Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T09:07:35.179Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The ecology of the Tamar Estuary VI. An account of the macrofauna of the intertidal muds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

G. M. Spooner
Affiliation:
From the Plymouth Laboratory

Extract

The macrofauna of the intertidal mud-flats of the River Tamar have been investigated. Quantitative samples were taken by sieving the mud through a o·8 mm. sieve. Traverses of series of stations were worked at successive intervals up the river, and the tidal level of each station ascertained.

The characteristic species which inhabit the mud-flats are listed and the data secured regarding (1) population density, (2) up-river penetration, and (3) vertical distribution, are summarized and related to previous information on these points.

While some species are more or less uniformly distributed intertidally, others show marked zonation, with maxima in one part or another of the intertidal zone. Marine species which penetrate into the estuary tend to show the same intertidal distribution as in marine habitats. All five of the more strictly estuarine species are concentrated in the upper tidal levels.

In considering the limiting factors which cause a decrease of population at lower tidal levels, emphasis is placed on the probable importance of the increase in strength of water currents towards low water.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1940

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alexander, W. B., Southgate, B. A. & Bassindale, R., 1932. The salinity of the water retained in the muddy foreshore of an estuary. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc, Vol. XVIII, pp. 297–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, W. B., Southgate, B. A. & Bassindale, R. 1935 Survey of the River Tees. Part II. The Estuary—chemical and biological. D.S.I.R. Water Pollution Research, Tech. Paper No. 5, H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Allen, E. J. & Todd, R. A., 1900. The fauna of the Salcombe Estuary. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc, Vol. VI, pp. 151217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, E. J. & Todd, R. A. 1902. The fauna of the Exe Estuary. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc, Vol. VI, pp. 295335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bassindale, R., 1938. The intertidal fauna of the Mersey Estuary. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc, Vol. XXIII, pp. 8398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colman, J., 1933. The nature of the intertidal zonation of plants and animals. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc, Vol. XVIII, pp. 435–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, G. I., 1936. Additions to the Plymouth Marine Fauna (1931) in the Crustacean orders Tanaidacea, Isopoda, and Amphipoda. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc, Vol. XXI, pp. 95106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, G. I. 1937 The fauna of certain estuaries in west England and south Wales, with special reference to the Tanaidacea, Isopoda, and Amphipoda. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc, Vol. XXI, pp. 647–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, W. G., 1933. Calcium and resistance of Nereis to brackish water. Nature, Vol. CXXXII, p. 748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, J. A., 1932. Observations on the fauna and constituents of an estuarine mud in a polluted area. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc, Vol. XVIII, pp. 6985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartley, P. H. T., 1939. The Saltash tuck-net fishery and the ecology of some estuarine fishes. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc, Vol. XXIV, pp. 168.Google Scholar
Hartley, P. H. T. & Spooner, G. M., 1938. The ecology of the Tamar Estuary. I. Introduction. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc, Vol. XXII, pp. 501–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howes, N. H., 1939. The ecology of a saline lagoon in south-east Essex. Journ. Linn. Soc., Zoology, Vol. XL, pp. 383445.Google Scholar
Lambert, F. J., 1930. Animal life in the marsh ditches of the Thames Estuary. Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 1930, pp. 801–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marine Biological Association, 1931. Plymouth Marine Fauna (2nd edition).Google Scholar
Milne, A., 1938. The ecology of the Tamar estuary. III. Salinity and temperature conditions in the lower estuary. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc, Vol. XXII, pp. 529–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, H. B., 1935. The biology of Balanus balanoides. IV. Relation to environmental factors. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc, Vol. XX, pp. 279307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, H. B., 1937 a The biology of Littorina littorea. Part I. Growth of the shell and tissues, spawning, length of life, and mortality. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc, Vol. XXI, pp. 721–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, H. B., 1937 b. Marine fauna of the Isle of Man. Trans. Liverpool Biol. Soc., Vol. L, pp. 1293.Google Scholar
Moore, H. B., 1939. The biology of Littorina littorea. Part II. Zonation in relation to other Gastropods on stony and muddy shores. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc, Vol. XXIV, pp. 227–37.Google Scholar
Moore, H. B. & Kitching, J. A., 1939. The biology of Chthamalus stellatus (Poli). Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc, Vol. XXIII, pp. 521–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicol, E. A. T., 1935. The ecology of a salt-marsh. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc, Vol. XX, pp. 203–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Percival, E., 1929. A report on the fauna of the estuaries of the River Tamar and the River Lynher. Journ: Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XXI, pp. 721–42.Google Scholar
Purchon, R. D., 1937. Studies on the biology of the Bristol Channel. II. An ecological study of the beach and dock at Portishead. Proc. Bristol Nat. Soc., Vol. III, pp. 311–29.Google Scholar
Reid, D. M., 1930. Salinity interchange between sea-water in sand and overflowing fresh-water at low-tide. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XVI, pp. 609–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothschild, M., 1936. Gigantism and variation in Peringia ulvae Pennant 1777, caused by infection with larval trematodes. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc, Vol. XX, pp. 537–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothschild, M., 1938. Further observations on the effect of trematode parasites on Peringia ulvae (Pennant) 1777. Novitates Zoologicae, Vol. XLI, pp. 84102.Google Scholar
Rothschild, A. & Rothschild, M., 1939. Some observations on the growth of Peringia ulvae (Pennant) 1777 m the laboratory. Novitates Zoologicae, Vol. XLI, pp. 240–7.Google Scholar
Serventy, D. L., 1934. The marine invertebrate fauna. In Scolt Head Island, edited by Steers, J. A., Cambridge, 1934, pp. 196213.Google Scholar
Stephen, A. C., 1929. Studies on the Scottish marine fauna: the fauna of the sandy and muddy areas of the tidal zone. Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh, Vol. LVI, pp. 291306.Google Scholar
Stephen, A. C., 1930. Studies on the Scottish marine fauna: the fauna of the sandy and muddy areas of the tidal zone, additional observations. Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh, Vol. LVI, pp. 521–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephen, A. C., 1931. Notes on the biology of certain lamellibranchs on the Scottish coast. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc, Vol. XVII, pp. 277300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephen, A. C., 1932. Notes on the biology of some lamellibranchs in the Clyde area. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XVII, pp. 5168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thamdrup, H. M., 1935. Beiträge zur Oekologie der Wattenfauna auf experimenteller Grundlage. Medd. Komm. Danmarks Fisk. Havund., Kopenhagen, Bd X, Nr. 2, pp. 1122.Google Scholar
Tutin, T. G., 1936. New species of Zostera from Britain. Journ. Botany, 1936, pp. 227–30.Google Scholar
Wohlenberg, E., 1937. Die Wattenmeer-Lebensgemeinschaften im Königshafen von Sylt. Helgäldnder Wiss. Meeresunt., Bd. 1, h. 1, pp. 192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, F. S., 1936. Report on the Maldon (Essex) Periwinkle fishery. Ministry of Agr. Fish., Fishery Investigations, Ser. 11, Vol. XIV, No. 6, pp. 137.Google Scholar