cycles, depositions of egg masses and hatching of juveniles. Bulletin of the Faculty of Fisheries, Hokkaido University, 36, 87–98.Google Scholar
Hallers-Tjabbes, C. C. Ten, 1979. Sexual dimorphism in Buccinum undatum L. Malacologia, 18, 13–17.Google Scholar
Hancock, D. A., 1960. The ecology of the molluscan enemies of the edible mollusc. Proceedings of the Malacological Society of London, 34, 123–143.Google Scholar
Hancock, D. A., 1967. Whelks. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Laboratory Leaflet, no. 15, 1–14.Google Scholar
Havinga, B., 1922. Mariene mollusken. inFlora en fauna der Zuiderzee (ed. Redeke, H. C.), pp. 373–390. den Helder: C. de Boer Jr.Google Scholar
Horn, P. L., 1986. Energetics of Chiton pelliserpentis (Quoy & Gaimard, 1835) (Mollusca: Polyplacophora) and the importance of mucus in its energy budget. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 101, 119–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, R. N., 1971. Ecological energetics oiNerita (Archaegastropoda, Neritacea) populations on Barbados, West Indies. Marine Biology, 11, 12–22.Google Scholar
Ito, H., 1978. Observations on the spawning of sea snails, two species of the genus Buccinum, B. kinukatsugi and B. miyauchii. Bulletin of the Hokkaido Regional Fisheries Research Laboratory, 43, 69–77.Google Scholar
Johansson, J., 1957. Notes on the littorinacean and stenoglossan genital organs, and a comparison with the Rissoacea. Zoologiska Bidrag Från Uppsala, 32, 81–91.Google Scholar
Kideys, A. E., 1991. The ecology of the common whelk, Buccinum undatum L. off Douglas, Isle of Man, with particular reference to its ecological energetics. PhD thesis, University of Liverpool.Google Scholar
Kitching, J. A., Muntz, L. & Ebling, F. J., 1966. The ecology of Lough Ine. XV. The ecological significance of shell and body forms in Nucella. Journal of Animal Ecology, 35, 113–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kristensen, E., 1959. The coastal waters of the Netherlands as an environment of molluscan life. Basteria, 23, supplement, 18–46.Google Scholar
Kusnetsov, V. V., 1963. Seasonal and temperature conditions for the breeding of marine invertebrates. In Data for a comprehensive study of the White Sea, vol. 2 (ed. Palenichko, Z. G.), pp. 32–52. Moscow: Akademii Nauk SSSR. [In Russian.]Google Scholar
Lebour, M. V., 1937. The eggs and larvae of the British prosobranchs with special reference to those living in the plankton. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 22, 105–166.Google Scholar
Magalhaes, H., 1948. An ecological study of snails of the genus Busy con at Beaufort, North Carolina. Ecological Monographs, 18, 377–409.Google Scholar
Martel, A., Larrivée, D. H. & Himmelman, J. H., 1986a. Behaviour and timing of copulation and egg-laying in the neogastropod Buccinum undatum L. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 96, 27–42.Google Scholar
Martel, A., Larrivée, D. H., Klein, K. R. & Himmelman, J. H., 1986b. Reproductive cycle and seasonal feeding activity of the neogastropod Buccinum undatum. Marine Biology, 92, 211–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, H. B., 1937. Marine fauna of the Isle of Man. Proceedings and Transactions of the Liverpool Biological Society, 50, 1–293.Google Scholar
Paine, R. T., 1971. Energy flow in a natural population of the herbivorous gastropod Tegula funebralis. Limnology and Oceanography, 16, 86–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearce, J. B. & Thorson, G., 1967. The feeding and reproductive biology of the red whelk, Neptunea antiqua (L.) (Gastropoda, Prosobranchia). Ophelia, 4, 277–314.Google Scholar
Phillipson, J., 1964. A miniature bomb calorimeter for small biological samples. Oikos, 15, 130–139.Google Scholar
Sykes, E. R., 1905. The marine fauna of the west coast of Ireland. Part II. The molluscs and brachiopods of Ballynakill and Bofin Harbours, Co. Galway, and of the deep water off the west and south-west coasts of Ireland. Annual Report, Fisheries, Ireland, 1902–03, Appendix III, 53–92.Google Scholar
Takahashi, N., Takano, K. & Murai, S., 1972. Histological studies on the reproductive cycle of male neptune whelk, Neptunea arthritica. Bulletin of the Faculty of Fisheries, Hokkaido University, 23, 65–72.Google Scholar
Thorson, G., 1946. Reproduction and larval development of Danish marine bottom invertebrates, with special reference to the planktonic larvae in the Sound (Øresund). Meddelelser fra Kommissionen for Danmarks Fiskeri-og Havundersegelser. Serie: Plankton, 4, 1–523.Google Scholar
Webber, H. H., 1977. Gastropoda: Prosobranchia. In Reproduction of marine invertebrates, vol. IV. Molluscs: gastropods and cephalopods (ed. Giese, A. C. and Pearse, J. S.), pp. 1–97. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
West, D. L., 1978a. Reproductive biology of Colus stimpsoni (Prosobranchia: Buccinidae). I. Male genital system. Veliger, 20, 266–273.Google Scholar
West, D. L., 1978b. Reproductive biology of Colus stimpsoni (Prosobranchia: Buccinidae). II. Spermiogenesis. Veliger, 21, 1–9.Google Scholar
West, D. L., 1979. Reproductive biology of Colus stimpsoni - III (Prosobranchia: Buccinidae). Female genital system. Veliger, 21, 432–438.Google Scholar