Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T22:10:03.089Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Ovary as an Indicator of the Spawning Period in Fishes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

C. F. Hickling
Affiliation:
Fisheries Laboratory, Lowestoft.
E. Rutenberg
Affiliation:
Fisheries Institute, Moscow.

Extract

Accounts of the ovarian development of the eggs of fishes have been given by Kisselevitch (1923). Mayenne (1927), and recently by Hickling (1930) and Raitt (1933). They have concluded that in the ovary of the adult fish there is a general egg-stock of small eggs, yolkless and transparent in fresh material, and with deeply staining cytoplasm in fixed and stained material. From this egg-stock a quota is withdrawn each year to be matured and finally spawned, and to this egg-stock a fresh batch is added each year by the development of oocytes present beneath the surface of the ovigerous lamellæ, the minimum period of development being two seasons.

It has occurred to us that measurements of the diameters of eggs, in ovaries well advanced towards spawning, may give evidence of the duration of spawning in a fish of which the spawning habits are unknown. For where the spawning period is short and definite, the batch of transparent yolkless small eggs, destined to mature and be spawned, will be withdrawn from the general egg-stock in a single group, sharply distinguishable, at least in the later stages of maturation, from the stock of small eggs from which it was derived. But when the spawning period is long and indefinite, the withdrawal of eggs from the egg-stock, to undergo maturation, will be a continuous process, and there will be no sharp separation between the general egg-stock and the maturing eggs. These will pass continuously one into the other. We have tested this hypothesis with four species of fish of known spawning habits.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1936

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ambroz, A. J. 1931. The Herring (Clupea harengus pallasi C. & V.) of Peter the Great Bay. A biological sketch. Bull. of the Pacific Sc. Fish. Inst., Vol. 6, Vladivostock.Google Scholar
Clark, F. N. 1925. The Life History of Leuristhes tenuis. State of California Fish and Game Commission, Fish Bulletin No. 10.Google Scholar
Clark, R. S. 1920. The Pelagic Young and Early Bottom Stages of Teleosteans. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., N.S., Vol. XII, No. 2, p. 159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damas, D. 1910. Contribution à la Biologie des Gadides. Rapp. et Procès-Verbaux, Vol. X, No. 3.Google Scholar
Filatow, D. P. 1925. Zur Biologie und Morphologie der Fische des Aral. Revue Zool. Russe, Tome V, No. 1 and 2.Google Scholar
Heidrigh, H. 1925. Über die Fortpflanzung von Clupea sprattus in der Kieler Bucht. Wiss. Komm. Unters. d. deut. Meere in Kiel (Abt. Kiel) N.F. Bd. 20, Heft 1.Google Scholar
Hickling, C. F. 1930. The Natural History of the Hake. Part III. Fisheries Investigations, Min. of Agric. and Fish., Series II, Vol. XII, No. 1, London.Google Scholar
Hodgson, W. C. 1929. Investigations into the Age, Length, and Maturity of the Herring of the North Sea. Part III. Fisheries Investigations, Min. of Agric. and Fish., Series II, Vol. XI, No. 7, London.Google Scholar
Kisselevitch, K. A. 1923. Materials on the Biology of the Caspian Herrings. 1. The fertility of the Volga-Caspian herrings. Reports of the Ichthyolog. Lab. in Astrachan. Vol.V, No. 1.Google Scholar
Mayenne, V. A. 1927. Beobachtungen über die Veränderungen des Eierstockes des Barsches (Perca fluviatilis L.). Revue Zool. Russe, T. VII, 1. 4.Google Scholar
Raitt, D. S. 1933. The Fecundity of the Haddock. Fisheries, Scotland, Sci. Invest. 1932, No. 1.Google Scholar
Russell., F. S. 1930. The Seasonal Abundance and Distribution of the Pelagic Young of Teleostean Fishes. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., N.S., Vol. XVI, No. 3, p. 707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sirovatskaya, N. 1928. Materials on the fertility of fishes of river Dniepr. Rep. Kherson Ichthyol. Station for 1928.Google Scholar
Thompson, W. F. 1915. The Life History of the Halibut. Rep. Commissioner of Fisheries, British Columbia. Victoria, B.C., p. 85.Google Scholar
Vukotich, N. 1915. On the determination of fertility of herrings of genus Caspialosa. Materials for study of Russian Fisheries, Vol. IV, No. 6.Google Scholar