Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T16:24:19.668Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dynamic change, recruitment and resilience in reef-forming glass sponges

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Amanda S. Kahn ,
Laura J. Vehring ,
Rachel R. Brown  and
Sally P. Leys
Amanda S. Kahn
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E9, Canada
Laura J. Vehring
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E9, Canada
Rachel R. Brown
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E9, Canada
Sally P. Leys*
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E9, Canada
*
Correspondence should be addressed to:S. P. Leys, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E9, Canada email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Glass sponge reefs on the continental shelf of western Canada and south-east Alaska are considered stable deep-sea habitats that do not change significantly over time. Research cruises using a remotely operated vehicle equipped with accurate GPS positioning have allowed us to observe the same sponges at two reefs in the Strait of Georgia, British Columbia to document recruitment, growth and response to damage over time. Spermatocysts and putative embryos found in winter suggest annual, asynchronous reproduction. Juvenile sponges (2–10 cm in osculum diameter) in densities up to 1 m−2 were more concentrated near live sponges and sponge skeletons than away (Spearman rank correlations, P < 0.0001 for live cover and for skeletons), suggesting that recruitment occurs in particular regions using sponge skeletons as substrate. Most sponges showed no change in shape or size over 2–3 years, but some had died while others showed growth of 1–9 cm year−1. Deposition rates of reef-cementing sediments were 97 mm year−1 at Galiano Reef and 137 mm year−1 at Fraser Reef, but sediments eroded so that there was no net gain or loss over time. Sponges recovered within 1 year from small-scale damage that mimicked bites by fish or nudibranchs; however sponges did not recover from crushing of a large area (1.5 × 2 m2) even 3 years later. These observations and experiments show that while recruitment and growth of sponge reefs is more dynamic than previously thought, the reefs are not resilient in the face of larger-scale disturbances such as might be inflicted by trawling.

Keywords

Hexactinellidaspongesecosystem stabilitydisturbancedeep-searesilience
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 96 , Issue 2: Proceedings of the 9th World Sponge Conference held in Fremantle Australia in 2013: New Frontiers in Sponge Science , March 2016 , pp. 429 - 436
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ardron, J.A. and Jamieson, G.S. (2006) Reducing bycatch of corals and sponges in British Columbia's groundfish trawl fishery through trawl fishery closures. DFO Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat Research Documents 2006/0061, 27 pp.Google Scholar
Austin, W.C., Conway, K.W., Barrie, J.V. and Krautter, M. (2007) Growth and morphology of a reef-forming glass sponge, Aphrocallistes vastus (Hexactinellida), and implications for recovery from widespread trawl damage. In Custódio, M.R., Lôbo-Hajdu, G., Hajdu, E. and Muricy, G. (eds) Porifera Research – Biodiversity, Innovation and Sustainability. Rio de Janeiro: Museu Nacional, pp. 139–145.Google Scholar
Chu, J.W.F. and Leys, S.P. (2010) High resolution mapping of community structure in three glass sponge reefs (Porifera, Hexactinellida). Marine Ecology Progress Series 417, 97–113. doi: 10.3354/meps08794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chu, J.W.F. and Leys, S.P. (2012) The dorid nudibranchs Peltodoris lentiginosa and Archidoris odhneri as predators of glass sponges. Invertebrate Biology 131, 75–81. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7410.2012.00262.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chu, J.W.F., Maldonado, M., Yahel, G. and Leys, S.P. (2011) Glass sponge reefs as a silicon sink. Marine Ecology Progress Series 441, 1–14. doi: 10.3354/meps09381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conway, K.W.W., Barrie, J.V.V., Austin, W.C.C. and Luternauer, J.L. (1991) Holocene sponge bioherms on the western Canadian continental shelf. Continental Shelf Research 11, 771–790. doi: 10.1016/0278-4343(91)90079-L.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conway, K.W., Barrie, J.V. and Krautter, M. (2005) Geomorphology of unique reefs on the western Canadian shelf: sponge reefs mapped by multibeam bathymetry. Geo-Marine Letters 25, 205–213. doi: 10.1007/s00367-004-0204-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, S.E. (2005) Ecology of the hexactinellid sponge reefs on the western Canadian continental shelf. Msc thesis, University of Victoria, Victoria, Canada.Google Scholar
Dayton, P.K., Kim, S., Jarrell, S.C., Oliver, J.S., Hammerstrom, K., Fisher, J.L., O'Connor, K., Barber, J.S., Robilliard, G., Barry, J., Thurber, A.R. and Conlan, K. (2013) Recruitment, growth and mortality of an Antarctic hexactinellid sponge, Anoxycalyx joubini. PLoS ONE 8, e56939. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056939.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ettinger-Epstein, P., Whalan, S., Battershill, C.N. and de Nys, R. (2008) A hierarchy of settlement cues influences larval behaviour in a coral reef sponge. Marine Ecology Progress Series 365, 103–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fallon, S.J., James, K., Norman, R., Kelly, M. and Ellwood, M.J. (2010) A simple radiocarbon dating method for determining the age and growth rate of deep-sea sponges. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B 268, 1241–1243. doi: 10.1016/j.nimb.2009.10.143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fillinger, L., Janussen, D., Lundälv, T. and Richter, C. (2013) Rapid glass sponge expansion after climate-induced antarctic ice shelf collapse. Current Biology 23, 1330–1334. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.05.051.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freese, L., Auster, P.J., Heifetz, J. and Wing, B.L. (1999) Effects of trawling on seafloor habitat and associated invertebrate taxa in the Gulf of Alaska. Marine Ecology Progress Series 182, 119–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, P. and Shaw, G. (1984) Intermediate filaments, microtubules and microfilaments in epidermis of sea urchin tube foot. Cell and Tissue Research 236, 27–33. doi: 10.1007/BF00216509.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heifetz, J., Stone, R.P. and Shotwell, S.K. (2009) Damage and disturbance to coral and sponge habitat of the Aleutian Archipelago. Marine Ecology Progress Series 397, 295–303. doi: 10.3354/meps08304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jamieson, G.S. and Chew, L. (2002) Hexactinellid sponge reefs: areas of interest as marine protected areas in the north and central coast areas. DFO Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat Research Documents 2002/122, 77 pp.Google Scholar
Kahn, A.S., Ruhl, H.A. and Smith, K.L. Jr (2012) Temporal changes in deep-sea sponge populations are correlated to changes in surface climate and food supply. Deep-Sea Research I 70, 36–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, A.S., Yahel, G., Chu, J.W.F., Tunnicliffe, V. and Leys, S.P. (2015) Benthic grazing and carbon sequestration by deep-water glass sponge reefs. Limnology and Oceanography 60, 78–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krautter, M., Conway, K.W. and Barrie, J.V. (2006) Recent hexactinosidan sponge reefs (silicate mounds) off British Columbia, Canada: frame-building processes. Journal of Paleontology 80, 38–48. doi: 10.1666/0022-3360(2006)080[0038:RHSRSM]2.0.CO;2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leys, S.P. and Lauzon, N.R.J. (1998) Hexactinellid sponge ecology: growth rates and seasonality in deep water sponges. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 230, 111–129. doi: 10.1016/S0022-0981(98)00088-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marliave, J.B., Conway, K.W., Gibbs, D.M., Lamb, A. and Gibbs, C. (2009) Biodiversity and rockfish recruitment in sponge gardens and bioherms of southern British Columbia, Canada. Marine Biology 156, 2247–2254. doi: 10.1007/s00227-009-1252-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, R.J., Hocevar, J., Stone, R.P. and Fedorov, D.V. (2012) Structure-forming corals and sponges and their use as fish habitat in Bering Sea submarine canyons. PLoS ONE 7, e33885–e33885. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033885.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Puig, P., Canals, M., Company, J.B., Martín, J., Amblas, D., Lastras, G., Palanques, A. and Calafat, A.M. (2012) Ploughing the deep sea floor. Nature 489, 286–289. doi: 10.1038/nature11410.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Underwood, A.J. (1994) On beyond BACI: sampling designs that might reliably detect environmental disturbances. Ecological Applications 4, 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uriz, M.J., Maldonado, M., Turon, X. and Marti, R. (1998) How do reproductive output, larval behaviour, and recruitment contribute to adult spatial patterns in Mediterranean encrusting sponges? Marine Ecology Progress Series 167, 137–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wassenberg, T.J., Dews, G. and Cook, S.D. (2002) The impact of fish trawls on megabenthos (sponges) on the north-west shelf of Australia. Fisheries Research 58, 141–151. doi: 10.1016/S0165-7836(01)00382-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Kahn supplementary material S1

Kahn supplementary material

Download Kahn supplementary material S1(File)
File 34.9 MB