Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-03T15:26:15.345Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Distribution of Farfantepenaeus aztecus and F. duorarum on submerged aquatic vegetation habitats along a subtropical coastal lagoon (Laguna Madre, Mexico)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

Roberto Pérez-Castañeda ,
Zeferino Blanco-Martínez ,
Jesús Genaro Sánchez-Martínez ,
Jaime L. Rábago-Castro ,
Gabriel Aguirre-Guzmán  and
María de la Luz Vázquez-Sauceda
Roberto Pérez-Castañeda*
Affiliation:
Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas, Carretera Victoria-Mante Km 5, A.P. 263, Cd. Victoria 87000, Tamaulipas, México
Zeferino Blanco-Martínez
Affiliation:
Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas, Carretera Victoria-Mante Km 5, A.P. 263, Cd. Victoria 87000, Tamaulipas, México
Jesús Genaro Sánchez-Martínez
Affiliation:
Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas, Carretera Victoria-Mante Km 5, A.P. 263, Cd. Victoria 87000, Tamaulipas, México
Jaime L. Rábago-Castro
Affiliation:
Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas, Carretera Victoria-Mante Km 5, A.P. 263, Cd. Victoria 87000, Tamaulipas, México
Gabriel Aguirre-Guzmán
Affiliation:
Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas, Carretera Victoria-Mante Km 5, A.P. 263, Cd. Victoria 87000, Tamaulipas, México
María de la Luz Vázquez-Sauceda
Affiliation:
Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas, Carretera Victoria-Mante Km 5, A.P. 263, Cd. Victoria 87000, Tamaulipas, México
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: R. Pérez-Castañeda, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas, Carretera Victoria-Mante Km 5, A.P. 263, Cd. Victoria 87000, Tamaulipas, México email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The spatial distribution of Farfantepenaeus shrimp was analysed in the Laguna Madre of Tamaulipas, Mexico. Sampling was carried out on submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV) habitats at five sites located along the coastal lagoon. Two nocturnal surveys were conducted during winter in 2005 (January–February), collecting a total of 3268 shrimp individuals. SAV beds were composed of a mixture of drift algae (mainly Digenia simplex), attached algae (mainly Penicillus capitatus and Udotea occidentalis) and seagrass (mainly Halodule wrightii). Farfantepenaeus aztecus was more abundant (39.5%) than F. duorarum (36.8%), and the remaining 23.7% corresponding to small unidentified Farfantepenaeus spp. were classified as recruits. Abundance of F. aztecus was significantly higher at sites 2 and 4, whereas F. duorarum did not show significant distribution differences along the Laguna Madre. Recruits, juveniles and total shrimp tended to decrease significantly at the northern part of the lagoon (site 1), where substrate was dominated by drifting algae and seagrasses were scarce or absent. The abundance of shrimp was positively related to seagrass biomass and/or water temperature, whereas there was a negligible or negative relationship with algal biomass. With the exception of subadults, a significant positive linear relationship between seagrass and shrimp abundance was fitted, indicating an increase in number of individuals of both species with increasing seagrass biomass. This suggests that seagrass is the most important component of SAV beds influencing the abundance of F. aztecus and F. duorarum along this hypersaline coastal lagoon.

Keywords

penaeid shrimpseagrassdrift algaeattached algaesubtropical coastal lagoonLaguna MadreMexico
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 90 , Issue 3 , May 2010 , pp. 445 - 452
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barba, E. (1999) Variación de la densidad y la biomasa de peces juveniles y decápodos epibénticos de la región central de la Laguna Madre, Tamaulipas. Hidrobiológica 9, 103–116.Google Scholar
Baxter, K.N. and Renfro, W.C. (1966) Seasonal occurrence and size distribution of postlarval brown and white shrimp near Galveston, Texas, with notes on species identification. Fishery Bulletin 66, 148–158.Google Scholar
Beck, M.W., Heck, K.L. Jr, Able, K.W., Childers, D.L., Eggleston, D.B., Gillanders, B.M., Halpern, B., Hays, C.G., Hoshino, K., Minello, T.J., Orth, R.J., Sheridan, P.F. and Weinstein, M.P. (2001) The identification, conservation, and management of estuaries and marine nurseries for fish and invertebrates. BioScience 51, 633–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boesch, D.F. and Turner, R.E. (1984) Dependence of fishery species on salt marshes: the role of food and refuge. Estuaries 7, 460–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolam, S.G. and Fernandes, T.F. (2002) The effects of macroalgal cover on the spatial distribution of macrobenthic invertebrates: the effect of macroalgal morphology. Hydrobiologia 475/476, 437–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Britton, J.C. and Morton, B. (1989) Shore ecology of the Gulf of Mexico. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Browder, J.A., Zein-Eldin, Z., Criales, M.M., Robblee, M.B., Wong, S., Jackson, T.L. and Johnson, D. (2002) Dynamics of pink shrimp (Farfantepenaeus duorarum) recruitment potential in relation to salinity and temperature in Florida Bay. Estuaries 25, 1355–1371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caley, M.J., Carr, M.H., Hixon, M.A., Hughes, T.P., Jones, G.P. and Menge, B.A. (1996) Recruitment and the local dynamics of open marine populations. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 27, 477–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casares, F.A. and Creed, J.C. (2008) Do small seagrasses enhance density, richness, and diversity of macrofauna? Journal of Coastal Research 24, 790–797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, R.D., Christensen, J.D., Monaco, M.E., Caldwell, P.A., Matthews, G.A. and Minello, T.J. (2004) A habitat-use model to determine essential fish habitat for juvenile brown shrimp (Farfantepenaeus aztecus) in Galveston Bay, Texas. Fishery Bulletin 102, 264–277.Google Scholar
Corona, A., Soto, L.A. and Sánchez, A.J. (2000) Epibenthic amphipod abundance and predation efficiency of the pink shrimp Farfantepenaeus duorarum (Burkenroad, 1939) in habitats with different physical complexity in a tropical estuarine system. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 253, 33–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Criales, M.M., Wang, J.D., Browder, J.A., Robblee, M.B., Jackson, T.L. and Hittle, C. (2006) Variability in supply and cross-shelf transport of pink shrimp (Farfantepenaeus duorarum) postlarvae into western Florida Bay. Fishery Bulletin 104, 60–74.Google Scholar
Dall, W., Hill, B.J., Rothlisberg, P.C. and Sharples, D.J. (1990) The biology of the Penaeidae. In Blaxter, J.H.S. and Southward, A.J. (eds) Advances in marine biology. Volume 27. London: Academic Press, pp. 1–489.Google Scholar
Garcia, S. and Le Reste, L. (1981) Life cycles, dynamics, exploitation and management of coastal penaeid shrimp stocks. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper 203. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
Hannan, J.C. and Williams, R.J. (1998) Recruitment of juvenile marine fishes to seagrass habitat in a temperate Australian estuary. Estuaries 21, 29–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hauxwell, J., Cebrian, J., Furlong, C. and Valiela, I. (2001) Macroalgal canopies contribute to eelgrass (Zostera marina) decline in temperate estuarine ecosystems. Ecology 82, 1007–1022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haywood, M.D.E., Vance, D.J. and Loneragan, N.R. (1995) Seagrass and algal beds as nursery habitats for tiger prawns (Penaeus semisulcatus and P. esculentus) in a tropical Australian estuary. Marine Biology 122, 213–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howe, J.C., Wallace, R.K. and Rikard, F.S. (1999) Habitat utilization by postlarval and juvenile penaeid shrimp in Mobile Bay, Alabama. Estuaries 22, 971–979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, E.L., Rowden, A.A., Attrill, M.J., Bossey, S.J. and Jones, M.B. (2001) The importance of seagrass beds as a habitat for fishery species. Oceanography and Marine Biology: an Annual Review 39, 269–303.Google Scholar
Kenyon, R.A., Loneragan, N.R. and Hughes, J.M. (1995) Habitat type and light affect sheltering behaviour of juvenile tiger prawns (Penaeus esculentus Haswell) and success rates of their fish predators. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 192, 87–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Little, C. (2006) The biology of soft shores and estuaries. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Liu, H. and Loneragan, N.R. (1997) Size and time of day affect the response of postlarvae and early grooved tiger prawns Penaeus semisulcatus De Haan (Decapoda: Penaeidae) to natural and artificial seagrass in the laboratory. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 211, 263–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loneragan, N.R., Kenyon, R.A., Staples, D.J., Poiner, I.R. and Conacher, C.A. (1998) The influence of seagrass type on the distribution and abundance of postlarval and juvenile tiger prawns (Penaeus esculentus and P. semisulcatus) in the western Gulf of Carpentaria, Australia. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 228, 175–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loneragan, N.R., Haywood, M.D.E., Heales, D.S., Kenyon, R.A., Pendrey, R.P. and Vance, D.J. (2001) Estimating the influence of prawn stocking density and seagrass type on the growth of juvenile tiger prawns (Penaeus semisulcatus): results from field experiments in small enclosures. Marine Biology 139, 343–354.Google Scholar
Lüchmann, K.H., Freire, A.S., Ferreira, N.C., Daura-Jorge, F.G. and Marques, M.R.F. (2008) Spatial and temporal variations in abundance and biomass of penaeid shrimps in the subtropical Conceição, southern Brazil. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 88, 293–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, G.A. (2008) Variability in estimating abundance of postlarval brown shrimp, Farfantepenaeus aztecus (Ives), migrating into Galveston Bay, Texas. Gulf and Caribbean Research 20, 29–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minello, T.J. (1993) Chronographic tethering: a technique for measuring prey survival time and testing predation pressure in aquatic habitats. Marine Ecology Progress Series 101, 99–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphey, P.L. and Fonseca, M.S. (1995) Role of high and low energy seagrass beds as nursery areas for Penaeus duorarum in North Carolina. Marine Ecology Progress Series 121, 91–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Castañeda, R. and Defeo, O. (2001) Population variability of four sympatric penaeid shrimps (Farfantepenaeus spp.) in a tropical coastal lagoon of Mexico. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 52, 631–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Castañeda, R. and Defeo, O. (2004) Spatial distribution and structure along ecological gradients: penaeid shrimps in a tropical estuarine habitat of Mexico. Marine Ecology Progress Series 273, 173–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Castañeda, R. and Defeo, O. (2005) Growth and mortality of transient shrimp populations (Farfantepenaeus spp.) in a coastal lagoon of Mexico: role of the environment and density-dependence. ICES Journal of Marine Science 62, 14–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Farfante, I. (1970) Diagnostic characters of juveniles of the shrimps Penaeus aztecus aztecus, P. duorarum duorarum, and P. brasiliensis (Crustacea, Decapoda, Penaeidae). US Fish and Wildlife Service, Special Scientific Report, Fisheries No. 599, 26 pp.Google Scholar
Pérez-Farfante, I. (1988) Illustrated key to Penaeoid shrimps of commerce in the Americas. NOAA Technical Report NMFS 64, 32 pp.Google Scholar
Renfro, W.C. and Brusher, H.A. (1982) Seasonal abundance, size distribution, and spawning of three shrimps (Penaeus aztecus, P. setiferus, and P. duorarum) in the northwestern Gulf of Mexico, 1961–1962. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS–SEFC-94, 49 pp.Google Scholar
Rozas, L.P. and Minello, T.J. (1998) Nekton use of salt marsh, seagrass, and nonvegetated habitats in a south Texas (USA) estuary. Bulletin of Marine Science 63, 481–501.Google Scholar
SAGARPA (2005) Carta nacional pesquera. Diario Oficial de la Federación, 25 de agosto de 2006 (Primera sección), 21 pp.Google Scholar
Salovius, S. and Kraufvelin, P. (2004) The filamentous alga Cladophora glolmerata as a habitat for littoral macro-fauna in the northern Baltic Sea. Ophelia, 58, 65–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheridan, P.F. (1992) Comparative habitat utilization by estuarine macrofauna within the mangrove ecosystem of Rookery Bay, Florida. Bulletin of Marine Science 50, 21–39.Google Scholar
Tunnel, J.W. Jr and Judd, F.W. (2002) The Laguna Madre of Texas and Tamaulipas. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.Google Scholar
Unsworth, R.K.F., De Grave, S., Jompa, J., Smith, D.J. and Bell, J.J. (2007) Faunal relationships with seagrass habitat structure: a case study using shrimp from the Indo-Pacific. Marine and Freshwater Research 58, 1008–1018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vance, D.J., Haywood, M.D.E., Heales, D.S., Kenyon, R.A. and Loneragan, N.R. (1998) Seasonal and annual variation in abundance of postlarval and juvenile banana prawns Penaeus merguiensis and environmental variation in two estuaries in tropical northeastern Australia: a six year study. Marine Ecology Progress Series 163, 21–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Web, S.R. and Kneib, R.T. (2002) Abundance and distribution of juvenile white shrimp Litopenaeus setiferus within a tidal marsh landscape. Marine Ecology Progress Series 232, 213–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zar, J.H. (1999) Biostatistical analysis, 4th edition. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, R.J., Minello, T.J. and Rozas, L.P. (2000) Salt marsh linkages to productivity of penaeid shrimps and blue crabs in the northern Gulf of Mexico. In Weinstein, M.P. and Kreeger, D.A. (eds) Concepts and controversies in tidal marsh ecology. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 293–314.Google Scholar