Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T03:32:52.548Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

New species of the genus Ophiolepis Müller & Troschel, 1840 (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea: Ophiolepididae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 September 2017

Tania Pineda-Enríquez ,
Guadalupe Bribiesca-Contreras ,
Francisco A. Solís-Marín ,
Alfredo Laguarda-Figueras  and
Timothy O'Hara
Tania Pineda-Enríquez*
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Division of Invertebrate Zoology, Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, 1659 Dickinson Hall, Gainesville, 32611, Florida, USA Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, 900 Exposition Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90007, USA
Guadalupe Bribiesca-Contreras*
Affiliation:
Museums Victoria, GPO Box 666, Melbourne 3001, Australia School of Biosciences, Faculty of Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia
Francisco A. Solís-Marín
Affiliation:
Laboratorio de Sistemática y Ecología de Equinodermos, Instituto de Ciencias del Mar y Limnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Circuito Universitario s/n, México D.F. 04510, México
Alfredo Laguarda-Figueras
Affiliation:
Laboratorio de Sistemática y Ecología de Equinodermos, Instituto de Ciencias del Mar y Limnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Circuito Universitario s/n, México D.F. 04510, México
Timothy O'Hara
Affiliation:
Museums Victoria, GPO Box 666, Melbourne 3001, Australia
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: T. Pineda-Enríquez and G. Bribiesca-Contreras Department of Biology, Division of Invertebrate Zoology, Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, 1659 Dickinson Hall, Gainesville, 32611, Florida, USA; Museums Victoria, GPO Box 666, Melbourne 3001, Australia. Email: [email protected]
Correspondence should be addressed to: T. Pineda-Enríquez and G. Bribiesca-Contreras Department of Biology, Division of Invertebrate Zoology, Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, 1659 Dickinson Hall, Gainesville, 32611, Florida, USA; Museums Victoria, GPO Box 666, Melbourne 3001, Australia. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The aim of the present work is to report and describe three new species of the tropical brittle-star genus Ophiolepis. The new species are described herein as Ophiolepis aemulata sp. nov., Ophiolepis buitronae sp. nov. and Ophiolepis crebra sp. nov. As these species were previously misidentified, morphological traits and similarities between them and other species are extensively discussed. Ophiolepis buitronae sp. nov. is widespread in tropical and warm waters of the western Atlantic from intertidal to 36 m. It has consistently been misidentified as Ophiolepis impressa as these two species share a similar distribution and are found together. Ophiolepis aemulata sp. nov. is found in western Australia, as are its congeners Ophiolepis superba and Ophiolepis unicolor, while Ophiolepis crebra sp. nov. is found in Australia and Indonesia. There are 25 extant species, including the three new species, which are currently referred to the genus Ophiolepis.

Keywords

Ophiolepis crebraOphiolepis aemulataOphiolepis impressaOphiolepis buitronaemorphologyOphiolepididae
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 98 , Special Issue 8: Special Section: European Marine Biology Symposium Papers 2018 , December 2018 , pp. 2049 - 2065
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alvarado, J.J. and Solís-Marín, F.A. (2013) Echinoderm research and diversity in Latin America. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Baker, A.N. (1979) Some Ophiuroidea from the Tasman Sea and adjacent waters. New Zealand Journal of Zoology 6, 21–51.Google Scholar
Blainville, H.M. (1834) Manuel d'actinologie ou de zoophytologie. Vol. 1. FG Levrault.Google Scholar
Bribiesca-Contreras, G., Solis-Marin, F.A., Laguarda-Figueras, A. and Zaldivar-Riveron, A. (2013) Identification of echinoderms (Echinodermata) from an anchialine cave in Cozumel Island, Mexico, using DNA barcodes. Molecular Ecology Resources 13, 1137–1145.Google Scholar
Brock, J. (1888) Ophiuridenfauna des indischen Archipels. Zeitschrift für wissenschaftliche Zoologie 47, 465–539.Google Scholar
Cherbonnier, G. and Guille, A. (1978) Ophiurides. Paris: Editions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS).Google Scholar
Clark, A.H. (1921) Report on the ophiurans. University of Iowa Studies in Natural History 9, 29–63.Google Scholar
Clark, A.H. (1922) The ophiurans of the Island of Curacao. Bijdragen tot de Dierkunde uitgegeven door het Koninklijk Zoölogisch Genootschap Natura Artis Magistra te Amsterdam 22, 209–213.Google Scholar
Clark, A.H. (1939) Echinoderms of the Smithsonian-Hartford Expedition, 1937, with other West Indian records. Proceedings of the U.S. National Museum 86, 441–456.Google Scholar
Clark, A.H. (1954) Echinoderms (other than holothurians) of the Gulf of Mexico. In Galtsoff, P.S. (ed.) Gulf of Mexico, its origin, waters and marine life. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services Fisheries Bulletin 55, 373–379.Google Scholar
Clark, A.M. and Melville, R.V. (1976) Ophiolepis Müller & Troschel, 1840, request for designation of a type-species under the plenary powers. Z.N.(S.) 2097. Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature 32, 268–269.Google Scholar
Clark, A.M. and Rowe, F.W.E. (1971) Monograph of shallow-water Indo-West Pacific echinoderms. Trustees of the British Museum (Natural History) i–vii, 1–238.Google Scholar
Clark, H.L. (1901) The echinoderms of Puerto Rico. U.S. Commission of Fish and Fisheries Bulletin for 1900 2, 231–263.Google Scholar
Clark, H.L. (1908) Some Japanese and East Indian echinoderms. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology 51, 279–311.Google Scholar
Clark, H.L. (1915) The echinoderms of Ceylon other than holothurians. Spolia Zeylandica 10, 83–102.Google Scholar
Clark, H.L. (1919) The distribution of the littoral echinoderms of the West Indies. (1. West Indian littoral echinoderms. II. Littoral echinoderm fauna of West Indian Islands and adjacent regions). Papers from the Department of Marine Biology, Carnegie Institution of Washington 281, 49–74.Google Scholar
Clark, H.L. (1933) Scientific survey of Porto Rico and Virgin Islands. Part I. A handbook of the littoral echinoderms of Puerto Rico and the other West Indian Islands. New York Academy of Science 16, 1–147.Google Scholar
Clark, H.L. (1938) Echinoderms from Australia, an account of collections made in 1929 and 1932. Memoirs of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard College 55, 1–596.Google Scholar
Clark, H.L. (1940) XXI. Notes on echinoderms from the West Coast of Central America. Eastern Pacific expeditions of the New York Zoological Society. Zoologica Scripta 25, 331–352.Google Scholar
Devaney, D.M. (1974) Shallow-water echinoderms from British Honduras, with a description of a new species of Ophiocoma (Ophiuroidea). Bulletin of Marine Science 24, 122–164.Google Scholar
Domantay, J.S. and Domantay, C.R. (1966) Studies on the classification and distribution of Philippine littoral Ophiuroidea (brittle stars). Philippine Journal of Science 95, 1–77.Google Scholar
Duncan, M.P. (1887) On the Ophiuridae of the Mergui Archipielago, collected for the Trustees of the Indian Museum, Calcutta by Dr. John Anderson, F.R.S. Superintendent of the Museum. Linnean Society Journal of Zoology 21, 85–120.Google Scholar
Fell, H.B. (1960) Synoptic keys to the genera of Ophiuroidea. Zoology Publications, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand 26, 1–44.Google Scholar
Fujita, T. (2016) Brittle stars of Ophiodermatidae and Ophiolepididae (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea: Ophiurida: Ophiurina) collected from the Singapore Strait. Raffles Bulletin of Zoology (Supplement 34), 619–626.Google Scholar
Gondim, A., Alonso, C., Pereira Dias, T., Castro Manso, C. and Christoffersen, M.L. (2013) A taxonomic guide to the brittle-stars (Echinodermata, Ophiuroidea) from the State of Paraíba continental shelf, Northeastern Brazil. ZooKeys 307, 45–96. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.307.4673.Google Scholar
Hendler, G. (1975) Adaptational significance of the patterns of ophiuroid development. American Zoologist 15, 691–715.Google Scholar
Hendler, G. (1979) Sex-reversal and viviparity in Ophiolepis kieri n. sp., with notes on viviparous brittlestars from the Caribbean (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea). Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 92, 783–795.Google Scholar
Hendler, G. (1988) Western Atlantic Ophiolepis (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea): a description of O. pawsoni new species, and a key to the species. Bulletin of Marine Science 42, 265–272.Google Scholar
Hendler, G., Miller, J.E., Pawson, D.L. and Kier, P.M. (1995) Sea stars, sea urchins, and their allies: echinoderms of Florida and the Caribbean. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
Hendler, G. and Turner, R.L. (1987) Two new species of Ophiolepis (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea) from the Caribbean Sea and Gulf of Mexico: with notes on ecology, reproduction and morphology. Contributions in Science (Los Angeles) 395, 1–14Google Scholar
Hotchkiss, F.H.C. (1982) Ophiuroidea (Echinodermata) from Carrie Bow Cay, Belize. In Rützel, K. and Macintyre, I.C. (eds) The Atlantic barrier reef ecosystem at Carrie Bow Cay, Belize, structure and communities. Smithsonian Contributions to Marine Sciences 12, 387–412.Google Scholar
International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature (1981) Opinion 1187 Ophiolepis Müller & Troschel 1840 (Ophiuroidea): designation of type species. Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature 38, 191–193.Google Scholar
Koehler, R. (1898) Echinoides et Ophiures provenant des campagnes du yacht l'Hirondelle (Golfe de Gascogne, Acores, Terre-Nueve). Résultats des Campagnes scientifiques par Prince Albert I, Monaco 12, 1–78.Google Scholar
Koehler, R. (1907) Revision de la collection des Ophiures du Museum d'histoire Naturelle Paris. Bulletin Sciences de la France et de la Belgique 41, 279–351.Google Scholar
Koehler, R. (1914) Echinoderma I. Asteroidea, Ophiuroidea et Echinoidea. In Michaelsen, W. (ed.) Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Meeresfauna Westafrikas 1. Hamburg: L. Friederichsen and Co., pp. 127–303.Google Scholar
Lewis, J.B. and Bray, R.D. (1983) Community structure of ophiuroids (Echinodermata) from three different habitats on a coral reef in Barbados, West Indies. Marine Biology 73, 171–176.Google Scholar
Ljungman, A.V. (1866) Om några nya arter af Ophiurider. Öfversigt af Kongliga Vetenskaps-Akademiens Förhandlingar 23, 163–166.Google Scholar
Ljungman, A.V. (1867) Ophiuroidea viventia huc usque cognita enumerat. Öfversigt af Kongl. Öfversigt af Kongliga Vetenskaps-Akademiens Förhandlingar 23, 303–336.Google Scholar
Lütken, C. (1856) Additamenta ad historiam Ophiuridarum. Anden Afdelning. Det kongelige danske Videnskabernes Selskabs Skrifter. 5. Raekke, Naturvidenskabelig og mathematisk Afdelning 5, 177–271.Google Scholar
Lütken, C. (1859) Bidrag til Kundskab om de ved Kysterne af Mellem og Syd–Amerika levende Arter af Söstjerner. Videnskabelige Meddelelser Dansk Naturhistorisk Forening 25–96.Google Scholar
Lyman, T. (1865) I. Ophiuridae and astrophytidae. Illustrated catalogue of the museum of comparative zoology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard College.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, H. (1915) A new classification of the Ophiuroidea with description of new genera and species. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 68, 43–92.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, H. (1917) A monograph of Japanese Ophiuroidea, arranged according to a new classification. Journal of the College of Science, Imperial University, Tokyo 38, 1–408.Google Scholar
McKnight, D.G. (2003) New brittle-stars (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea) from New Zealand waters. Zootaxa 352, 1–36.Google Scholar
Müller, J. and Troschel, F.H. (1840) Ueber die Gattungen der Ophiuren. Archiv für Naturgeschichte 6, 326–330.Google Scholar
Müller, J. and Troschel, F.H. (1842) System der Asteriden.1. Asteriae. 2. Ophiuridae. Braunschweig: Vieweg.Google Scholar
Murakami, S. (1943) Report on the ophiuran of Palao, Caroline Islands. Journal of the Department of Agriculture, Kyüsyü Imperial University 7, 159–204.Google Scholar
Nielsen, E. (1932) Papers from Dr. Th. Mortensen's Pacific Expedition 1914–1916 – 59. – Ophiurans from the Gulf of Panama, California, and the Strait of Georgia. Videnskabelige Meddelelser fra Dansk Naturhistorisk Forening 91, 241–346.Google Scholar
O'Hara, T.D., Hugall, A.F., Thuy, B., Stöhr, S. and Martynov, A.V. (2017) Restructuring higher taxonomy using broad-scale phylogenomics: the living Ophiuroidea. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 107, 415–430.Google Scholar
Pineda-Enriquez, T., Solis-Marin, F.A. and Laguarda-Figueras, A. (2014) Revision of the genus Ophioteichus H.L. Clark, 1938 (Ophiuroidea: Ophiolepididae). Zootaxa 3784, 241–250.Google Scholar
Pomory, C.M. (2007) Key to the common shallow-water brittle stars (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea) of the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean Sea. Caribbean Journal of Science, Special Publication 10, 1–42.Google Scholar
Say, T. (1825) On the species of the Linnaean genus Asterias inhabiting the coast of the U.S. Journal of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 5, 141–154.Google Scholar
Stöhr, S., O'Hara, T.D. and Thuy, B. (2012) Global diversity of brittle stars (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea). PLoS ONE 7, e31940.Google Scholar
Stöhr, S., O'Hara, T.D. and Thuy, B. (2017) World Ophiuroidea database. http://marinespecies.org/ophiuroidea.Google Scholar
Studer, T. (1882) Übersicht über die Ophiuriden, welche während der Reise S.M.S. “Gazelle” um die Erde 1874–76 gesammelt wurden. Phys. Abh. königl. Akad. Wiss., Berlin. 34, 1–37.Google Scholar
Thuy, B. and Stöhr, S. (2016) A new morphological phylogeny of the Ophiuroidea (Echinodermata) accords with molecular evidence and renders microfossils accessible for cladistics. PLoS ONE 11, e0156140.Google Scholar
Tommasi, L.R. (1970) Os ofiuróides recentes do Brasil e de regiôes vizinhas. Contribuicoes Avulsas do Instituto Oceanográfico, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Série Oceanografia Biológica 20, 1–146.Google Scholar
Verrill, A.E. (1899) Report on the Ophiuroidea collected by the Bahama expedition in 1893. Bulletin from the Laboratories of Natural History of the State University of Iowa 5, 1–86.Google Scholar
Woolley, S.N., Tittensor, D.P., Dunstan, P.K., Guillera-Arroita, G., Lahoz-Monfort, J.J., Wintle, B.A., Worm, B. and O'Hara, T.D., (2016) Deep-sea diversity patterns are shaped by energy availability. Nature 533, 393–396.Google Scholar
Ziesenhenne, F.C. (1940) New ophiurans of the Allan Hancock Pacific expeditions. Allan Hancock Pacific Expeditions 8, 5–58.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Pineda-Enríquez et al Bruckart supplementary material

Appendix

Download Pineda-Enríquez et al Bruckart supplementary material(File)
File 76.1 KB