Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T01:47:57.810Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Notes on the Pycnogonida of Plymouth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Marie V. Lebour
Affiliation:
Naturalist at the Plymouth Laboratory

Extract

The Pycnogonida of Plymouth have had very little attention and early records are few. Of the eight species recorded in the Plymouth Marine Invertebrate Fauna in 1904, two, Nymphon gallicum and N. gracile, are synonymous, and these two are also recorded in the 1931 edition which comprises only the same eight species. The scarcity of the records shows that little search was made for the members of this group, for on revising it at the present time it is found that thirteen species certainly occur, being five more than are shown in the Marine Invertebrate Fauna. Hodgson (1910) records thirteen species from Devonshire, but these are not all the same as the thirteen now recorded. He mentions eleven from Plymouth, three of which have not been found recently. These are Pallene spectrum, Nymphon brevirostre and Ammothea laevis.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1945

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bouvier, E. L., 1923. Faune deFrance, 7, Pycnogonides, pp. 168.Google Scholar
Calman, W. T., 1915. Pycnogonida. British Antarctic ([TerraNova]) Expedition, 1910, Zool., Vol. III, pp. 174.Google Scholar
Calman, W. T., 1923. Pycnogonida of the Indian Museum. Rec. Ind. Mus., Vol. XXV, pp. 265–99.Google Scholar
Carpenter, G. H., 1905. The marine fauna of the coast of Ireland. Part VI. Pycnogonida. Rep. Fish. (Ireland) Sci. Inv. Dublin, Vol. 4, pp. 171–8.Google Scholar
Cole, L. J., 1904. Pycnogonida of the west coast of North America. Harriman Alaska Expedition, Vol. X, pp. 24–98.Google Scholar
Colman, J., 1940. On the faunas inhabiting intertidal seaweeds. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XXIV pp. 129–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawshay, L. R., 1912. On the fauna of the English Channel. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. IX, p. 292.Google Scholar
Dogiel, V., 1911. A short account of work on Pycnogonida done during June, 1911, at Cullercoats. Northumberland Sea Fish. Comm. Rep. Sci. Inv., pp. 26–7.Google Scholar
Dogiel, V., 1913. Embryologische Studien an Pantopoden. Zeitschr.f. wiss. Zool., Bd. 107, pp. 576741.Google Scholar
Dohrn, A., 1881. Die Pantopoden des Golfes von Neapel, pp. 1252. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Elmhirst, R., 1911. List of Pycnogonida collected in the Clyde Area. Trans. Nat. Hist. Soc. Glasgow, Vol. 8, pp. 146–9.Google Scholar
Giltay, L., 1928. Notes sur les Pycnogonides de la Belgique. Bull. Ann. Soc. ent. Belg., T. 68, pp. 193229.Google Scholar
Giltay, L., 1929. Quelques Pycnogonides des environs de Banyuls (France). Bull. Ann. Soc. ent. Belg., T. 69, pp. 172–6.Google Scholar
Gosse, P. H., 1855. A Manual of Marine Zoology for the British Isles. Part I.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helfer, H., 1926. Die Tierwelt der Nord- und Ostsee. Lief, XXXI, Teil XI. a. 3. Pantopoda (2. Nachtrag), pp. 15.Google Scholar
Helfer, H. & Schlottke, E., 1935. Pantopoda in Bronn's Klassen und Ordnungen des Tierreichs. Bd. 5, Abt. IV, Buch 2, pp. 1314.Google Scholar
Hodge, G., 1861. Observations on a species of Pycnogon (Phoxichilidium coccineum Johnston) with an attempt to explain the order of its development. Trans. Tyneside Nat. Fld. Clb., Vol. V, pp. 124–36. (Also in Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. 1862, Ser. 3, Vol. IX, pp. 33–43.)Google Scholar
Hodge, G., 1863. Report on the Pycnogonoidea, with description of two new species. Trans. Tyneside Nat. Fld. Clb., Vol. V, pp. 281–3. (Also in Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., 1863, Ser. 3, Vol. XI, p. 463.)Google Scholar
Hodge, G., 1864. List of the British Pycnogonoidea with description of several new species. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., Ser. 3, Vol. XIII, pp. 113–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, T. V., 1910. The Pycnogonida of Devonshire. Trans. Devon. Ass. for the Advanc. of Sci. Lit. and Arts, Vol. XLII, pp. 425–39.Google Scholar
Hoek, P. P. C., 1881. Nouvelles études sur les Pycnogonides. Arch. Zool. Exp. et Gén., T. XI, pp. 445542.Google Scholar
Lebour, M. V., 1917. Notes on the life history of Anaphia petiolata (Krøyer). Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc, Vol. XI, pp. 51–6.Google Scholar
Loman, J. C. C., 1907. Biologische Beobachtungen an einem Pantopoden. Tijd. Ned. Dierk. Ver., Ser. 2, Bd. 10, pp. 225–84.Google Scholar
Loman, J. C. C., 1908. Die Pantopoden der Siboga Expedition.Leiden.Google Scholar
Marcus, E., 1940. Os Pantopoda brasilieros e os demais sul-americanos. Boll. da Faculd. de filos-ciencias e letras, Vol. XIX, pp. 1141.Google Scholar
Norman, A. M., 1894. A month on the Trondhjem Fiord. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., Ser. 6, Vol. 13, pp. 150–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norman, A. M., 1908. The Podosomata (Pycnogonida) of the Temperate Atlantic and Arctic Oceans. Linn. Soc. Journ. Zool., Vol. XXX, pp. 198238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sars, G. O., 1891. Pycnogonidea. The Norwegian North Atlantic Expedition 1876–1878. Christiania, pp. 1163.Google Scholar
Schlottke, E., 1932. Die Pantopoden der deutschen Küsten. Wiss. Meeresunters. (N.F.) Abt. Helgoland. Bd. 18, Hft.3, Abh. 9, pp. 110.Google Scholar
WiLson, E. B., 1878. Description of two new genera of Pycnogonida. Amer. Journ. Sci. & Art., Ser. 3, Vol. 15, pp. 200–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiren, E., 1918. Zur Morphologie und Phylogenie der Pantopoden. Zool. Bid. från Uppsala, Bd. 6, pp. 42181.Google Scholar