Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T02:20:44.920Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Patterns of sandy-beach macrofauna production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2013

Marcelo Petracco ,
Ricardo Silva Cardoso  and
Alexander Turra
Marcelo Petracco*
Affiliation:
Departamento Oceanografia Biológica, Instituto Oceanográfico, Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Praça do Oceanográfico, 191, Cidade Universitária, São Paulo, SP, Brazil, CEP 05508-120
Ricardo Silva Cardoso
Affiliation:
Departamento Ecologia e Recursos Marinhos, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UNIRIO), Avenida Pasteur, 458, Urca, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil. CEP 22290-240
Alexander Turra
Affiliation:
Departamento Oceanografia Biológica, Instituto Oceanográfico, Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Praça do Oceanográfico, 191, Cidade Universitária, São Paulo, SP, Brazil, CEP 05508-120
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: M. Petracco, Departamento Oceanografia Biológica, Instituto Oceanográfico, Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Praça do Oceanográfico, 191, Cidade Universitária, São Paulo, SP, CEP 05508-120, Brazil email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Using data available from the literature, patterns of biomass, production and productivity of sandy-beach macrofauna populations were examined, considering environmental (temperature, exposure, grain size and beach slope) and biological variables (life span and mean body mass) and feeding and taxonomic groups. A total of 102 estimates of both production and biomass and 105 estimates of P/B ratios were collected from 52 studies carried out between 42°46′S and 54°05′N, for 83 sandy-beach macrofauna populations. The negative relationship between P/B ratio and beach slope for the supralittoral amphipods agrees with the Habitat Safety Hypothesis, according to which these forms would show higher mortality in dissipative than in reflective beaches. The observed higher production of filter-feeders in exposed than in sheltered beaches suggests that more food is available for filter-feeders in exposed beaches. The higher production of filter-feeders (represented by bivalves and decapods), than of scavengers/predators (peracarids and gastropods) showed the importance of filter-feeders in the food web of sandy beaches. The P/B ratios were strongly related to life span, but weakly or not related to the mean body mass. The high amphipod P/B ratio was attributed to the short life span of these crustaceans; conversely, gastropods showed the lowest P/B ratio, in accordance with their longer life span. The observed differences in biomass, production and P/B ratios within crustaceans and molluscs were attributed to differences in life-history traits and feeding mode.

Keywords

sandy beachesmacrofaunasecondary productionP/B ratiolife span
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 93 , Issue 7 , November 2013 , pp. 1717 - 1725
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allen, K.R. (1971) Relation between production and biomass. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 28, 1573–1581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benke, A.C. (1993) Concepts and patterns of invertebrate production in running waters. Verhandlungen des Internationalen Verein Limnologie 25, 15–28.Google Scholar
Benke, A.C. (2010) Secondary production as part of bioenergetic theory-contributions from freshwater benthic science. River Research and Applications 26, 36–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benke, A.C. and Huryn, A.D. (2006) Secondary production of macroinvertebrates. In Hauer, F.T. and Lamberti, G.A. (eds) Methods in stream ecology. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press, pp. 691–710.Google Scholar
Benke, A.C. and Huryn, A.D. (2010) Benthic invertebrate production—facilitating answers to ecological riddles in freshwater ecosystems. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 29, 264–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brey, T. (2001) Population dynamics in benthic invertebrates. A virtual handbook. Version 1.2. Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, Germany. Available at: http://www.thomas-brey.de/science/virtualhandbook (accessed 22 February 2013).Google Scholar
Brey, T. and Clarke, A. (1993) Populations dynamics of marine benthic invertebrates in Antarctic and subantarctic environments: are there unique adaptations? Antarctic Science 5, 253–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brey, T., Rumohr, H. and Ankar, S. (1988) Energy content of macrobenthic invertebrates: general conversion factors from weight to energy. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 117, 271–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardoso, R.S. and Defeo, O. (2003) Geographical patterns in reproductive biology of the Pan-American sandy beach isopod Excirolana braziliensis. Marine Biology 143, 573–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardoso, R.S. and Defeo, O. (2004) Biogeographical patterns in life history traits of the Pan-American sandy beach isopod Excirolana braziliensis. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 61, 559–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardoso, R.S. and Veloso, V.G. (1996) Population biology and secondary production of the sandhopper Pseudorchestoidea brasiliensis (Amphipoda: Talitridae) at Prainha Beach, Brazil. Marine Ecology Progress Series 142, 111–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardoso, R.S. and Veloso, V.G. (2003) Population dynamics and secondary production of the wedge clam Donax hanleyanus on a high energy, subtropical beach of Brazil. Marine Biology 142, 153–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartes, J.E., Brey, T., Sorbe, J.C. and Maynou, F. (2002) Comparing production–biomass ratios of benthos and suprabenthos in macrofaunal marine crustaceans. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 59, 1616–1625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartes, J.E. and Sorbe, J.C. (1999) Estimating secondary production in bathyal suprabenthic peracarid crustaceans form the Catalan Sea slope (western Mediterranean; 391–1255 m). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 239, 195–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Celentano, E., Gutiérrez, N. and Defeo, O. (2010) Effects of morphodynamic and estuarine gradients on a sandy beach mole crab demography and distribution: implications for source–sink habitat dynamics. Marine Ecology Progress Series 398, 193–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cusson, M. and Bourget, E. (2005) Global patterns of macroinvertebrate production in marine benthic habitats. Marine Ecology Progress Series 297, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Defeo, O. and Cardoso, R.S. (2002) Macroecology of population dynamics and life history traits of the mole crab Emerita brasiliensis in Atlantic sandy beaches of South America. Marine Ecology Progress Series 239, 169–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Defeo, O. and Cardoso, R.S. (2004) Latitudinal patterns in abundance and life-history traits of the mole crab Emerita brasiliensis on South American sandy beaches. Diversity and Distributions 10, 89–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Defeo, O. and McLachlan, A. (2005) Patterns, processes and regulatory mechanisms in sandy beach macrofauna: a multi-scale analysis. Marine Ecology Progress Series 295, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Defeo, O. and McLachlan, A. (2011) Coupling between macrofauna community structure and beach type: a deconstructive meta-analysis. Marine Ecology Progress Series 433, 29–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Defeo, O., McLachlan, A., Schoeman, D.S., Schlacher, T.A., Dugan, J., Jones, A., Lastra, M. and Scapini, F. (2009) Threats to sandy beaches ecosystems: a review. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 81, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Defeo, O. and Gómez, J. (2005) Morphodynamics and habitat safety in sandy beaches: life-history adaptations in a supralittoral amphipod. Marine Ecology Progress Series 293, 143–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dexter, D.M. (1992) Sandy beach community structure: the role of exposure and latitude. Journal of Biogeography 19, 59–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dugan, J.E., Hubbard, D.M., Rodil, I.F., Revell, D.L. and Schroeter, S. (2008) Ecological effects of coastal armoring on sandy beaches. Marine Ecology 29 (Supplement 1), 160–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrmann, M., Carstensen, D., Fisher, S., Laudien, J., Penchaszadeh, P.E. and Arntz, W.E. (2009) Population structure, growth, and production of the wedge clam Donax hanleyanus (Bivalvia: Donacidae) from Northern Argentinean beaches. Journal of Shellfish Research 28, 511–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huryn, A.D. and Benke, A.C. (2007) Relationship between biomass turnover and body size for stream communities. In Hildrew, A., Raffaelli, D. and Edmonds-Brown, R. (eds) Body size: the structure and function on aquatic ecosystems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 55–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lercari, D., Bergamino, L. and Defeo, O. (2010) Trophic models in sandy beaches with contrasting morphodynamics: comparing ecosystem structure and biomass flow. Ecological Modelling 221, 2751–2759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLachlan, A. (1980) The definition of sandy beaches in relation to exposure: a simple rating system. South African Journal of Science 76, 137–138.Google Scholar
McLachlan, A. (1983) Sandy beach ecology—a review. In McLachlan, A. and Erasmus, T. (eds) Sandy beaches as ecosystems. The Hague: W. Junk, pp. 321–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLachlan, A. and Brown, A. (2006) Sandy beaches as ecosystems. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
McLachlan, A. and Dorvlo, A. (2005) Global patterns in sandy beach macrobenthic communities. Journal of Coastal Research, 21, 674–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLachlan, A., Dugan, J.E., Defeo, O., Ansell, A.D., Hubbard, D.M., Jaramillo, E. and Penchaszadeh, P. (1996) Beach clam fisheries. Oceanography and Marine Biology: an Annual Review 34, 163–232.Google Scholar
Peterson, C.H., Summerson, H.C., Thomson, E., Lenihan, H.S., Grabowski, J., Manning, L., Micheli, F. and Johnson, G. (2000) Synthesis of linkages between benthic and fish communities as a key to protecting essential fish habitat. Bulletin of Marine Science 66, 759–774.Google Scholar
Petracco, M., Cardoso, R.S. and Corbisier, T.N. (2010) Population biology of Excirolana armata (Dana, 1853) (Isopoda, Cirolanidae) on an exposed sandy beach in Southeastern Brazil. Marine Ecology 31, 330–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petracco, M., Cardoso, R.S., Turra, A. and Corbisier, T.N. (2012) Production of Excirolana armata (Dana, 1853) (Isopoda, Cirolanidae) on an exposed sandy beach in Southeastern Brazil. Helgoland Marine Research, 66, 265–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petracco, M., Veloso, V.G. and Cardoso, R.S. (2003) Population dynamics and secondary production of Emerita brasiliensis (Crustacea: Hippidae) at Prainha Beach, Brazil. Marine Ecology 24, 385–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricciardi, A. and Bourget, E. (1998) Weight-to-weight conversion factors for marine benthic macroinvertebrates. Marine Ecology Progress Series 163, 245–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, A.I. (1979) The relationship between annual production: biomass ratio and lifespans for marine macrobenthos. Berlin: Springer.Google ScholarPubMed
Schlacher, T.A., Dugan, J., Schoeman, D.S., Lastra, M., Jones, A., Scapini, F., McLachlan, A. and Defeo, O. (2007) Sandy beaches at the brink. Diversity and Distributions 13, 556–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Short, A.D. (1996) The role of wave weight, period, slope, tide range and embaymentisation in beach classifications: a review. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 69, 589–604.Google Scholar
Veloso, V.G. and Cardoso, R.S. (1999) Population biology of the mole crab Emerita brasiliensis (Decapoda: Hippidae) at Urca beach, Brazil. Journal of Crustacean Biology 19, 147–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waters, T.F. (1977) Secondary production in inland waters. Advances in Ecological Research 10, 91–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zar, J.H. (1999) Biostatistical analysis. 4th edition, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Petracco et al. supplementary material

Supplementary table

Download Petracco et al. supplementary material(File)
File 334.3 KB