Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:34:43.503Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Differences in the swimming behaviour of the amphipod Corophium volutator from different populations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

R.G. Hughes
Affiliation:
Centre for Research in Aquatic Biology, School of Biological Sciences, Queen Mary College, University of London, London, El 4NS
I. M. Horsfall
Affiliation:
Centre for Research in Aquatic Biology, School of Biological Sciences, Queen Mary College, University of London, London, El 4NS

Abstract

The swimming behaviour of Corophium volutator from Wales and East Anglia was investigated to establish whether differences apparent from two previous studies are real or artefacts of the different techniques used. Swimming C. volutator were caught in a Welsh estuary in the summer, but only rarely in the autumn and winter, and in both daylight and darkness. In simulated tidal conditions in the laboratory C. volutator from two sites in East Anglia never swam, while those from Wales swam whenever the substratum was immersed, in daylight and darkness, mostly on the ebb tide and in winter. The unnatural swimming in winter may have been stimulated by laboratory conditions, but the East Anglian amphipods were not so affected. The tidal swimming rhythm is different to east coast C. volutator which only swim at night. This difference may be related to the time of spring tides, when most swimming occurs. In Wales high water of spring tides may occur only in daylight in summer and nocturnal swimming may not be possible. The ebb tide swimming by C. volutator in Wales contrasts with the flood and ebb swimming of east coast amphipods and may reflect differences in their habitats. The former were collected close to the sea while the latter were 15 km up a narrow estuary and may represent a sub-population of amphipods with a disposition to swim early (on the flood tide) enabling them to colonise upstream habitats.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Fincham, A.A., 1970 a. Amphipods in the surf plankton, journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 50, 177198.Google Scholar
Fincham, A.A., 1970 b. Rhythmic behaviour of the intertidal amphipod Bathyporeia pelagica. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 50, 10571068.Google Scholar
Fincham, A.A., 1972. Rhythmic swimming and rheotropism in the amphipod Marinogammarus marinus (Leach). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 8, 1926.Google Scholar
Holmstrom, W.F., 1981. Studies on the Rhythmic Behaviour and General Biology of Corophium volutator (Crustacea: Amphipoda). PhD Thesis, University of Birmingham.Google Scholar
Holmstrom, W.F. & Morgan, E., 1983. Variation in the naturally occurring rhythm of the estuarine amphipod Corophium volutator (Pallas). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 63, 833850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, R.G., 1988. Dispersal by benthic invertebrates: the in situ swimming behaviour of the amphipod Corophium volutator. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 68, 565579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, E., 1965. The activity rhythm of the amphipod Corophium volutator (Pallas) and its possible relationship to changes in hydrostatic pressure associated with the tides. Journal of Animal Ecology, 34, 731746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preece, G.S., 1971. The swimming rhythm of Bathyporeia pilosa (Crustacea: Amphipoda). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 51, 777791.Google Scholar
Shillaker, R.O. & Moore, P.G., 1987. Tube-emergence behaviour in the amphipods Lembos websteri Bate and Corophium bonelli Milne Edwards. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 111, 231241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar