Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:27:56.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The relationship between environmental variation and species abundance in shrimp community (Crustacea: Decapoda: Penaeoidea) in south-eastern Brazil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2008

Antonio L. Castilho ,
Marcio R. Pie ,
Adilson Fransozo ,
Allysson P. Pinheiro  and
Rogério C. Costa
Antonio L. Castilho*
Affiliation:
NEBECC (Group of Studies on Crustacean Biology, Ecology and Culture), Departamento de Zoologia, Universidade Estadual Paulista, 18618-000, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil
Marcio R. Pie
Affiliation:
Grupo Integrado de Aqüicultura e Estudos Ambientais, Universidade Federal do Paraná, 81531-990, Curitiba, PR, Brazil
Adilson Fransozo
Affiliation:
NEBECC (Group of Studies on Crustacean Biology, Ecology and Culture), Departamento de Zoologia, Universidade Estadual Paulista, 18618-000, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil
Allysson P. Pinheiro
Affiliation:
NEBECC (Group of Studies on Crustacean Biology, Ecology and Culture), Departamento de Zoologia, Universidade Estadual Paulista, 18618-000, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil
Rogério C. Costa
Affiliation:
NEBECC (Group of Studies on Crustacean Biology, Ecology and Culture), Departamento de Zoologia, Universidade Estadual Paulista, 18618-000, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil Departado de Ciências Biológicas, Faculdade de ciẽncias, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Bauru, SP, Brazil
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: Antonio L. Castilho NEBECC (Group of Studies on Crustacean Biology, Ecology and Culture) Departamento de ZoologiaUniversidade Estadual Paulista18618-000, Botucatu São PauloBrazil email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The impact of shrimp fisheries in tropical regions has become comparable to the world's most intensively exploited temperate shelf ecosystems. The increase in the fishing fleet in south-eastern Brazil and the decrease in landings of profitable shrimp species have contributed to the incorporation of additional species into those fisheries. The goal of the present study is to investigate the influence of environmental factors on the abundance patterns of shrimp communities on the south-eastern coast of Brazil, over a period of two years. Monthly collections were conducted in the Ubatuba and Caraguatatuba regions using a commercial shrimp fishing boat equipped with ‘double-rig’ nets. Each region was divided into 7 sampling stations up to 35 m deep. The relationship between the environmental factors and the abundance patterns in the shrimp communities was assessed using a canonical correlation analysis (CCorrA). The first set of variables used during the CCorrA included environmental characteristics and the second set of variables the abundance of the studied species. A total of 374,915 individuals were collected during the present study. Xiphopenaeus kroyeri showed the highest abundance (273,127), followed by Artemesia longinaris (73,422), and Pleoticus muelleri (15,262). In the first root, depth and temperature showed the highest factor loadings (0.9 and −0.7) and canonical weights (0.6 and −0.4). These environmental factors were strongly associated with the abundance of X. kroyeri (factor loading =−0.9 and canonical weight =−0.9). The second root demonstrated a positive relationship between abundance of P. muelleri and depth, and an inverse association with bottom temperature. The abundance patterns of X. kroyeri and P. muelleri were strongly affected by the water mass South Atlantic Central Water (cold waters =15°C), which can lead to a temperature decrease in deeper areas (>15 m). Thus, the opposite abundance trend for depth of these species might reflect bathymetric variation in temperature, a clear example of distinct behavioural differences of species of different origins, either tropical (X. kroyeri) or subantarctic (P. muelleri). The low overall association between environmental parameters and shrimp abundance patterns indicates that each studied species might have responded idiosyncratically to environmental variation, such that a general community-level response was not apparent. However, other confounding factors such as intraspecific migration patterns might have also played a role in generating the observed patterns.

Keywords

ShrimpcommunityvariationBrazil
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 88 , Issue 1 , February 2008 , pp. 119 - 123
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bertness, M.D. (1999) The ecology of Atlantic shorelines, 1st edn. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
Boschi, E.E. (1969) Estudio biológico pesquero del camarón Artemesia longinaris Bate de Mar del Plata. Boletín del Instituto de Biología Marina 18, 1–47.Google Scholar
Boschi, E.E. (1989) Biologia pesquera del lagostino del patagonico de Argentina (Pleoticus muelleri). Contribuciones del Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo Pesquero 646, 5–71.Google Scholar
Boschi, E.E. (2000) Species of decapod crustaceans and their distribution in the marine zoogeographic provinces. Revista de Investigación y Desarrollo Pesquero 13, 7–136.Google Scholar
Castilho, A.L., Costa, R.C., Fransozo, A. and Boschi, E.E. (2007a) Reproductive pattern of the South American endemic shrimp Artemesia longinaris (Decapoda, Penaeidae), off the coast of São Paulo state, Brazil. Revista de Biología Tropical. in press.Google Scholar
Castilho, A.L., Gavio, M.A., Costa, R.C., Boschi, E.E., Bauer, R.T. and Fransozo, A. (2007b) Latitudinal variation in population structure and reproduction pattern of the endemic South American shrimp Artemesia longinaris (Decapoda: Penaeoidea). Journal of Crustacean Biology 27. in press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castro, R.H., Costa, R.C., Fransozo, A. and Mantelatto, F.L.M. (2005) Population structure of seabob shrimp Xiphopenaeus kroyeri (Heller, 1862) (Crustacea: Penaeoidea) in the littoral of São Paulo, Brazil. Scientia Marina 69, 105–112.Google Scholar
Castro-Filho, B.M., Miranda, L.B. and Myao, S.Y. (1987) Condições hidrográficas na plataforma continental ao largo de Ubatuba: variações sazonais e em média escala. Boletim do Instituto Oceanográfico 35, 135–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chagas-Soares, F., Pereira, O.M. and Santos, E.P. (1995) Contribuição ao ciclo biológico de Penaeus schmitti Burkenroad, 1936, Penaeus brasiliensis Latreille, 1817 e Penaeus paulensis Pérez-Farfante, 1967, na região Lagunar-Estuarina de Cananéia, São Paulo, Brasil. Boletim do Instituto de Pesca 22, 49–59.Google Scholar
Costa, R.C. (2002) Biologia e Distribuição Ecológica das Espécies de Camarões Dendrobranchiata (Crustacea: Decapoda) na Região de Ubatuba (SP). PhD thesis, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Botucatu, Brazil.Google Scholar
Costa, R.C. and Fransozo, A. (2004) Abundance and ecologic distribution of the shrimp Rimapenaeus constrictus (Crustacea: Penaeidae) in the northern coast of São Paulo State, Brazil. Journal of Natural History 38, 901–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa, R.C., Fransozo, A., Castilho, A.L. and Freire, F.A.M. (2005) Annual, seasonal and spatial variation of abundance of the shrimp Artemesia longinaris (Decapoda: Penaeoidea) in a south-eastern region of Brazil. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 85, 107–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa, R.C., Fransozo, A., Freire, F.A.M. and Castilho, A.L. (2007) Abundance and ecological distribution of the ‘sete-barbas’ shrimp Xipohpenaeus kroyeri (Heller, 1862) (Decapoda: Penaeoidea) in three bays of the Ubatuba region, South-eastern Brazil. Gulf and Caribbean Research 19, 33–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa, R.C., Fransozo, A. and Pinheiro, A.P. (2004) Ecological distribution of the shrimp Pleoticus muelleri (Bate, 1888) (Decapoda: Penaeoidea) in southeastern Brazil. Hydrobiologia 529, 195–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuesta, J.A., González-Ortegón, E., Rodríguez, A., Baldó, F. Vilas, C. and Drake, P. (2006) The decapod crustacean community of the Guadalquivir estuary (SW Spain): seasonal and inter-year changes in community structure. Hydrobiologia 557, 85–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dall, W., Hill, B.J., Rothlisberg, P.C. and Staples, D.J. (1990) The biology of the Penaeidae. In Blaxter, J.H.S and Southward, A.J. (eds) Advances in marine biology. San Diego: Academic Press, pp. 1–489.Google Scholar
D'Incao, F., Valentini, H. and Rodrigues, L.F. (2002) Avaliação da pesca de camarões nas regiões Sudeste e Sul do Brasil. Atlântica 24, 103–116.Google Scholar
Fransozo, A., Costa, R.C., Castilho, A.L. and Mantelatto, F.L.M. (2004) Ecological distribution of the shrimp ‘barba-ruça’ Artemesia longinaris (Decapoda: Penaeidae) in Fortaleza Bay, Ubatuba, Brazil. Revista de Investigación y Desarrollo Pesquero 16, 45–53.Google Scholar
Fransozo, A., Costa, R.C., Mantelatto, F.L.M., Pinheiro, M.A.A. and Santos, S. (2002) Composition and abundance shrimp species (Penaeidea and Caridea) in Fortaleza bay, Ubatuba, São Paulo, Brasil. In Briones, E.E. and Alvarez, F. (eds) Modern approaches to the study of Crustacea. México: Kluwer Academic Press, pp. 117–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcia, S. and Le Reste, L. (1981) Life cycles, dynamics, exploitation, and management of coastal penaeid shrimp stocks. FAO Fisheries Technical Papers 203, 1–215.Google Scholar
Gavio, M.A. and Boschi, E.E. (2004) Biology of the shrimp Artemesia longinaris Bate, 1888 (Crustacea: Decapoda: Penaeidae) from Mar del Plata coast, Argentina. Nauplius 12, 83–94.Google Scholar
Gunter, G., Christmas, J.Y. and Killebrew, R. (1964) Some relations of salinity to population distributions of motile estuarine organisms, with special reference to penaeid shrimp. Ecology 45, 181–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harley, C.D.G., Hughes, A.R., Hultgren, K.M., Miner, B.G., Sorte, C.J.B., Thornber, C.S., Rodriguez, L.F., Tomanek, L. and Williams, S.L. (2006) The impacts of climate change in coastal marine systems. Ecology Letters 9, 228–241.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lenihan, H.S. and Micheli, F. (2001) Soft-sediment communities. In Bertness, M.D. et al. (eds) Marine community ecology. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates, pp. 253–287.Google Scholar
Nakagaki, J.M., Negreiros-Fransozo, M.L. and Fransozo, A. (1995) Composição e abundância de camarões marinhos (Crustacea; Decapoda: Penaeidae) na Enseada de Ubatuba, Ubatuba, Brasil. Arquivos de Biologia e Tecnologia 38, 583–591.Google Scholar
Pauly, D. and Christensen, V. (1995) Primary production required to sustain global fisheries. Nature 374, 255–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauly, D., Christensen, V., Guénette, S., Pitcher, T.J., Sumaila, U.R., Walters, C.J., Watson, R. and Zeller, D. (2002) Towards sustainability in world fisheries. Nature 418, 689–695.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tucker, M. (1988) Techniques in sedimentology. Boston, US and Oxford, UK: Blackwell Scientific Publications, pp. 1–394.Google Scholar