Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:55:37.273Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nervous Control of Stomach Movements in Dogfishes and Rays

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

J. Z. Young
J. Z. Young
Affiliation:
The Wellcome Institute for the History of Medicine, 183, Euston Road, London, and The Laboratory, Marine Biological Association, Citadel Hill, Plymouth *Reprint requests should be sent to the Wellcome Institute.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The organization of the alimentary canal of fishes differs greatly between species of different dietary habit, but is not well understood. The vagus and sympathetic systems are very different in elasmobranchs and teleosts, but there has been little work on the corresponding physiology and pharmacology. The digestive system of elasmobranchs has unusual features connected with the fact that the absorbtive surface is provided by the spiral intestine (Fig. 1). This is a short fat tube whose surface is greatly increased by the presence of a coiled fold, the spiral valve. This arrangement provides a large area for absorbtion, neatly packed, but it leaves only a narrow lumen, so that no large particles can pass along the spiral intestine. Presumably it is in connexion with this condition that the stomach is divided into two parts. The cardiac division is a large sac into which the prey is received whole, its wall is very glandular and much breakdown of the food proceeds there (Hogben, 1967). The pyloric division is a narrower tube, leading from the hind end of the cardiac part to the pylorus.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 60 , Issue 1 , February 1980 , pp. 1 - 17
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andrews, P. L. R., Salih, A. A. & Scratcherd, T., 1978. Modulation of a single efferent fibre discharge by gastric afferents in the ferret. Journal of Physiology, 284, 40P.Google ScholarPubMed
Babkin, B. P., Friedman, M. H. F. & Mackay-Sawyer, M. E., 1935. Vagal and sympathetic innervation of the stomach in the skate. Journal of the Biological Board of Canada, 1, 239–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bülbring, E. & Gershon, D., 1967. 5-HT participation in the vagal inhibitory pathway to the stomach. Journal of Physiology, 192, 823–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnstock, G., 1958. The effect of drugs on spontaneous motility and on response to stimulation of the extrinsic nerves of the gut of a teleostean fish. British Journal of Pharmacology and Chemotherapy, 13, 216–226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burnstock, G., 1975. Purinergic transmission. In Handbook of Psycho-pharmacology (ed. Iversen, et al. ) pp. 131–194. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Burnstock, G., Cocks, T., Paddle, B. & Staszewska-Barczak, J., 1975. Evidence that prostaglandin is responsible for ‘rebound contraction’ following stimulation of non-adrenergic, non-cholinergic (‘purinergic’) inhibitory nerves. European Journal of Pharmacology, 31, 360–362.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, G., 1975. Inhibitory vagal innervation of the stomach in fish. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 50C, 169–170.Google Scholar
Campbell, G. & Burnstock, G., 1968. Comparative physiology of gastrointestinal motility. In Handbook of Physiology, section 6, Alimentary Canal, vol. iv, Motilhy (ed. Code, C. F.). Washington, D.C.: American Physiological Society.Google Scholar
Clarke, M. R. & Stevens, J. D., 1974. Cephalopods, blue sharks and migration. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 54, 949–957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dreyer, N. B., 1949. The action of autonomic drugs on elasmobranch and teleost involuntary muscle. Archives internationales de pharmacodynamie et de thérapie, 78, 63–66.Google ScholarPubMed
Euler, U. S. V. & Östlund, E., 1957. Effects of certain biologically occurring substances on the isolated intestine of fish. Acta physiologica scandinavica, 38, 364–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaddum, J. & Szerb, J. C., 1961. Assay of substance P on goldfish intestine in a microbath. British Journal of Pharmacology and Chemotherapy, 17, 451–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grove, D. J. & Campbell, G., 1979. The role of extrinsic and intrinsic nerves in the co-ordination of gut motility in the stomachless flatfish Rhombosolea tapirina and Ammotrttis rostrata Guenther. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, 63C, 143–159.Google Scholar
Grove, D. J., O'neill, J. G. & Spillett, P. B., 1974. The action of 5-hydroxytryptamine on longitudinal gastric smooth muscle of the plaice, Pleuronectes platessa. Comparative and General Pharmacology, 5, 229–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogben, C. A. M., 1967. Secretion of acid by the dogfish, Squalus acanthias. In Sharks, Skates and Rays (ed. Gilbert, P. W., Mathewson, R. F. and Rail, D. P.), pp. 299–315. Baltimore: John Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Mann, J. & Prosser, L. C. 1963. Uterine response to 5-hydroxytryptamine in the clasper-siphon secretion of the spiny dogfish, Squalus acanthias. Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Mass., 125, 384–385.Google Scholar
Martinson, J., 1964. The effect of graded stimulation of efferent vagal nerve fibres on gastric motility. Acta physiologica scandinavica, 62, 256–262.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore, A. & Hiatt, R. B., 1967. Action of epinephine on gastrointestinal motility in the spiny dogfish. Bulletin. Mount Desert Island Biological Laboratory, 7, 32–33.Google Scholar
Müller, E. & Liljestrand, G., 1918. Anatomische u. experimentelle Untersuchungen über das autonomische Nervensystem der Elasmobianchien nebst Bemerkungen ü die Darmnerven bei den Amphibien u. Saugetieren. Archiv fur Anatomie und Physiologie (Abteilung Anatomie), 1918, 137–172.Google Scholar
Nicholls, J. V. V., 1933. The effect of temperature variations and of certain drugs upon the gastric motility of elasmobranch fishes. Contributions to Canadian Biology and Fisheries, 7, 449–663.Google Scholar
Nicholls, J. V. V., 1934. Reaction of the smooth muscle of the gastro-intestinal tract of the skate to stimulation of autonomic nerves in isloated nerve muscle preparations, Journal of Physiology, 83, 56–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Satchell, D., Burnstock, G. & Dann, P., 1973. Antagonism of the effects of purinergic nerve stimulation and exogenously applied ATP on the guinea-pig taenia coli by 2-substituted imidazolines and related compounds. European Journal of Pharmacology, 23, 264–269.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Satchell, D. G., Lynch, A., Bourke, P. M. & Burnstock, G., 1972. Potentiation of the effects of exogenously applied ATP and purinergic nerve stimulation on the guinea pig taenia coli by dipyridamole and hexobendine. European Journal of Pharmacology 19, 343–350.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watson, A. H. D., 1979. Fluorescent histochemistry of the teleost gut: evidence for the presence of serotonergic neurons. Cell and Tissue Research, 197, 155–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, J. Z., 1933. The autonomic nervous system of selachians. Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science, 75, 571–624.Google Scholar