Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:42:12.792Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Host-Adoption in the Commensal Polychaete Nereis Fucata

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

J. B. Gilpin-Brown
J. B. Gilpin-Brown
Affiliation:
From the Plymouth Laboratory
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The adults ofNereis fucata (Savigny) are commensal with hermit crabs and live within the upper whorls of the shells of their hosts. The mechanism of host adoption has been examined in juveniles reared in the laboratory. There are two distinct phases in their response to their host. The first is a searching phase during which the anterior two-thirds of the worm is extended from the tube and makes wide sweeping movements in its immediate vicinity. This phase can be initiated in the laboratory solely by vibrations in the substrate; the presence of a hermit crab is not required. The second phase begins as soon as a suitable gastropod shell is touched, when the worm immediately leaves its tube and enters the shell. In the laboratory this phase can be achieved without the presence of a hermit crab, so that it is presumably primarily dependent upon the tactile stimuli received from the surface of the shell. It is argued that in nature only hermit-crab shells would commonly give this combination of stimuli to the worm and that the association betweenNereis fucata and hermit crabs is not accidental but commensal.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 49 , Issue 1 , February 1969 , pp. 121 - 127
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brightwell, L. R., 1951. Some experiments with the common hermit crab(Eupagurus bernhardus Linn.), and transparent univalve shells. Proc. zool. Soc. Land., Vol. 121, pp. 279–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, R. B., 1956. Capitella capitata as a commensal. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist., Vol. 9, pp. 433–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davenport, D., 1955. Specificity and behaviour in symbioses. Q. Rev. Biol., Vol. 30, pp. 29–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davenport, D., 1966. The experimental analysis of behaviour in symbioses. Chapter 8 in Symbiosis, pp. 381–429. Ed. S., Mark Henry. New York and London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gilpin-Brown, J. B., 1959. The reproduction and larval development of Nereis fucata (Savigny). J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 38, pp. 65–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartman, O., 1959. Catalogue of the polychaetous annelids of the world. Part I. Occ. Pap. Allan Hancock Fdn, No. 23, 353 pp.Google Scholar
Hempelmann, H., 1911. Zur Naturgeschichte von Nereis dumerilii Aud. et Edw. Zoologica, Stuttgart, Bd. 25, pp. 1–135.Google Scholar
Hickok, J. F. & Davenport, D., 1957. Further studies in the behaviour of commensal polychaetes. Biol. Bull. Mar. Biol. Lab., Woods Hole, Vol. 113, pp. 397–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marine Biological Association, 1957. Plymouth Marine Fauna (3rd ed.).Google Scholar
Rabaut, E., 1939. Nereis Fucata Sav., Et La Notion De Commensalisme. Bull. biol. Fr. Belg., T. 73, fasc. 3, pp. 293–302.Google Scholar