Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-03T15:15:20.602Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Improved Methods of Sampling Post-Larval Young Fish and Macroplankton

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

A. J. Southward
A. J. Southward
Affiliation:
The Plymouth Laboratory
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In recent years the general adoption of high-speed plankton samplers has given new impetus to studies of the distribution and survival rate of larval and post-larval fishes; instruments ranging in size from the small Hardy Indicator type to enlarged versions of the Gulf III have been widely employed (e.g. Glover, 1953, 1961; Gehringer, 1952, 1962; Ahlstrom, Isaacs, Thrailkill & Kidd, 1958; Bary, de Stefano, Forsyth & van den Kerkhof, 1958; Bridger, 1958; Hempel, 1959, 1964; Miller, 1961; Kinzer, 1962, 1966; Clarke, 1964; Beverton & Tungate, 1967). At Plymouth a version of the Gulf III proved exceptionally useful for rapid surveys of the distribution of macroplankton indicator species in the Western English Channel and approaches in 1958–60 (Southward, 1962).

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 50 , Issue 3 , August 1970 , pp. 689 - 712
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ahlstrom, E. H., Isaacs, J. D., Thrailkill, J. R. & Kidd, L. W., 1958. High speed plankton sampler. Fishery Bull., Fish Wildl. Serv. U.S., Vol. 58, pp. 187–214.Google Scholar
Allen, E. J., 1917. Post-larval teleosteans collected near Plymouth during the summer of 1914. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 11, pp. 207–50.Google Scholar
Aron, W., 1959. Midwater trawling in the North Pacific. Limnol. Oceanogr., Vol. 4, pp. 409–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bary, B. M., De Stefano, J. G., Forsyth, M. & Van Den Kerkhof, J., 1958. A closing high speed plankton catcher for use in vertical and horizontal towing. Pacif. Sci., Vol. 12, pp. 46–59.Google Scholar
Beverton, R. J. H. & Tungate, D. S., 1967. A multipurpose plankton sampler. J. Cons. perm. int. Explor. Mer, Vol. 31, pp. 145–57.Google Scholar
Blackburn, M. & Associates, 1962. Tuna oceanography in the Eastern Tropical Pacific. Spec. scient. Rep. U.S. Fish Wildl. Serv., No. 400.Google Scholar
Blackburn, M., Griffiths, R. C., Holmes, R. W. & Thomas, W. H., 1962. Physical, chemical and biological observations in the eastern tropical Pacific Ocean: three cruises to the Gulf of Tehuantepec 1958–59. Spec. scient. Rep. U.S. Fish Wildl. Serv., No. 420.Google Scholar
Bridger, J. P., 1958. On efficiency tests made with a modified Gulf III high-speed tow-net. J. Cons. perm. int. Explor. Mer, Vol. 23, pp. 357–65.Google Scholar
Cassie, R. M., 1968. Sample design. Monogr. oceanogr. Methodol., No. 2, pp. 105–21.Google Scholar
Clark, M. R., 1969. A new midwater trawl for sampling discrete depth horizons. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 49, pp. 945–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, R. S., 1914. General report on the larval and post-larval teleosteans in Plymouth waters. J. mar. Biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 10, pp. 327–94.Google Scholar
Clark, R. S., 1920. The pelagic young and early bottom stages of teleosteans. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 12, pp. 159–240.Google Scholar
Clarke, W. D., 1964. The jet net, a new high-speed plankton sampler. J. mar. Res., Vol. 22, pp. 284–7.Google Scholar
Clutter, R. I. & Anraku, M., 1968. Avoidance of samplers. Monogr. oceanogr. Methodo., No. 2, pp. 57–76.Google Scholar
Corbin, P. G., 1948–1949. On the seasonal abundance of young fish. IX. The year 1947. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 27, pp. 718–22. X. The year 1948. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 28, pp. 707–12.Google Scholar
Davies, I. E. & Barham, E. G., 1969. The Tucker opening-closing micronekton net and its performance in a study of the deep scattering layer. Mar. Biol., Vol. 2, pp. 127–31.Google Scholar
Ehrenbaum, E. & Strodtmann, S., 1904. Eier und Jugendformen der Ostseefisch. Wiss. Meeresunters., Abt. Kiel & Helgoland, Bd. 6, pp. 57–126.Google Scholar
Gehringer, J. W., 1952. An all metal plankton sampler (Model Gulf III). Spec. scient. Rep. U.S. Fish. Wildl. Serv., No. 88, pp. 7–12.Google Scholar
Gehringer, J. W., 1962. The Gulf III and other modern high-speed plankton samplers. Rapp. P.-V. Ré;un. Cons. perm. int. Explor. Mer, Vol. 14, pp. 242–8.Google Scholar
Glover, R. S., 1953. The Hardy plankton indicator and sampler: A description of the various models in use. Bull. mar. Ecol., Vol. 4, pp. 7–20.Google Scholar
Glover, R. S., 1961. The multidepth plankton indicator. Bull. mar. Ecol. Vol. 5, pp. 151–64.Google Scholar
Harvey, H. W., 1935. Note concerning a measuring plankton net. J. Cons. perm. int. Explor. Mer, Vol. 10, pp. 179–84.Google Scholar
Hagmeier, E., 1968. Observations on synthetic gauzes for plankton nets. Monogr. oceanogr. Methodol., No. 2, pp. 172–3.Google Scholar
Hefford, A. E., 1910. Notes on the Teleostean ova and larvae observed at Plymouth in spring and summer, 1909. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 9, pp. 1–58.Google Scholar
Hempel, G., 1959. Untersuchungen über die Verbreitung der Heringslarven in English Kanal und der südlichen Nordsee im Januar 1959. Helgolander Wiss. Meeresunters., Bd. 7, pp. 72–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hempel, G., 1964. Die Filterleistung der planktonrohre Hai bei verscheidener Schleppgeschwindigkeit. Eine vorläufige Mitteilung. Helgolander wiss. Meeresunters., Bd. 11, pp. 161–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hensen, V., 1895. Methodik der Untersuchungen bei der plankton expedition. Ergebn. atlant. Ozean Plankton exped. Humboldt. Stift., Bd. 1, B., 200 pp.Google Scholar
Heron, A. C., 1968. Plankton gauze. Monogr. oceanogr. Methodol., No. 2, pp. 19–25.Google Scholar
Kemp, S. & Hardy, A. C., 1929. The Discovery investigations objects, equipment and methods. Part II. The ships, their equipment and the methods used in research. ‘Discovery’ Rep., Vol. 1, pp. 151–222.Google Scholar
Kinzer, J., 1962. Ein einfacher Schleifmechanismus für die Planktonrohre ‘Hai’. Kurze Mitt. Inst. Fischbiol. Univ. Hamb., No. 12, pp. 13–17.Google Scholar
Kinzer, J., 1966. An opening and closing mechanism for the high speed plankton sampler Hai. Deep-Sea Res., Vol. 13, pp. 473–4.Google Scholar
Kulikova, E. B., 1954. Comparative efficiency of several types of plankton nets. Trudy Inst. Okeanol, T. 11, pp. 233–7.Google Scholar
Leavitt, B. B., 1935. A quantitative study of the vertical distribution of the larger zooplankton in deep water. Biol. Bull. mar. biol. Lab., Woods Hole, Vol. 68, pp. 115–30.Google Scholar
Marr, J., 1938. On the operation of large plankton nets. ‘Discovery’ Rep., Vol. 18, pp. 105–20.Google Scholar
Miller, D., 1961. A modification of the small Hardy plankton sampler for simultaneous high speed plankton hauls. Bull. mar. Ecol., Vol. 5, pp. 165–72.Google Scholar
Russell, F. S., 1925 a. Depth recording with plankton nets. Nature, Lond., Vol. 115, pp. 603–4.Google Scholar
Russell, F. S., 1925 b. The vertical distribution of marine macroplankton. An observation on diurnal changes. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 13, pp. 769–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, F. S., 1926. The vertical distribution of marine macroplankton. II. The pelagic young of teleostean fishes in the day time in the Plymouth area, with a note on the eggs of certain species. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 14, pp. 101–59.Google Scholar
Russell, F. S., 1927. The vertical distribution of marine macroplankton. V. The distribution of animals caught in the ring-trawl in the daytime in the Plymouth area. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 14, pp. 557–608.Google Scholar
Russell, F. S., 1928. The vertical distribution of marine macroplankton. VIII. Further observations on the diurnal behaviour of the pelagic young of teleostean fishes in the Plymouth area. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 15, pp. 829–50.Google Scholar
Russell, F. S., 1930–1947. On the seasonal abundance of young fish. Parts I to VIII. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 16, pp. 707–22; Vol. 20, pp. 147–79; Vol. 20, pp. 595–604; Vol. 21, pp. 679–86; Vol. 22, pp. 493–500; Vol. 23, pp. 381–6; Vol. 24, pp. 265–70; Vol. 26, pp. 605–8.Google Scholar
Russell, F. S., 1969. On the seasonal abundance of young fish. XI. The year 1966. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 49, pp. 305–10.Google Scholar
Saville, A., 1959. Mesh selection in plankton nets. J. cons. perm. int. Explor. Mer, Vol. 23, pp. 192–201.Google Scholar
Schmidt, J., 1904. Fiskeriundersøgelser ved Island og Farøerne i sommeren 1903. Skr. Danm. Fisk.-og Havunders., No. 1, 148 pp.Google Scholar
Schmidt, J., 1929. Introduction to the Oceanographic reports. Oceanogrl Rep. ‘Dana’ Exped., 1920–22, Vol. 1, pp. 1–87.Google Scholar
Smith, P. E., Counts, R. C. & Clutter, R. I., 1968. Changes in filtering efficiency of plankton nets due to clogging under tow. J. Cons. perm. int. Explor. Mer, Vol. 32, pp. 232–48.Google Scholar
Southward, A. J., 1962. The distribution of some plankton animals in the English Channel and approaches. II. Surveys with the Gulf III high-speed sampler, 1958–60. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 42, pp. 275–375.Google Scholar
Tranter, D. J. & Fraser, J. H., 1968 (ed.). Zooplankton Sampling. Monogr. oceanogr. Methodol., No. 2.Google Scholar
Tranter, D. J. & Smith, P. E., 1968. Filtration performance. Unesco Monogr. Oceanogr. Meth., No. 2, pp. 27–56.Google Scholar
Tucker, G. H., 1951. The relation of fishes and other organisms to the scattering of underwater sound. J. mar. Res., Vol. 10, pp. 215–238.Google Scholar
Vannucci, M., 1968. Loss of organisms through the meshes. Monogr. oceanogr. Methodol., No. 2., pp. 77–85.Google Scholar