Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:50:32.237Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A new species of Thaumastoderma (Gastrotricha: Macrodasyida) from the Antarctic deep sea with a phylogenetic analysis of the whole genus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 September 2009

Alexander Kieneke*
Affiliation:
Forschungsinstitut und Naturmuseum Senckenberg, German Centre for Marine Biodiversity Research (DZMB), Südstrand 44, 26382, Wilhelmshaven, Germany
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: A. Kieneke, Forschungsinstitut und Naturmuseum Senckenberg, German Centre for Marine Biodiversity Research (DZMB), Südstrand 44, 26382, Wilhelmshaven, Germany email: [email protected]

Abstract

A new species of the marine gastrotrich taxon Thaumastoderma is described. A single specimen of this species, Thaumastoderma antarctica sp. nov., was extracted from silty sediment sampled at one station of the Andeep-1 cruise, about 150 km to the north of the South Shetland Islands (Drake Passage, South Atlantic Ocean). This paper provides the first record of this genus from the deep sea and the second description of a macrodasyid gastrotrich living in an abyssal habitat. The new species is characterized by several apomorphic features, among them a caudal pair of strongly elongated dorsal cirrata tubes. A phylogenetic analysis of the genus Thaumastoderma reveals that Th. antarctica is closely related to Th. coronarium and Th. appendiculatum. Furthermore, the analysis offers an evolutionary scenario and a hypothesis for the internal phylogeny of this taxon while supporting its monophyly. It is the first time a cladistic analysis has been conducted for a delimited group of gastrotrichs, i.e. for all known members of a genus.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Brandt, A., Gooday, A.J., Brandão, S.N., Brix, S., Brökeland, W., Cedhagen, T., Choudhury, M., Cornelius, N., Danis, B., De Mesel, I., Diaz, R.J., Gillan, D.C., Ebbe, B., Howe, J.A., Janussen, D., Kaiser, S., Linse, K., Malyutina, M., Pawlowski, J., Raupach, M. and Vanreusel, A. (2007) First insights into the biodiversity and biogeography of the Southern Ocean deep sea. Nature 447, 307311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bremer, K. (1988) The limits of amino acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. Evolution 42, 795803.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bremer, K. (1994) Branch support and tree stability. Cladistics 10, 295304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clausen, C. (2004) Gastrotricha from the Faroe Bank. Sarsia 89, 423458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felsenstein, J. (1985) Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39, 783791.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gagné, G.D. (1980) Ultrastructure of the sensory palps of Tetranchyroderma papii (Gastrotricha, Macrodasyida). Zoomorphologie 95, 115125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, K.H. (2006) New Ancorabolinae Sars, 1909 (Copepoda: Harpacticoida: Ancorabolidae) of the Atlantic and the Pacific Ocean. The taxa Ceratonotus Sars, and Dendropsyllus Conroy-Dalton. Meiofauna Marina 15, 87122.Google Scholar
George, K.H. and Plum, C. (2009) Description of two new species of Dorsiceratus Drzycimski, 1967 (Copepoda: Harpacticoida: Ancorabolidae) from Sedlo and Seine Seamounts (Northeastern Atlantic) and remarks on the phylogenetic status of the genus. Zootaxa 2096, 257286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutzmann, E., Martínez Arbizu, P., Rose, A. and Veit-Köhler, G. (2004) Meiofauna communities along an abyssal depth gradient in the Drake Passage. Deep-Sea Research 51, 16171628.Google Scholar
Hochberg, R. and Litvaitis, M.K. (2000) Phylogeny of Gastrotricha: a morphology-based framework of Gastrotrich relationships. Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole 198, 299305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hummon, W.D. (2008) Gastrotricha of the North Atlantic Ocean: 1. Twenty four new and two redescribed species of Macrodasyida. Meiofauna Marina 16, 117174.Google Scholar
Kieneke, A. and Zekely, J. (2007) Desmodasys abyssalis sp. nov.—first record of a deep sea gastrotrich from hydrothermal vents. JMBA 2 Biodiversity Records 5895 (see Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 87, 1791–1792.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kieneke, A., Riemann, O. and Ahlrichs, W.H. (2008) Novel implications for the basal internal relationships of Gastrotricha revealed by an analysis of morphological characters. Zoologica Scripta 37, 429460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kisielewski, J. (1991) Inland-water Gastrotricha from Brasil. Annales Zoologici 43 Suplement 2, 1168.Google Scholar
Lee, D.-C. and Bryant, H.N. (1999) A reconsideration of the coding of inapplicable characters: assumptions and problems. Cladistics 15, 373378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maddison, W.P. and Maddison, D.R. (1989) Interactive analysis of phylogeny and character evolution using the computer program MacClade. Folia Primatologica 53, 190202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maddison, D.R., Swofford, D.L. and Maddison, W.P. (1997) NEXUS: an extendible file format for systematic information. Systematic Biology 46, 590621.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maddison, D.R. and Maddison, W.P. (2000) MacClade. Analysis of phylogeny and character evolution. Version 4.0. [Computer software and manual]. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
Marotta, R., Guidi, L., Pierboni, L., Ferraguti, M., Todaro, M.A. and Balsamo, M. (2005) Sperm ultrastructure of Macrodasys caudatus (Gastrotricha: Macrodasyida) and a sperm-based phylogenetic analysis of Gastrotricha. Meiofauna Marina 14, 921.Google Scholar
Martínez Arbizu, P. (2003) Species diversity of benthic copepods and loriciferans in the Southern Ocean. Berichte zur Polar- und Meeresforschung 470, 5657.Google Scholar
Müller, K. (2004) PRAP: computation of Bremer support for large data sets. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 31, 780782.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Page, R.D.M. (2001a) NDE: nexus data editor version 0.5.0 [Computer software]. Available via http://taxonomy.zoology.gla.ac.uk/rod/rod.htmlGoogle Scholar
Page, R.D.M. (2001b) TreeView version 1.6.5 [Computer software]. Available via http://taxonomy.zoology.gla.ac.uk/rod/rod.htmlGoogle Scholar
Radziejewska, T. (2002) Responses of deep-sea meiobenthic communities to sediment disturbance simulating effects of polymetallic nodule mining. International Review of Hydrobiology 87, 457477.3.0.CO;2-3>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riemann, O., Kieneke, A. and Ahlrichs, W.H. (2009) Phylogeny of Dicranophoridae (Rotifera: Monogononta)—a maximum parsimony analysis based on morphological characters. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 47, 6176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swofford, D.L. (2002) PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). Version 4. [Computer software and manual]. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
Todaro, M.A., Telford, M.J., Lockyer, A.E. and Littlewood, D.T.J. (2006) Interrelationships of Gastrotricha and their place among the Metazoa inferred from 18S rRNA genes. Zoologica Scripta 35, 251259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wandeness, A.P., George, K.H. and Santos, P.J.P. (2009) First record of the taxon Echinopsyllus Sars, 1909 (Copepoda, Harpacticoida, Ancorabolidae) from the deep sea of Campos Basin, Brazil, with the description of four new species. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 156, 5278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar