Hostname: page-component-5f745c7db-8qdnt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-06T09:03:37.532Z Has data issue: true hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The ecology, distribution and taxonomy of the centipedes found on the shore in the Plymouth area

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

J. G. E. Lewis
J. G. E. Lewis
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Bradford Institute of Technology, Bradford, 7, Yorkshire1
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Six species of geophilomorph centipede are reported from the littoral zone in the Plymouth area, and in two cases, where they differ from previous descriptions, the significance of these differences is discussed. It is suggested that the various British and French populations of Geophilus algarum and Geophilus fucorum may be subspecies of one polytypic species.

It is shown that Strigamia maritima and Hydroschendyla submarina differ in the way in which they have adapted to life on the shore. The former lays permeable eggs and migrates out of the littoral zone to lay them and to moult, the latter lays impermeable eggs and moults in the intertidal zone. Information on the prey of S. maritima at Plymouth is given.

The variations between some populations of littoral centipedes is discussed and possible reasons for the high density of populations of S. maritima and H. submarina are given.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 42 , Issue 3 , October 1962 , pp. 655 - 664
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1962

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bagnall, R. S., 1917. On some Lancashire and Cheshire Myriapods new to the British Fauna, with comments on halophilous species. Lancs. Chesh. Nat., Vol. 10, pp. 104–9.Google Scholar
Bagnall, R. S., 1935. Notes on British chilopods (centipedes). I. Ann. mag. Nat. Hist., Ser. 10, Vol. 15, pp. 473–9.Google Scholar
Bassindale, R. & Barrett, J. H., 1957. The Dale Fort marine fauna. Proc. Bristol Nat. Soc., Vol. 29, pp. 227–328.Google Scholar
Blower, J. G., 1955 a. Yorkshire centipedes. Naturalist, Lond., 1955, pp. 137–46.Google Scholar
Blower, J. G., 1955 b. Millipedes and centipedes as soil animals. In Soil Zoology. Kevan, McE, D. K.. (ed.). London.Google Scholar
Blower, J. G., 1957. Feeding habits of a marine centipede. Nature, Lond., Vol. 180, p. 560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blower, J. G., 1961. On some new and little known British centipedes. Ann. mag. Nat. Hist., Ser. 13, Vol. 4, pp. 183–7.Google Scholar
Brölemann, H. W., 1930. Eléments d'une faune des Myriapodes de France: Chilopodes. Faune de France, No. 25.Google Scholar
Cloudsley-Thompson, J. L., 1948. Hydroschendyla submarina (Grube) in Yorkshire with a historical review of the marine Myriapoda. Naturalist, Lond. (1948), pp. 149–52.Google Scholar
Cloudsley-Thompson, J. L., 1951. Supplementary notes on Myriapoda. Naturalist, Lond. (1951), pp. 16–17.Google Scholar
Eason, E. H., 1957. Chilopoda and Diplopoda from Caernarvonshire. Proc. zool. Soc. Lond., Vol. 129, pp. 273–91.Google Scholar
Eason, E. H., 1961. On the synonomy of some British centipedes. Ann. mag. Nat. Hist., Ser. 13, Vol. 4, pp. 385–91.Google Scholar
Jackson, A. R., 1916. On some arthropods observed in 1915. II. Myriapoda. Lanes. Chesh. Nat., Vol. 8, p. 391.Google Scholar
Lewis, J. G. E., 1961 a. The life history and ecology of the littoral centipede Strigamia (= Scolioplanes) maritima (Leach). Proc. zool. Soc. Lond., Vol. 137, pp. 221–48.Google Scholar
Lewis, J. G. E., 1961 b. On Schendyla peyerimhoffi Brölemann and Ribaut and Geophilus pusillifrater Verhoeff, two geophilomorph centipedes new to the British Isles. Ann. mag. Nat. Hist., Ser. 13, Vol. 4, pp. 393–9.Google Scholar
Marine Biological Association, 1957. Plymouth Marine Fauna. 3rd edition. Plymouth.Google Scholar
Morton, J. E., 1954. The crevice fauna of the upper intertidal zone at Wembury. J. mar. Biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 33, pp. 297–312.Google Scholar
Parfitt, E., 1866. Rediscovery of Geophilus maritimus of Leach. Zoologist, Vol. 24, p. 7.Google Scholar
Pocock, R. I., 1899. A marine millipede. Nature, Lond., Vol. 41, pp. 176–7.Google Scholar
Pocock, R. I., 1903. Myriapoda. Victoria Co. Hist., Essex, Vol. 1, pp. 193–4.Google Scholar
T(Hompson), D'A. W., 1889. A marine millipede. Nature, Lond., Vol. 41, p. 104.Google Scholar