Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:29:39.482Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nephtyidae (Polychaeta) from the Gulf of California (Mexican Pacific) with the description of two new species of Aglaophamus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 September 2008

J. Pérez-Torrijos
Affiliation:
Laboratorio de Ecología y Biodiversidad de Invertebrados Marinos, Instituto de Ciencias del Mar y Limnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Apartado Postal 70-305, México, D.F. 04510, México
P. Hernández-Alcántara
Affiliation:
Laboratorio de Ecología y Biodiversidad de Invertebrados Marinos, Instituto de Ciencias del Mar y Limnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Apartado Postal 70-305, México, D.F. 04510, México
V. Solís-Weiss*
Affiliation:
Laboratorio de Ecología y Biodiversidad de Invertebrados Marinos, Instituto de Ciencias del Mar y Limnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Apartado Postal 70-305, México, D.F. 04510, México
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: V. Solís-Weiss, Laboratorio de Ecología y Biodiversidad de Invertebrados Marinos, Instituto de Ciencias del Mar y Limnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Apartado Postal 70-305, México, D. F. 04510, México email: [email protected]

Abstract

The aim of this study is to analyse the Nephtyidae from the Gulf of California. Previous studies about the family Nephtyidae from the continental shelf of the Gulf include 21 species of which seven have been synonymized by several authors, so that at present only 14 species are recognized. In this study, 1763 specimens of Nephtyidae from the continental shelf of the Gulf of California were examined. Eight species were identified, from which Aglaophamus longicirrata sp. nov. and Aglaophamus foliosa sp. nov. are newly described. Aglaophamus longicirrata sp. nov. is characterized by the presence of very long dorsal cirri in median parapodia and by having 16 rows of subterminal papillae with 3–7 papillae per row, and a pair of middorsal papillae on the proboscis. Aglaophamus foliosa sp. nov. is characterized by foliaceous long dorsal cirri; the proboscis bears 16 rows of subterminal papillae and an irregular number of papillae per row, from 5 to 15. A taxonomic key is presented for the species of Nephtyidae recorded from the continental shelf of the Gulf of California, including the two new species of Aglaophamus.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Audouin, J.V. and Milne-Edwards, H. (1833) Classification des Annélides, et description de celles qui habitent les côtes de la France. Annales des Sciences Naturelles Paris, série 1 29, 195269.Google Scholar
Augener, H. (1922) Australische Polychaeten des Hamburger Zoologischen Museums. Archive für Naturgeschichte 7, 137.Google Scholar
Baird, W. (1873) Description of some new species of Annelida Gephyrea in the collection of the British Museum. Journal of the Linnean Society of London, Zoology 11, 341361.Google Scholar
Claparède, E. (1863) Beobachtungen über Anatomie und Entwicklungsgeschichte wirbelloser Thiere an der Küste von Normandie angestellt. Leipzig: Wilhelm Engelmann, 120 pp.Google Scholar
Coonfield, B.R. (1931) The cilia of Naphthys (sic) bucera. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of Philadelphia 17, 416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coonfield, B.R. (1934) The movement and regulation of cilia on the parapodia of Nephthys bucera, Ehlers. Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory 67, 399409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de León-González, J.A. (1994) Poliquetos (Annelida: Polychaeta) de la plataforma continental de la costa oeste de Baja California Sur, México: taxonomía, hábitos alimenticios y distribución. Tesis Maestría, CICIMAR, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, México, 177 pp.Google Scholar
Ehlers, E. (1868) Die Borstenwürmer, nach systematischen und anatomischen Untersuchungen dargestellt. Leipzig: Wilhelm Englemann, pp. 269748.Google Scholar
Fauchald, K. (1968) Nephtyidae (Polychaeta) from the Bay of Nha Trang, South Vietnam. Naga Report 4, 534.Google Scholar
Fauchald, K. and Jumars, P.A. (1979) The diet of worms: a study of polychaeta feeding guilds. Oceanography and Marine Biology: an Annual Review 17, 193284.Google Scholar
Fauchald, K. and Rouse, G. (1997) Polychaete systematics: past and present. Zoologica Scripta 26, 71138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fauvel, P. (1902) Annélides polychaetes de la Casamance rapportées par M. Aug. Chevalier. Bulletin de la Société Linnéenne de Normandie 5, 59105.Google Scholar
Fauvel, P. (1932) Annelida Polychaeta of the Indian Museum, Calcutta. Memorial Indian Museum, Calcutta 12, 1262.Google Scholar
González-Ortiz, L. (1994) Los poliquetos (Annelida: Polychaeta) de la plataforma continental del Golfo de Tehuantepec, México. Tesis Profesional, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México, 191 pp.Google Scholar
Hartman, O. (1938) Review of the annelid worms of the family Nephtyidae from the northeast Pacific, with descriptions of five new species. Proceedings of the United States National Museum 85, 134158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartman, O. (1940) Polychaetous annelids. Part II. Chrysopetalidae to Goniadidae. Allan Hancock Pacific Expeditions 7, 173287.Google Scholar
Hartman, O. (1950) Goniadidae, Glyceridae and Nephtyidae. Allan Hancock Pacific Expeditions 15, 1181.Google Scholar
Hartman, O. (1968) Atlas of the errantiate polychaetous annelids from California. Los Angeles: Allan Hancock Foundation and University of Southern California Press, 822 pp.Google Scholar
Heimler, W. (1983) Untersuchungen sur Larvalentwicklung von Lanice conchilega (Pallas 1766) (Polychaeta/Terebellomorpha). Part III, Bau und Struktur der Aulophora-Larve. Zoologische Jahrbücher (Anatomie Ontogenie der Tiere) 110, 411478.Google Scholar
Hernández-Alcántara, P. (2002) Composición y estructura de las comunidades de poliquetos (Annelida: Polychaeta) bénticos de la plataforma continental del Golfo de California. Tesis Doctorado. Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México, 196 pp.Google Scholar
Hernández-Alcántara, P. and Solís-Weiss, V. (1999) Systematics and distribution of the polychaetes (Annelida: Polychaeta) from the sublittoral zone in the Gulf of California. Oceánides 13, 2538.Google Scholar
Hilbig, B. (1994) Family Nephtyidae Grube, 1850. In Blake, J.A. and Hilbig, B. (eds) Taxonomic atlas of the benthic fauna of the Santa Maria Basin and western Santa Barbara Channel, Volume 4. Santa Barbara, California: Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History, pp. 329362.Google Scholar
Hoagland, R.A. (1920) Polychaetous annelids collected by the United States Fisheries Steamer ALBATROSS during the Philippine expedition of 1907 to 1909. US National Museum Bulletin 100, 603634.Google Scholar
Jackson, M.L. (1958) Soil chemical analysis. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Publications, 498 pp.Google Scholar
Kinberg, J.G.H. (1866) Annulata nova. Fam. Nephthydea (Grube). Öfversigt af Kungliga Vetenskaps-Akademiens Förhandlingar, Stockholm 22, 239258.Google Scholar
Kudenov, J.D. (1975) Errant polychaetes from the Gulf of California, Mexico. Journal of Natural History 9, 6591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kudenov, J.D. (1980) Annelida: Polychaeta (Bristleworms). In Brusca, R.C. (ed.) Common intertidal invertebrates of the Gulf of California. 2nd edition.Arizona: University of Arizona Press, pp. 77123.Google Scholar
McIntosh, W.C. (1885) Report on the Annelida Polychaeta collected by H.M.S. Challenger during the years 1873–76. Challenger Reports 12, 1554.Google Scholar
Monro, C.C.A. (1928) Papers from Dr. Th. Mortensen's Pacific Expedition 1914–16. XLV. On the Polychaeta collected by Dr. Th. Mortensen off the Coast of Panama. Videnskabelige Meddelelser fra Dansk Naturhistorisk Forening 85, 75103.Google Scholar
Pallas, P.S. (1766) Miscellanea Zoologica, quibus novae imprimis atque obscurae Animalium species describunture et observationibus iconibusque illustrantur. Hagae Comitum, 244 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perkins, T.H. (1980) Review of species previously referred to Ceratonereis mirabilis, and descriptions of new species of Ceratonereis, Nephtys, and Goniada (Polychaeta). Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 93, 149.Google Scholar
Pettibone, M.H. (1982) Annelida. In Parker, S.P. (ed.) Synopsis and classification of living organisms, 2 volumes. New York: McGraw-Hill, pp. 143.Google Scholar
Pleijel, F. (2001) Nephtyidae, Grube, 1850. In Rouse, G.W. and Pleijel, F. (eds) Polychaetes. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 127129.Google Scholar
San Martín, G. (2003) Annelida, Polychaeta II: Syllidae. In Ramos, M.A., Alba, J., Bellés, X., Gosálbez, J., Guerra, A., Mcpherson, E., Martín, F., Serrano, J. and Templado, J. (eds) Fauna Ibérica. Madrid: Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, CSIC, 554 pp.Google Scholar
Schlötzer-Schrehardt, U. (1991) Ultrastructural differentiation of nuchal and dorsal organs during postembryonic and sexual development of Pygospio elegans Claparède (Polychaeta: Spionidae). Ophelia Supplement 5, 633640.Google Scholar
Schmarda, L.K. (1861) Neue wirbellose Thiere beobachtet und gesammelt auf einer Reise um die Erde 1853 bis 1857. Volume 1. Leipzig: Turbellarian, Rotatorien un Anneliden, pp. 1164.Google Scholar
Strickland, J.D.H. and Parsons, T.R. (1977) A practical handbook of seawater analysis. Fisheries Research Board of Canada, Bulletin 167, 1310.Google Scholar
Taylor, J.L. (1984) Family Nephtyidae Grube, 1850. In Uebelacker, J.M. and Johnson, P.G. (eds) Taxonomic guide to the polychaetes of the northern Gulf of Mexico. Volume 5. Final report to the Minerals Management Service, contract 14-12-001-29091. Mobile, Alabama: Barry A. Vittor and Associates, Inc., pp. 35.135.20.Google Scholar
Walkley, A. and Black, I.A. (1934) An examination of the Degthareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science 27, 2938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar