Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T19:12:46.024Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Life History of the Cirratulid Worm, Cirriformia Tentaculata, on an Intertidal Mudflat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

J. D. George
J. D. George*
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Southampton
*
*Present address: Institute of Oceanography, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The seasonal fluctuation in numbers of C. tentaculata was investigated from December 1959 until February 1962. The lowest numbers were recorded in April followed by a rapid increase in numbers during May. The magnitude of the increase varied from year to year, as also did the number of peaks that occurred during the summer months.

The worm was shown to have an extended breeding season from the end of March to September during which several spawning ‘bursts’ took place. Experiments suggest that some spawning may occur when the mudflat is inundated by the rising tide, although spawning was not observed in the field.

The population of C. tentaculata exhibited an annual cycle of growth which was influenced by the seasonal variation in temperature. Laboratory observations suggest that a temperature of about 20° C is optimal for the growth of young worms. The growth rate (8 mm/year) is slow compared with that of other polychaetes.

It is tentatively concluded from the field mortality data that between 10 and 16 % of animals survive to an age at which they are sexually mature; between 6 and 8 % of each generation reach an age of 15 months. Causes of mortality in the population are briefly discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 44 , Issue 1 , February 1964 , pp. 47 - 65
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allen, E. J. & Todd, R. A., 1900. The fauna of the Salcombe estuary. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 6, pp. 151–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkins, W. R. G., 1922. The preparation of permanently non-acid formalin for preserving calcareous specimens. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol.12, pp. 792–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, J. T. & Ramage, G. A., 1888. The Polychaeta Sedentaria of the Firth of Forth. Trans, roy. Soc. Edinb., Vol. 33, pp. 635–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dales, R. P., 1951a. Notes on the reproduction and early development of the cirratulid Tharyx marioni (St Joseph). J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 30, pp. 113–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dales, R. P., 1951 b. An annual history of a population of Nereis diversicolor O. F. Müller. Biol. Bull., Woods Hole, Vol. 101, pp. 131–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorsett, D. A., 1961. The reproduction and maintenance of Polydora ciliata (Johnst.). J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 41, pp. 383–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elwes, E. V., 1910. Notes on the littoral Polychaeta of Torquay. III. J. mar. biol.Ass. U.K., Vol. 9, pp. 59–81.Google Scholar
Forster, G. R. 1959. The biology of the prawn, Palaemon (=Leander) serratus (Pennant). J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 38, pp. 621–7.Google Scholar
Fretter, V., 1951. Turbonilla elegantissima (Montagu) a parasitic opisthobranch. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 30, pp. 37–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, J. D., 1963. Behavioural differences between the larval stages of Cirriformia tentaculata (Montagu) from Drake's Island (Plymouth Sound) and from Southampton Water. Nature, Lond., Vol. 199, p. 195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodrich, E. S., 1945. The study of nephridia and genital ducts since 1895. Quart. J. micro. Sci., Vol. 86, pp. 113–392.Google Scholar
Gunter, G., 1957. Temperature: in ‘Treatise on Marine Ecology and Paleoecology’, Vol. 1. Mem. geol. Soc. Amer., No. 67, pp. 159–84.Google Scholar
Harding, J. P., 1949. The use of probability paper for the graphical analysis of polymodal frequency distributions. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 28, pp. 141–53.Google Scholar
Holme, W. A., 1949. The fauna of sand and mud banks near the mouth of the Exe estuary.J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 28, pp. 189–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klawe, W. L. & Dickie, L. M., 1957. Biology of the bloodworm, Glycera dibranchiata (Ehlers), and its relation to the bloodworm fishery of the Maritime Provinces. Bull. Fish. Res. Bd Can., No. 115, 37 pp.Google Scholar
Mare, M. F, 1942. A study of a marine benthic community with special reference to the micro-organisms. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 25, pp. 517–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIntosh, W. C., 1915. A Monograph of the British Marine Annelids, Vol. III. 368 pp. London: Ray Society.Google Scholar
Moore, H. B., 1937. A comparison of the biology of Echinus esculentus in different habitats. Part III. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol.21, pp. 711–20.Google Scholar
Moore, H. B., 1938. The biology of Purpura lapillus. II. Growth. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 23, pp. 57–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, H. B., 1958. Marine Ecology. 493 pp. New York: Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Newell, G. E., 1948. A contribution to our knowledge of the life history of Arenicola marina L. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 27, pp. 554–80.Google Scholar
Odum, E. P., 1959. Fundamentals of Ecology, 2nd. ed., 546 pp. Philadelphia and London: W. B. Saunders.Google Scholar
Perkins, E. J., 1958. The food relationships of the microbenthos with particular reference to that found at Whitstable, Kent. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist., Ser. 13, Vol. 1, pp. 64–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raymont, J. E. G., 1955. The fauna of an inter-tidal mudflat. Papers in marine Biology and Oceanography, Deep-Sea Res., Vol. 3, Suppl., pp. 178–203.Google Scholar
Sanders, H. L., 1956. The biology of marine bottom communities. Bull. Bingham oceanogr. Coll., Vol. 15, pp. 345–414.Google Scholar
Smidt, E. L. B., 1951. Animal production in the Danish Waddensea. Medd. Komm. Havunderseg, Kbh., Ser. Fiskeri, Bd. 11, 151 pp.Google Scholar
Southern, R., 1914. Clare Island Survey. Archiannelida and Polychaeta. Proc. R. Irish Acad., Vol. 31, Part 47, 160 pp.Google Scholar
Spooner, G. M. & Moore, H. B., 1940. The ecology of the Tamar Estuary. VI. An account of the macrofauna of the intertidal muds. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 24, pp. 283–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephenson, W., 1950. The development of Cirratulus cirratus (O. F. Miiller). Rep. Dove mar. Lab., Ser. 3, Vol. 11, pp. 21–30.Google Scholar
Thamdrup, H. M., 1935. Beiträge zur Ökologie der Wattenfauna auf experimenteller Grundlage. Medd. Komm. Havundersøg., Kbh., Ser. Fiskeri, Bd. 10, 125 pp.Google Scholar
Wieser, W., 1960. Benthic studies in Buzzards Bay. II. The meiofauna. Limnol. Oceanogr., Vol. 5, pp. 121–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, D. P., 1936. The development of Audouinia tentaculata (Montagu). J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 20, pp. 567–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar