Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:44:52.630Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fluorescence and the Light/Nutrient Interaction in Monochrysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

M. R. Droop
M. R. Droop
Affiliation:
Scottish Marine Biological Association, Dunstaflnage Marine Research Laboratory, P.O. Box 3, Oban, Scotland PA34 4AD
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The observed diminution in photosynthetic efficiency upon vitamin B12 limitation in Monochrysis indicates that nutrient limitation may profoundly influence the photosynthetic status of a natural population and must therefore be taken into account in productivity studies (Droop et al. 1982). It also suggests that photosynthetic efficiency could be used as a criterion between nutrient and light control of growth in natural populations. However, measurement of photosynthetic efficiency is cumbersome under field conditions and it would be advantageous if some other associated variable more quickly measured, such as, e.g. in vivo chlorophyll a fluorescence, could be used as a reliable indicator.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 65 , Issue 1 , February 1985 , pp. 221 - 237
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Droop, M. R., 1966. Vitamin B12 and marine ecology. III. An experiment with a chemostat. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 46, 659–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Droop, M. R., 1968. Vitamin B12 and marine ecology. IV. The kinetics of uptake, growth and inhibition in Monochrysis lutheri. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 48, 689–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Droop, M. R., 1974. The nutrient status of algal cells in continuous culture. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 54, 825–855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Droop, M. R., Mickelson, M. J., Scott, J. M. & Turner, M. F., 1982. Light and nutrient status of algal cells. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 62, 403–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiefer, D. A., 1973. Chlorophyll a fluorescence in marine centric diatoms. Response of chloroplasts to light and nutrient stress. Marine Biology, 23, 39–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kulandaivelu, G. & Daniell, H., 1980. Dichlorophenyl dimethyl urea (DCMU) induced increase in chlorophyll a fluorescence intensity. An index of photosynthetic oxygen evolution in leaves, chloroplasts and algae. Physiological Plant Pathology, 48, 385–388.Google Scholar
Ley, A. C., 1980. The distribution of absorbed light energy for photosynthesis. In Primary Productivity in the Sea (ed. Falkowski, P. G.), pp. 59–82. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Öquist, G., Hagström, Å., Alm, P., Samuelsson, F. & Richardson, K., 1982. Chlorophyll a fluorescence, an alternative method for estimating primary production. Marine Biology, 68, 71–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papageorgiou, G., 1975. Chlorophyll fluorescence: an intrinsic probe of photosynthesis. In Bioenergetics of Photosynthesis (ed. Govindjee, D.), pp. 320–373. New York and London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Prezelin, B. B., 1981. Light reactions in photosynthesis. Canadian Bulletin of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, no. 210, 1–43.Google Scholar
Rey, F., 1978. Some results on the application of the in vivo chlorophyll fluorescence method to marine primary productivity studies. In Symposium on Fluorescence and Luminescence, pp. 36–47. Sweden: University of Umea.Google Scholar
Samuelsson, G. & Öquist, G., 1977. A method for studying photosynthetic capacities of unicellular algae based on in vivo chlorophyll fluorescence. Physiologia plantarum, 40, 315–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuelsson, G., Öquist, G. & Halldal, P., 1978. The variable chlorophyll a fluorescence as a measure of photosynthetic capacity in algae. Verhandlungen der Internationalen Vereinigung fur theoretische und angewandte Limnologie, 21, 207–215.Google Scholar
Swift, D. G., 1980. Vitamins and phytoplankton growth. In The Physiological Ecology of Phytoplankton (ed. Morris, I.), pp. 329–368. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Talling, J. F., 1965. The photosynthetic activity of phytoplankton in East African Lakes. Internationale Revue der gesamten Hydrobiologie, 50, 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar