Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:18:44.493Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Macrobenthic Infauna of the Offshore Northern North Sea

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

A. Eleftheriou  and
D.J. Basford
A. Eleftheriou
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Crete, PO Box 1470, Heraklion 71110, Crete, Greece
D.J. Basford
Affiliation:
Marine Laboratory, PO Box 101, Victoria Road, Aberdeen, AB9 8DB
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Between 1980 and 1985 ninety-seven stations were sampled by Smith-Mclntyre grab from the offshore northern section of the North Sea. Four hundred and nine infaunal species were identified from the 76 selected macrofaunal stations. The number of species per station varied from 25 to 80 with a maximum abundance of 9,600 individuals m−2. The biomass ranged from 0.13 to 18.86 g dry weight m−2. At most stations, however, biomass varied between 1 and 4 g dry weight m−2. Diversity and abundance were highest in the 120–140 m zone, characterised by fine sand containing variable amounts of silt. The highest biomasses were recorded in two areas; firstly where stronger currents predominate and the sediments are coarser (east of Shetland and west of the Norwegian Trough), and secondly in the fine sandy deposits of the centrally located area. In the silty sediments (Fladen Ground and smaller depressions) there was a predominantly subsurface deposit-feeding community, whereas in the coarser area east of the Shetlands carnivores predominated. Over the remaining area surface deposit feeders were dominant.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 69 , Issue 1 , February 1989 , pp. 123 - 143
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adams, J.A., 1987. The primary ecological sub-divisions of the North Sea: some aspects of their plankton communities. In Developments in Fisheries Research in Scotland (ed. R.S., Bailey and B.B., Parrish), pp. 165–181. London: Fishing News.Google Scholar
Barnes, R.D., 1974. Invertebrate Zoology, 3rd ed.Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders & Company.Google Scholar
Basford, D.J. & Eleftheriou, A., 1988. The benthic environment of the North Sea (56C-61 °N). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 68, 125–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beedham, G.E., 1972. Identification of the British Mollusca. Amersham, Bucks: Hulton Educational Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
Cranmer, G.J., 1985. Recent investigations into the distribution of regular echinoids in the North Sea. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 65, 351–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cranmer, G.J., Dyer, M.F. & Fry, P.D., 1984. Further results from the headline camera surveys in the North Sea. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 64, 335–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cushman, J.A., 1969. Foraminifera Their Classification and Economic Use, 4th ed.Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dyer, M.F., Fry, W.G., Fry, P.D. & Cranmer, G.J., 1982. A series of North Sea benthos surveys with trawl and headline camera. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 62, 297–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyer, M.F., Fry, W.G., Fry, P.D. & Cranmer, G.J., 1983. Benthic regions within the North Sea. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 63, 683–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enequist, P., 1950. Studies on the soft-bottom amphipods of the Skagerrak. Zoologiska Bidrag Fran Uppsala, 28, 299–484.Google Scholar
Fauchald, K. & Jumars, P.A., 1979. The diet of worms: a study of polychaete feeding guilds. Oceanography and Marine Biology, an Annual Review, 17, 193–284.Google Scholar
Glémarec, M., 1973. The benthic communities of the European North Atlantic continental shelf. Oceanography and Marine Biology, an Annual Review, 11, 263–289.Google Scholar
Hartley, J.P., 1984. The benthic ecology of the Forties oilfield (North Sea). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 80, 161–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, M.O., 1979. DECORANA- A FORTRAN Programme for Detrended Correspondence Analysis and Reciprocal Averaging. Ithaca: Cornell University.Google Scholar
Jones, N.S. 1950. Marine bottom communities. Biological Reviews, 25, 283–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, N.S. 1976. British cumaceans. Synopses of the British Fauna, no. 7, 62 pp.Google Scholar
Jørgensen, C.B., 1966. Biology of Suspension Feeding. London: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Kingston, P.F. & Rachor, E., 1982. North Sea bottom communities. International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (CM. Papers and Reports), L: 41, 16 pp.Google Scholar
Kirkegaard, J.B., 1969. A quantitative investigation of the central North Sea Polychaeta. Spolia. Zoologica Musei Hauniensis, 29, 285 pp.Google Scholar
Lee, A.J., 1980. North Sea: physical oceanography. In The North-West European Shelf Seas: The Sea Bed and the Sea in Motion. II. Physical and Chemical Oceanography and Physical Resources, (ed. F.T., Banner, M.B., Collins and K.S., Massie), pp. 467–493. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Lee, A.J. & Ramster, J.W. (compilers), 1981. Atlas of the Seas Around the British Isles. London: MAFF.Google Scholar
Mclntyre, A.D., 1961. Quantitative differences in the fauna of boreal mud associations. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 41, 599–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mclntyre, A.D. & Eleftheriou, A., 1968. The bottom fauna of a flatfish nursery ground. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 48, 113–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millar, R.H., 1970. British ascidians. Synopses of the British Fauna, no. 1, 88 pp.Google Scholar
Mortensen, T., 1977. Handbook of the Echinoderms of the British Isles. Uitgever, Rotterdam: Dr. W. Backhuys.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, T.H., 1971. Studies on the ecology of the macrobenthic fauna of Lochs Linnhe and Eil, west coast of Scotland. II. Analysis of the macrobenthic fauna by comparison of feeding group. Vie et Milieu, supplement 22, 53–91.Google Scholar
Petersen, G.H., 1977. The density, biomass and origin of the bivalves of the central North Sea. Meddelelser fra Danmarks Fiskeri- og Havundersagelser, 7, 221–273.Google Scholar
Rhoads, D.C. & Young, D.K., 1970. The influence of deposit-feeding organisms on sediment stability and community trophic structure. Journal of Marine Research, 28, 150–178.Google Scholar
Salvini-Plawen, L. Von, 1971. Die nordatlantischen Caudofoveata des zoologischen museums zu Kopenhagen (Mollusca, Aculifera). Steenstrupia, 2, 27–34.Google Scholar
Stephen, A.C., 1923. Preliminary survey of the Scottish waters of the North Sea by the Petersen grab. Scientific Investigations. Fisheries Division, Scottish Home Department, 1922 (3), 21 pp.Google Scholar
Stephen, A.C., 1933. Studies on the Scottish marine fauna: the natural faunistic divisions of the North Sea as shown by the quantitative distribution of the molluscs. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 57, part III, no. 22, 601–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephen, A.C. & Edmonds, S.J., 1972. The Phyla Sipuncula and Echiura. London: British Museum (Natural History).Google Scholar
Thompson, T.E., 1976. Biology of Opisthobranch Molluscs, vol. 1. London: Ray Society.Google Scholar
Ursin, E., 1960. A quantitative investigation of the echinoderm fauna of the central North Sea. Meddelelser fra Danmarks Fiskeri- og Havundersegelser, 2 (24), 204 pp.Google Scholar