Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:11:19.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Life History Patterns of Polychaete Species of the Family Spionidae

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

H. Gudmundsson
H. Gudmundsson
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, The University, Newcastle upon Tyne NEi 7RU
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The reproductive morphology and larval development in Spionidae has been dealt with extensively by Soderström (1920), Hannerz (1956), Orrhage (1964). Simon (1967), Blake (1969) and Rice (1980). The family shows a considerable variation in gamete morphology, modes of sperm transfer and types of larval development. One might also expect variability in features of the life history patterns, such as the life span, reproductive age, reproductive cycles and fecundity, both between and within species.

Previous population studies on spionids include the work on populations of Polydora ciliata (Johnston) (Dorsett, 1961); (Daro & Polk, 1973), on populations of Scolelepis squamata (Müller) (Joyner, 1962); (Richards, 1970), on a population of Scolecolepides viridis (Verrill) (George, 1966) and on a laboratory reared population of Malacoceros cf. fuliginosus (Guérin, 1973). The present paper is an attempt to analyse the patterns of life history as they appear in littoral populations of Spio martinensis Mesnil, Polydora ciliata (Johnston), Pygospio elegans Claparede and Malacoceros fuliginosus (Claparède) at localities in N. E. England. The main features considered here are the changes in the size (age) distributions, the annual cycles of reproduction, the output of offspring and population density changes.

The Spio species in the population at Black Middens, North Shields, which is referred to S. martinensis Mesnil (1896) in this paper, was previously referred to S. filicornis (Müller, 1776) by Brady (1943). This species is identical to Mesnil's species, both in morphology and with regard to known biological features, while S. filicornis differs from it morphologically and its distribution pattern (Hannerz, 1956; Rasmussen, 1973; Wolff, 1973, Gudmundsson, in preparation).

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 65 , Issue 1 , February 1985 , pp. 93 - 111
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blake, J. A., 1969. Reproduction and larval development of Polydora from northern New-England (Polychaeta: Spionidae). Ophelia, 7, 1–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, J. A. & Woodwick, K. H., 1975. Reproduction and larval development of Pseudopolydora paucibranchiata (Okuda) and Pseudopolydora kempi (Southern) (Polychaeta: Spionidae). Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Mass., 149, 109–127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brady, F., 1943. The distribution of the fauna of some intertidal sands and muds on the Northumberland coast. Journal of Animal Ecology, 12, 27–41.Google Scholar
Clark, R. B., 1977. Reproduction, speciation and polychaete taxonomy. In Essays on Polychaetous Annelids, in Memory of Dr Olga Hartman (ed. Reish, D. J. and Fauchald, K.), pp. 477–501. Los Angeles: Allan Hancock Foundation, University of Southern California.Google Scholar
Daro, M. H. & Polk, P., 1973. The autoecology of Polydora ciliata along the Belgian coast. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research, 6, 130–140.Google Scholar
Day, J. H., 1934. Development of Scolelepis fuliginosa (Claparède). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 19, 633–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorsett, D. A., 1961. The reproduction and maintenance of Polydora ciliata (Johnst.) at Whitstable. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 41, 383–396.Google Scholar
George, J. D., 1966. Reproduction and early development of the spionid Scolecolepides viridis (Verrill). Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Mass., 130, 76–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giard, A., 1905. La poecilogonie. Bulletin scientifique de la France et de la Belgique, 39, 153–187.Google Scholar
Grassle, J. F. & Grassle, J. P., 1974. Opportunistic life histories and genetic systems in marine benthic polychaetes. Journal of Marine Research, 32, 253–284.Google Scholar
Guerin, J. P., 1972. Rapports taxonomiques et developpement larvaire de Spio decoratus Bobretzky 1871 (Annélide, Polychete). Cahiers de biologie marine, 13, 321–339.Google Scholar
Guerin, J. P., 1973. Premières donnes sur la longévité, le rythme de ponte et la fécondité de Scolelepis cf. fuliginosa (Polychète, Spionidé) en élevage. Marine Biology, 19, 27–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guerin, J.-P., 1975. Redescription des adultes et comparaison des divers stades ontogéniques des populations méditerranéennes et atlantiques de Scolelepis fuliginosa (Claparède) (Annélide, Polychète). Cahiers de biologie marine, 16, 21–37.Google Scholar
Hannerz, I., 1956. Larval development of the polychaete families Spionidae Sars, Disomidae Mesnil and Poecilochaetidae n. fam. in the Gullmar Fjord, Sweden. Zoologiska bidrag från Uppsala, 31, 1–203.Google Scholar
Hempel, C., 1957. Zur Ökologie einiger Spioniden der Deutschen Küsten. Kieler Meeresforschungen, 13, 275–288.Google Scholar
Hobson, K. D. & Green, R. H., 1968. Asexual and sexual reproduction of Pygospio elegans (Polychaeta) in Barnstable Harbor, Massachusetts. Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Mass., 135, 410.Google Scholar
Joyner, A., 1962. Reproduction and larval life of Nerine cirratulus (Delle Chiaje), family Spionidae. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 138, 655–666.Google Scholar
Mesnil, F., 1896. Etudes de morphologie externe chez les Annélides. I. Spionidiens des côtes de la Manche. Bulletin scientifique de la France et de la Belgique, 29, 110–287.Google Scholar
Mesnil, F., 1916. Sur la ponte d'une Annelide Polychète Spio martinensis Mesn. 1896. Bulletin de la Société zoologique de France, 41, 32–35.Google Scholar
Mesnil, F. & Caullery, M., 1917. Un noveau type de dimorphism evolutif chez und Annélide Polychète (Spio martinensis Mesn.). Compte rendu hebdomadaire des séances de l'Académie des sciences, 165, 646–648.Google Scholar
Muller, O. F., 1776. Zoologiae Danicae Prodromus, seu Animalium Daniae et Norvegiae Indigenarum Characteres, Nomina, et Synonyma Imprimis popularium. 124 pp. Havniae.Google Scholar
Olive, P. J. W. & Clark, R. B., 1978. Physiology of reproduction. In Physiology of Annelids (ed. Mill, P. J.), pp. 271–376. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Orrhage, I., 1964. Anatomische und Morphologische Studien über die Polychaeten Familien Spionidae, Disomidae und Poecilochaetidae. Zoologiska bidrag från Uppsala, 36, 335–405.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, E., 1953. Asexual reproduction in Pygospio elegans Claparède (Polychaeta: Sedentaria). Nature, London, 171, 1161–1162.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, E., 1973. Systematics and ecology of the Isefjord marine fauna (Denmark). Ophelia, 11, 495 pp.Google Scholar
Rice, S. A., 1980. Ultrastructure of the male nephridium and its role in spermatophore formation in spionid polychaetes (Annelida). Zoomorphologie, 95, 181–194.Google Scholar
Rice, S. A. & Simon, J. L., 1980. Intraspecific variation in the pollution indicator polychaete Polydora ligni (Spionidae). Ophelia, 19, 79–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, S. L., 1970. Spawning and reproductive morphology of Scolelepis squamata (Spionidae:Polychaeta). Canadian Journal of Zoology, 48, 1369–1379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schram, T. A., 1970. Studies of the meroplankton in the inner Oslofjord. II. Regional difference and seasonal changes in the specific distribution of the larvae. Nytt magasin for Zoologi, 18, 21 pp.Google Scholar
Simon, J. L., 1967. Reproduction and larval development of Spio setosa. Bulletin of Marine Science, 17, 398–431.Google Scholar
Simon, J. L., 1968. Occurrence of pelagic larvae in Spio setosa. Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Mass., 134, 503–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smidt, E. L. B., 1951. Animal production in the Danish Waddensea. Meddelelser fra Kommissionen for Danmarks Fiskeri- og Havundersøgelser (ser. Fiskeri), 6, 151 pp.Google Scholar
Söderström, A., 1920. Studien über die Polychaetenfamilie Spionidae. Inauguare Dissertation Uppsala.Google Scholar
Thorson, G., 1946. Reproduction and larval development of Danish marine bottom invertebrates, with special reference to the planktonic larvae in the Sound (Øresund). Meddelelser fra Kommissionen for Danmarks Fiskeri- og Havundersøgelser (ser. Plankton), 4, 523 pp.Google Scholar
Wolff, W. J., 1973. The estuary as a habitat. An analysis of data on the soft-bottom macrofauna of the estuarine area of the rivers Rhine, Meuse, and Scheldt. Zoologische verhandelingen, no. 126, 242 pp.Google Scholar