Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-b4m5d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-22T17:09:12.792Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fiddler Crabs Use the Visual Horizon to Distinguish Predators from Conspecifics: A Review of the Evidence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

John Layne ,
Michael Land  and
Jochen Zeil
John Layne
Affiliation:
Duke University Marine Station, Beaufort, NC 28516, USA.
Michael Land
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton, BN1 9QG.
Jochen Zeil
Affiliation:
Research School of Biological Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Male fiddler crabs, Uca pugilator (Crustacea: Decapoda), respond to conspecifics by claw waving, and to predators by freezing or escape. In field experiments it was found that this distinction was not made on the basis of angular size and speed, nor was shape important. The remaining possibilities were either the absolute size of the stimulus, determined from angular size and distance, or the position of the stimulus relative to the horizon. To distinguish between these, a crab was placed in a glass dish, and moved black stimuli on a white background, at a distance of 22 cm. Stimuli below the crab's horizon hardly ever evoked escape. However, identical stimuli partially or wholly above the crab's horizon produced escape responses whose frequency varied with the angular size of the stimulus. Halving the distance of the stimulus showed that it was angular and not absolute size that determines escape frequency; and experiments with a tilted horizon showed that it is the position of the stimulus relative to the eye equator that is important, rather than the geographical horizon itself. It has been concluded that crabs categorize stimuli as dangerous or otherwise by their position relative to the crabs’ visual horizon.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 77 , Issue 1 , February 1997 , pp. 43 - 54
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Hagen, H.-O. von, 1962. Freilandstudien zur Sexual- und Forrpflanzungsbiologie von Uca tangeri in Andalusien. Zeitschrift für Morphologie und Ökologie der Tiere, 51, 611–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horridge, G.A., 1978. The separation of visual axes in apposition compound eyes. Philosophical Transtransactions of the Royal Society of London B, 285, 1–59.Google ScholarPubMed
Hughes, A., 1977. The topography of vision in mammals of contrasting life-style: comparative optics and retinal organization. In Handbook of sensory physiology. Vol. VII/5. The visual system of vertebrates (ed. F., Crescitelli), pp. 613–756. Berlin: Springer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Land, M.F. & Layne, J., 1995a. The visual control of behaviour in fiddler crabs. I. Resolution, thresholds and the role of the horizon. Journal of Comparative Physiology, 177 A, 81–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Land, M.F. & Layne, J., 1995b. The visual control of behaviour in fiddler crabs. II. Tracking control systems in courtship and defence. Journal of Comparative Physiology, 177 A, 91–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nalbach, H.-O., 1990. Visually elicited escape in crabs. In Frontiers in crustacean neurobiology (ed. K., Wiese et al.), pp. 165–172. Basel: Birkhäuser Verlag. [Advances in Life Sciences.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nalbach, H.-O., Zeil, J. & Forzin, L., 1989. Multisensory control of eye-stalk orientation in space: crabs from different habitats rely on different senses. Journal of Comparative Physiology, 165 A, 643–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stavenga, D., 1979. Pseudopupils of compound eyes. In Handbook of sensory physiology. Vol. VII/6A. Vision in invertebrates (ed. H., Autrum), pp. 357–139. Berlin: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
Zeil, J. & Al-Mutairi, M.M., 1996. The variation of resolution and of ommatidial dimensions in the compound eyes of the fiddler crab Uca lactea annulipes (Ocypodidae, Brachyura, Decapoda). Journal of Experimental Biology, 199, 1569–1577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeil, J., Nalbach, G. & Nalbach, H.-O., 1986. Eyes, eye stalks and the visual world of semi-terrestrial crabs. Journal of Comparative Physiology, 159 A, 801–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeil, J., Nalbach, G. & Nalbach, H.-O., 1989. Spatial vision in a flat world: optical and neural adaptions of arthropods. In Neurobiology of sensory systems (ed. R.N., Singh and N.J., Strausfeld), pp. 123–137. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar