Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-44mx8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-14T16:10:24.348Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the occurrence of detached spherical colonies of the hydroids Sarsia tubulosa and Tubularia larynx in morecambe Bay

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

J. Clare ,
D. Jones  and
A. J. O'Sullivan
J. Clare
Affiliation:
Lancaster and Morecambe College of Further Education, Torrisholme Rd., Lancaster
D. Jones
Affiliation:
30 Rylestone Drive, Morecambe
A. J. O'Sullivan
Affiliation:
Lancashire and Western Sea Fisheries Joint Committee, 16 Waltons Parade, Preston
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

While it is known that the hydroid Clytiajohnstoni (Alder) may get broken off and drift in the plankton (Russell, personal communication), rounding off into pelagic colonies, there is, however, no record of the hydroids Sarsia tubulosa (M. Sars) and Tubularia larynx (Ellis and Solander) living under similar conditions.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 51 , Issue 2 , May 1971 , pp. 495 - 503
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Agassiz, L., 1862. Contributions to the Natural History of the United States of America, Vol. 4. Boston.Google Scholar
Alder, J., 1857. A catalogue of the zoophytes of Northumberland and Durham. Trans. Tyneside Nat. Fid Cl., Vol. 3, pp. 91–162.Google Scholar
Allman, G. J., 1871–2. A Monograph of the Gymnoblastic or Tubularian Hydroids, 450 pp. London: Ray Soc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barth, L. G., 1934. The effect of constant electric current on the regeneration of certain hydroids. Physiol. Zool., Vol. 7, pp. 340–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barth, L. G., 1938. Oxygen as a controlling factor in the regeneration of Tubularia. Physiol. Zool., Vol. 11, pp. 179–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berrill, N. J., 1949. The polymorphic transformations of Obelia. Q. Jl microsc. Sci., Vol. 90, pp. 235–64.Google Scholar
Berrill, N. J., 1952. Growth and form in gymnoblastic hydroids. V. Growth cycle in Tubularia. J. Morph., Vol. 90, pp. 583–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Child, C. M., 1907. An analysis of form-regulation in Tubularia. I. Stolon-formation and polarity. Arch EntwMech. Org., Bd. 23, pp. 396–444.Google Scholar
Child, C. M., 1919. The axial gradients in Hydrozoa. II. Susceptibility in relation to physiological axes, regions of colony and stages of development in certain hydroids. Biol. Bull. mar. biol. Lab., Woods Hole, Vol. 37, pp. 101–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Child, C. M., 1923. The axial gradients in Hydrozoa. V. Experimental axiol transformations in hydroids. Biol. Bull. mar. biol. lab., Woods Hole, Vol. 45, pp. 181–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Child, C. M., 1925. The axial gradients in Hydrozoa. VII. Modification of development through differential susceptibility. Biol. Bull. mar. biol. Lab., Woods Hole, Vol. 48, pp. 176–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Child, C. M., 1928 a. Experimental transformations of bipolar forms in Corymorpha palma. Biol. Bull. mar. biol. Lab., Woods Hole, Vol. 54, pp. 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Child, C. M., 1928 b. Physiological polarity and dominance in the holdfast system of Corymorpha. Biol. Bull. mar. biol. Lab., Woods Hole, Vol. 54, pp. 15–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Child, C. M. & Watanabe, Y., 1935. Differential reduction of methylene blue by Corymorpha palma. Physiol. Zool., Vol. 8, pp. 417–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowell, S., 1953. The regression-replacement cycle of hydranths of Obelia and Campanularia. Physiol. Zool., Vol. 26, pp. 319–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowell, S., 1957. Differential responses of growth zones to nutritive level, age, and temperature in the colonial hydroid Campanularia. J. exp. Zool., Vol. 134, pp. 63–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crowell, S. & Wyttenbach, C., 1957. Factors effecting terminal growth in the hydroid Campanularia. Biol. mar. biol. Bull. Lab., Woods Hole, Vol. 113, pp. 223–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forbes, E., 1848. A Monograph of the British Naked-eyed Medusae. 101 pp. London: Ray Soc.Google Scholar
Gast, R. & Godlewski, E., 1903. Die Regulationserscheinungen bei Pennaria cavolinii. Arch. EntwMech. Org., Bd. 16, pp. 76–116.Google Scholar
Hammett, F. S., 1943. The role of the amino acids and nucleic acid components in developmental growth. I. The growth of an Obelia hydranth. Chapter I. Description of Obelia and its growth. Growth, Vol. 7, pp. 331–99.Google Scholar
Hancock, D. A., Drinnan, R. E. & Harris, W. N., 1956. Notes on the biology of Sertularia argentea L. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 35, pp. 307–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hincks, T., 1868. A History of the British Hydroid Zoophytes, Vol, 1, 338 pp. London: John Van Voorst.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyman, L. H., 1920. The axial gradients in Hydrozoa. III. Experiments on the gradient of Tubularia. Biol. Bull. mar. biol. Lab., Woods Hole, Vol. 38, pp. 353–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovén, S. L., 1836. Bidrag till kannedomen af slagtena Campanularia och Syncoryna. K. svenska VetenskAkad. Handl., 1835, pp. 260–81.Google Scholar
Lund, E. J., 1924. Experimental control of organic polarity bythe electric current. IV. The quantitative relations between currrent density, orientation, and inhibition of regeneration. J. exp. Zool., Vol. 39, pp. 357–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lund, E. J., 1926. The electrical polarity of Obelia and frog's skin and its reversible inhibition by cyanide, ether, and chloroform. J. exp. Zool., Vol. 44, pp. 383–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackie, G. O., 1966. Growth of the hydroid Tubularia in culture. In The Cnidaria and their Evolution, ed. by Rees, W. J.. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, T. H., 1903. Some factors in the regeneration of Tubularia. Arch. EntwMech. Org., ed. 16, pp. 125–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rees, W. J. & Russell, F. S., 1937. On rearing the hydroids of certain medusae, with an account of the methods used. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 22, pp. 61–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosene, H. V. & Lund, E. J., 1930. Evidence from the effects of KNC for linkage between polar growth, electric potentials and cell oxidation in Obelia. Publs Puget Sound mar. Biol. Stn, Vol. 7, PP. 337–44.Google Scholar
Russell, F. S., 1953. The Medusae of the British Isles, Vol. I. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tardent, P., 1963. Regeneration in the Hydrozoa. Biol. Rev., Vol. 38, pp. 293–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watanabe, Y., 1935. Physiological dominance in Corymorpha palma in relation to reconstitution and methylene blue reduction. Physiol. Zool., Vol. 8, pp. 417–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar