Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T04:48:10.503Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The life-histories of the bivalves Montacuta substriata and M. ferruginosa, ‘commensals’ with spatangoids

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

John Gage
John Gage
Affiliation:
University of Southampton
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The life-histories of the erycinaceans Montacuta substriata and M. ferruginosa were investigated with special reference to the initiation of their ‘commensal’ associations. The planktotrophic larvae are released in summer as veligers after incubation within the adults, and they may spend several months in the plankton before settlement and metamorphosis. Larvae of both species, isolated from the Plymouth plankton, were reared to post-larval stages that were comparable with spat found associated with spatangoids. Some corrections are made of the identifications of planktonic larvae, of these and other Erycinacea, by previous authors. Experiments showed that, apart from being more active, the responses of walking post-larvae are similar to those I have described previously with adults. It is considered that the reactions operate, in an integrated manner similar to the adults, in initiating their associations with spatangoids; the behaviour of the adults in maintaining and re-establishing their associations would thus represent a retention of larval faculties. Possible reasons for the restriction of M. substriata to superficial burrowers and the less specific occurrences of small M. ferruginosa amongst spatangoids—including both deep and shallow-burrowing species—are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 46 , Issue 3 , October 1966 , pp. 499 - 511
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alder, J. 1850. Notes on Montacuta ferruginosa. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist., Ser. 2, Vol. 5, pp. 210–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carriker, M. R. 1961. Interrelation of functional morphology, behaviour, and autecology in early stages of the bivalve Mercenaria mercenaria. J. Elisha Mitchell scient. Soc., Vol. 77, pp. 168–242.Google Scholar
Davenport, D. 1955. Specificity and behaviour in symbioses. Q. Rev. Biol., Vol. 30, pp. 29–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gage, J. 1966a. Observations on the bivalves Montacuta substriata and M. ferruginosa, ‘commensals’ with spatangoids. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 46, pp. 49–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gage, J. 1966b. Experiments with the behaviour of Montacuta substriata and M. ferruginosa, ‘commensals’ with spatangoids. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 46, pp. 71–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gooding, R. U. 1957. On some Copepoda from Plymouth, mainly associated with invertebrates, including three new species. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 36, pp. 195–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jørgensen, C. B. 1946. Reproduction and larval development of Danish marine bottom invertebrates. 9. Lamellibranchia. Meddr Kommn Danm. Fisk.- og Havunders., Ser. Plankton, Vol. 4, pp. 277–311.Google Scholar
Lebour, M. V. 1938a. The life history of Kellia suborbicularis. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 22, pp. 447–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebour, M. V. 1938b. Notes on the breeding of some lamellibranchs from Plymouth and their larvae. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 23, pp. 119–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovén, S. 1850. Bidrag till kännedomen om utvecklingen af Mollusca Acephala Lamellibranchiata. K. svenska VetenskAkad. Handl., 1848, Pt. 2, pp. 329–435.Google Scholar
Ockelmann, K. W. 1965. Redescription, distribution, biology, and dimorphous sperm of Montacuta tenella Lovén (Mollusca, Leptonacea). Ophelia, Vol. 2, pp. 211–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oldfield, E. 1964. The reproduction and development of some members of the Erycinidae and Montacutidae (Mollusca, Eulamellibranchiata). Proc. malac. Soc. Lond., Vol. 36, pp. 79–120.Google Scholar
Popham, M. L. 1940. The mantle cavity of some of the Erycinidae, Montacutidae and Galeommatidae with special reference to the ciliary mechanisms. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 24, pp. 549–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rees, C. B. 1950. The identification and classification of lamellibranch larvae. Hull Bull. mar. Ecol., Vol. 3, pp. 73–104.Google Scholar
Rees, C. B. 1951. Continuous plankton records: first report on the distribution of lamellibranch larvae in the North Sea. Hull Bull. mar. Ecol. Vol. 3, pp. 105––34.Google Scholar
Rees, C. B. 1954. Continuous plankton records: the distribution of lamellibranch larvae in the North Sea, 1950–1951. Bull. mar. Ecol., Vol. 4, pp. 21–46.Google Scholar
Ursin, E. 1960. A quantitative investigation of the echinoderm fauna of the central North Sea. Meddr Danm. Fisk.- og Havunders., N.S., Vol. 11, No. 24, 204 pp.Google Scholar
Zachvatkina, K. A. 1959. Larvae of bivalve molluscs of the Black Sea in the Sevastopol region. Trudy Sevastopol'. biol. Sta., Vol. 77, pp. 108–52 (in Russian).Google Scholar