Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T09:23:41.438Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reproductive characteristics of the sand sole Pegusa lascaris (Soleidae), from the eastern-central Atlantic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 May 2008

José G. Pajuelo  and
José M. Lorenzo
José G. Pajuelo*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biología, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Campus Universitario de Tafira, 35017 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
José M. Lorenzo
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biología, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Campus Universitario de Tafira, 35017 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: José G. Pajuelo Departamento de BiologíaUniversidad de Las Palmas de Gran CanariaCampus Universitario de Tafira 35017 Las Palmas de Gran CanariaSpain email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The reproductive biology of 1318 sand sole, Pegusa lascaris, was investigated. This species is a gonochoristic species with no evidence of sexual dimorphism. The overall sex-ratio was 1 male to 0.92 females. Females predominate in the larger size intervals, with a significant difference in mean standard length and range between sexes. Size at first maturity for males and females is attained at 17.2 and 17.7 cm standard length, respectively. Vitellogenesis does not begin synchronously for all females, as a consequence the spawning season appears to be continuous. In each female spawning takes place in two batches which are spawned mainly in spring and autumn, indicating that fish are serial synchronous spawners.

Keywords

sexualityreproductionPegusa lascarisCanary Islands
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 88 , Issue 3 , May 2008 , pp. 629 - 635
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abookire, A.A. (2006) Reproductive biology, spawning season, and growth of female rex sole (Glyptocephalus zachirus) in the Gulf of Alaska. Fishery Bulletin 104, 350–359.Google Scholar
Afonso-Dias, I., Reis, C. and Andrade, J.P. (2005) Reproductive aspects of Microchirus azevia (Risso, 1810) (Pisces: Soleidae) from the south coast of Portugal. Scientia Marina 69, 275–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, R.O. and Gutreuter, S.J. (1983) Length, weight, and associated structural indices. In L.A., Nielsen and D.L., Johnson (eds) Fisheries techniques. Bethesda: American Fisheries Society, pp. 283–300.Google Scholar
Andrade, J.P. (1998) Age and growth of the bastard sole, Microchirus azevia (Capello, 1868) (Pisces, Soleidae) from the south coast of Portugal. Fisheries Research 34, 205–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deniel, C. (1990) Comparative study of growth of flatfishes on the west coast of Brittany. Journal of Fish Biology 37, 149–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deniel, C., Le Blanc, C. and Rodriguez, A. (1989) Comparative study of sexual cycles, oogenesis and spawning of two Soleidae, Solea lascaris (Risso, 1810) and Solea impar (Bennet, 1831), on the western coast of Brittany. Journal of Fish Biology 35, 49–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desoutter, M. (1994) Révision des genres Microchirus, Dicoglosa et Vanstraelenia (Pleuronectiformes, Soleidae). Cybium 18, 215–336.Google Scholar
Dinis, M.T. (1986) Quatre soleidae de l'estuaire du Tage. Reproduction et croissance. Essai d'elevage de Solea senegalensis Kaup. PhD thesis, Université de Brest, Brest, France.Google Scholar
Draper, N.R. and Smith, R. (2000) Applied regression analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Grimes, C.B. (1987) Reproductive biology of the Lutjanidae: A review. In J.J., Plovina and Ralston, S. (eds) Tropical snappers and groupers: biology and fisheries management. London: Westview Press, pp. 239–294.Google Scholar
Muus, B.J. and Nielsen, J.G. (1999) Sea fish. Scandinavian fishing year book. Denmark: Hedehusene.Google Scholar
Nikolskii, G.V. (1963) The ecology of the fishes. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Quéro, J.-C., Desoutter, M. and Lagardère, F. (1986) Soleidae. In P.J.P., Whitehead et al. (eds) Fishes of the north-eastern Atlantic and Mediterranean. Paris: UNESCO, pp. 1308–1324.Google Scholar
Ramos, J. (1983) Contribution to the study of oogenesis in the sole Solea solea (Linnaeus, 1758) (Pisces, Soleidae). Investigación Pesquera 47, 241–252.Google Scholar
Ramsay, K. and Witthames, P. (1996) Using oocyte size to assess seasonal ovarian development in Solea solea (L). Journal of Sea Research 36, 275–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rijnsdorp, A.D., Van Beek, F.A., Flatman, S., Millner, R.M., Riley, D., Giret, M. and De Clerck, R. (1992) Recruitment of sole stocks, Solea solea (L.), in the northeast Atlantic. Netherland Journal of Sea Research 29, 173–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodriguez, A. (1996) Diet of two Soleidae, Solea lascaris and Solea impar, on the western coast of Brittany. Cybium 20, 261–277.Google Scholar
Saila, S.B., Recksiek, C.W. and Prager, M.H. (1988) Basic fishery science programs. A compendium of microcomputer programs and manual of operation. Developments in Aquaculture and Fisheries Science 18, 1–230.Google Scholar
Sokal, R.R. and Rohlf, F.J. (1995) Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research. New York: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Stark, J.W. (2004) A comparison of the maturation and growth of female flathead sole in the central Gulf of Alaska and the south-eastern Bering Sea. Journal of Fish Biology 64, 876–889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stark, J.W. and Somerton, D.A. (2002) Maturation, spawning and growth of rock soles off Kodiak Island in the Gulf of Alaska. Journal of Fish Biology 61, 417–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thangaraja, M. and Ramamoorthi, K. (1982) Laboratory rearing of eggs and larvae of the flatfish Solea ovata Rich. Indian Journal of Marine Science 11, 273–275.Google Scholar
Tomasini, J.A., Collart, D. and Quignard, J.P. (1996) Female reproductive biology of the sand smelt in brackish lagoons of southern France. Journal of Fish Biology 49, 594–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, G. (1990) Methods of assessing ovarian development in fishes: a review. Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 41, 199–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witthames, P.R. and Walker, M.G. (1995) Determinacy of fecundity and oocyte atresia in sole (Solea solea) (Pisces) from the Channel, the North Sea and the Irish Sea. Aquatic Living Resources 8, 91–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaki, M.I. (1989) Gametogenesis and the sexual cycles of the sole, Solea solea, in Lake Karun (Egypt). Journal of Ichthyology 29, 49–55.Google Scholar