Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:14:07.809Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the faunas inhabiting intertidal seaweeds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

John Colman
John Colman
Affiliation:
Sheffield University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This paper gives an account of a survey of the invertebrate populations (omitting Protozoa) of eight species of seaweeds on Church Reef, Wembury Bay, extending over the entire intertidal range.

Above high-water neaps the faunas are poor, except for that in Lichina pygmaea which is the richest in individuals on the shore.

Between high-water neaps and low-water springs the most numerous groups are copepods, acarines, young littorinids and (in Ascophyllum only) ostracods.

In the holdfasts of Laminaria digitata polychaetes are very abundant and make up the majority of the population.

The intertidal faunas are compared with those in the soil on land, and prove to be far more abundant. Even the most plentiful group in the soil, the insects, is rarely as numerous as it is in Ascophyllum around mean sea-level.

Altogether 177 species are recorded, of which 35 are not in the Plymouth Marine Fauna (1931).

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 24 , Issue 1 , January 1940 , pp. 129 - 183
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1940

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCE

Baweja, K. D., 1939. Studies of the soil fauna, with special reference to the recolonization of sterilized soil. Journ. Anim. Ecol., Vol. VIII, No. 1, pp. 120–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bokenham, N. A. H, Neugebauer, F. L. M. & Stephenson, T. A., 1938. The vertical distribution of certain intertidal marine gastropods in False Bay, with notes on the development of two of them. Ann. Natal Mus., Vol. IX, part I, pp. 113–37.Google Scholar
Bowerbank, J. S., 1866. A monograph of the British Spongiadae. Ray Soc. Publ., Vol. II, pp. 1–388.Google Scholar
Cameron, A. E., 1917. The insect association of a local environment complex in the district of Holmes Chapel, Cheshire. Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinb., Vol. LII, No. 2, pp. 37–78.Google Scholar
Chevrel, René, 1903. Scopelodromus isemerinus. Genre nouveau et espèce nouvelle de Diptères Marins. Arch. Zool. Exp. Gén., Series 4, Vol. I, pp. 1–28.Google Scholar
Chevreux, E. & Fage, L., 1925. Amphipodes, in Faune de France, pp. 1–488.Google Scholar
Collinge, W. E., 1917. A revision of the British Idoteidae, a family of marine Isopoda. Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinb., Vol. LI, pp. 721–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colman, John, 1933. The nature of the intertidal zonation of plants and animals. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XVIII, pp. 435–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ditlevsen, H., 1928. Free-living marine Nemetodes from Greenland waters. Medd. om Gronland, Copenhagen, XXIII, Supp. pp. 201–50.Google Scholar
Edwards, F. W., 1926. Marine Chironomidae. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 1926, Part 2, pp. 779–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elmhirst, R. & Stephenson, J., 1926. On Lumbricillus scoticus n.sp. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XIV, pp. 469–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elton, Charles, 1927. Animal Ecology. London. Pp. 1–207.Google Scholar
Fauvel, P., 1923. Polychètes errantes. Faune de France, Vol. V, pp. 1–488.Google Scholar
Fauvel, P., 1927. Polychètes sèdentaires. Faune de France, Vol. XVI, pp. 1–494.Google Scholar
Ford, J., 1935. The animal population of a meadow near Oxford. Journ. Anim. Ecol., Vol. IV, pp. 195–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, J., 1937. Fluctuations in natural populations of Collembola and Acarina. Journ. Anim. Ecol., Vol. VI, pp. 98–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, J., 1938. Fluctuations in natural populations of Collembola and Acarina. Part 2. Journ. Anim. Ecol., Vol. VII, pp. 350–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurney, Robert, 1933. Notes on some Copepoda from Plymouth. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XIX, pp. 299–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halbert, J. N., 1920. The Acarina of the seashore. Proc. Roy. Irish Acad., Vol. XXXV B, pp. 106–52.Google Scholar
Imms, A. D. 1923. (Chapter 9 in Russell, 1923, q.v.)Google Scholar
Linke, O., 1933. Morphologie und Physiologie des Genitalapparates der Nordseelittorinen. Wiss. Meeresuntersuch., Vol. XIX, Part 5, pp. 1–60.Google Scholar
Marine Biological Association, 1931. Plymouth Marine Fauna (2nd Edition).Google Scholar
Monod, Th., 1926. Les Gnathiidae. Essai monographique. Mém. Soc. Sci. Nat. Maroc, Vol. XIII, pp. 1–668.Google Scholar
Moore, Hilary B., 1935. The biology of Balanus balanoides. IV. Relation to environmental factors. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XX, pp. 279–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, H. M., 1920. Observations on the insect fauna of permanent pasture in Cheshire. Ann. Appl. Biol., Vol. VII, pp. 141–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, H. M., 1922. The insect and other invertebrate fauna of arable land at Rothamsted. Ann. Appl. Biol., Vol. IX, pp. 282–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orton, J. H., 1929. Observations on Patella vulgata. Part m. Habitat and habits. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XVI, pp. 277–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Percival, E., 1929. A report on the fauna of the estuaries of the River Tamar and the River Lynher. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XVI, pp. 81–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, J., 1923. The micro-organisms of the soil. London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sars, G. O., 1899. An Account of the Crustacea of Norway. Vol. II, Isopoda, pp. 1–270.Google Scholar
Sars, G. O., 1911. An Account of the Crustacea of Norway. Vol. V, Copepoda Harpacticoida, pp. 1–449.Google Scholar
Stekhoven, J. H. S., 1935. Nematoda Errantia. Tierwelt. Nord- u. Ostsee, Lief. 28, Teil v B, pp. 1–173.Google Scholar
Stephenson, J., 1932. Oligochaeta from Australia, North Carolina and other parts of the world. Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 1932, pp. 899–941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thienemann, A., 1915. Zur Kentniss der Salzwasser-Chironomiden. Arch. Hydrobiol. Plankt., Supp. Bd. II, pp. 443–71.Google Scholar
Viets, K., 1927a. Die Halacaridae der Nordsee. Zeit. wiss. Zool., Vol. CXXX, pp. 84–173.Google Scholar
Viets, K., 1927b. Halacaridae. Tierwelt Nord- u. Ostsee, Lief. 10, Teil XI c, pp. 1–72.Google Scholar