Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T00:54:24.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Diet and feeding strategy of the forkbeard Phycis phycis (Pisces: Phycidae) from the Portuguese continental coast

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2017

Ana Rita Silva ,
Ana Rita Vieira ,
Vera Sequeira ,
Rafaela Barros Paiva ,
Leonel Serrano Gordo  and
Ana Neves
Ana Rita Silva
Affiliation:
Faculdade de Ciências, Departamento de Biologia Animal, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal
Ana Rita Vieira
Affiliation:
MARE – Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal
Vera Sequeira
Affiliation:
Faculdade de Ciências, Departamento de Biologia Animal, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal MARE – Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal
Rafaela Barros Paiva
Affiliation:
MARE – Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal
Leonel Serrano Gordo
Affiliation:
Faculdade de Ciências, Departamento de Biologia Animal, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal MARE – Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal
Ana Neves*
Affiliation:
Faculdade de Ciências, Departamento de Biologia Animal, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal MARE – Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: A. Neves, MARE – Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre & Departamento Biologia Animal, Faculdade de Ciências de Lisboa, Bloco C2, Campo Grande, 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The diet and feeding behaviour of the forkbeard Phycis phycis was studied based on 246 stomachs collected between May 2011 and April 2012 from a commercial fleet operating off the central west coast of Portugal. A total of 44 prey items were identified in the stomachs which were merged into major groups to avoid problems with low expected frequencies. The following taxonomic categories were considered: non-decapod Crustacea, Caridea, Anomura, Munida spp., Processa spp., Brachyura, Pisces, Trisopterus luscus. In order to investigate possible diet differences between fish size classes, a cluster analysis was performed using the mean abundance of each prey group by forkbeard 5 cm length class, and three length groups (LG) were obtained: <22.5, 27.5–37.5 and >42.5 cm. Seasonally, Caridea was the main prey group during winter and autumn while Pisces was predominant during the rest of the year. Caridea was the most important prey group for LG1 and LG2 while in LG3 Pisces was the principal one. The forkbeard feeding behaviour may be characterized as presenting a shift pattern from a more generalist diet (small Crustacea, mainly Caridea) in the young adults to a more specialist strategy (teleosts) in the adults.

Keywords

Phycis phycisforkbearddietfeeding strategy
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 98 , Issue 7 , November 2018 , pp. 1757 - 1765
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abecasis, A.R.C., Canha, A., Reis, D., Pinho, M.R. and Gil-Pereira, J. (2009) Age and growth of the forkbeard Phycis phycis (Gadidae) from the Azorean archipelago, North Atlantic. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 89, 629–633.Google Scholar
Alonso-Fernández, A., Domínguez-Petit, R., Bao, M., Rivas, C. and Saborido-Rey, F. (2008) Spawning pattern and reproductive strategy of female pouting Trisopterus luscus (Gadidae) on the Galician shelf of north-western Spain. Aquatic Living Resources 21, 383–393.Google Scholar
Andersen, N.G. (1999) The effects of predator size, temperature, and prey characteristics on gastric evacuation in whiting. Journal of Fish Biology 54, 287–301.Google Scholar
Anderson, M.J. (2005) PERMANOVA: a FORTRAN computer program for permutational multivariate analysis of variance. Auckland: Department of Statistics, University of Auckland.Google Scholar
Bizzarro, J.J., Robinson, H.J., Rinewalt, C.S. and Ebert, D.A. (2007) Comparative feeding ecology of four sympatric skate species off central California, USA. Environmental Biology of Fishes 80, 197–220.Google Scholar
Bowman, R. E. (1984) Food of silver hake Merluccius bilinearis. Fishery Bulletin 82, 21–35.Google Scholar
Carrassón, M. and Cartes, J. E. (2002) Trophic relationships in a Mediterranean deep-sea fish community: partition of food resources, dietary overlap and connections within the benthic boundary layer. Marine Ecology Progress Series 241, 41–55.Google Scholar
Cartes, J. E., Papiol, V. and Guijarro, B. (2008) The feeding and diet of the deep-sea shrimp Aristeus antennatus off the Balearic Islands (Western Mediterranean): influence of environmental factors and relationship with the biological cycle. Progress in Oceanography 79, 37–54.Google Scholar
Cortés, E. (1997) A critical review of methods of studying fish feeding based on analysis of stomach contents: application to elasmobranch fishes. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 54, 726–738.Google Scholar
Ellis, J.R., Pawson, M.G. and Shackley, S.E. (1996) The comparative feeding ecology of six species of shark and four species of ray (Elasmobranchii) in the north-east Atlantic. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 76, 89–106.Google Scholar
Fanelli, E. and Cartes, J. E. (2008) Spatio-temporal changes in gut contents and stable isotopes in two deep Mediterranean pandalids: influence on the reproductive cycle. Marine Ecology Progressive Series 355, 219–233.Google Scholar
Ferry, L.A., Clark, S.L. and Cailliet, G.M. (1997) Food habits of spotted sand bass (Paralabrax maculatofasciatus, Serranidae) from Bahia de Los Angeles, Baja California. Bulletin of the Southern California Academy of Sciences 96, 1–21.Google Scholar
Glavić, K., Dobroslavić, T., Bartulović, V., Matić-Skoko, S. and Glamuzina, B. (2014) The reproductive biology of forkbeard, Phycis phycis (Linnaeus, 1766) (Phycidae) in the Adriatic Sea (Croatia). Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 14, 165–171.Google Scholar
Gonçalves, J.M. and Erzini, K. (1998) Feeding habits of the two-banded sea bream (Diplodus vulgaris) and the black sea bream (Spondyliosoma cantharus) (Sparidae) from the south-west coast of Portugal. Cybium 22, 245–254.Google Scholar
Hyslop, E. (1980) Stomach content analysis – a review of methods and their application. Journal of Fish Biology 17, 411–429.Google Scholar
INE (2014) Statistical data for fisheries 2001–2013. http://www.ine.pt/xportal/xmain?xpid=INE&xpgid=ine_base_dados (Accessed 8 July 2014).Google Scholar
Ligges, U. and Mächler, M. (2003) Scatterplot3d – an R package for Visualizing Multivariate Data. Journal of Statistical Software 8, 1–20.Google Scholar
Lilly, G.R. (1983) The food of cod on Flemish Cap in Winter 1983. North Atlantic Fisheries Organisation. Scientific Council Research Document 83/VI/65, 1–8.Google Scholar
Matić-Skoko, S., Ferri, J., Škeljo, F., Bartulović, V., Glavić, K. and Glamuzina, B. (2011) Age, growth and validation of otolith morphometrics as predictors of age in the forkbeard, Phycis phycis (Gadidae). Fisheries Research 112, 52–58.Google Scholar
Morato, T., Solà, E., Grós, M.P. and Menezes, G. (1999) Diets of forkbeard (Phycis phycis) and conger eel (Conger conger) off the Azores during Spring of 1996 and 1997. Arquipélago Life and Marine Sciences 17, 51–64.Google Scholar
Morte, M.S., Redón, M.J. and Sanz-Brau, A. (2002) Diet of Phycis blennoides (Gadidae) in relation to fish size and season in the Western Mediterranean (Spain). Marine Ecology 23, 141–155.Google Scholar
Neves, A., Sequeira, V., Paiva, R.B., Vieira, A.R. and Gordo, L.S. (2011) Feeding habits of the bluemouth, Helicolenus dactylopterus dactylopterus (Delaroche, 1809) (Pisces: Sebastidae) in the Portuguese coast. Helgoland Marine Research 66, 189–197.Google Scholar
Oksanen, J. (2011) Multivariate analysis of ecological communities in R: vegan tutorial. Finland: Univ. Oulu. http://cc.oulu.fi/~jarioksa/opetus/metodi/vegantutor.pdf.Google Scholar
Pakhomov, E.A. (1988) Diet of two Antarctic dragonfish (Pisces: Bathydraconidae) from the Indian sector of the Southern Ocean. Antarctic Science 10, 55–61.Google Scholar
Papaconstantinou, C. and Caragitsou, E. (1989) Feeding interaction between two sympatric species Pagrus pagrus and Phycis phycis around Kastellorizo Island (Dodecanese, Greece). Fisheries Research 7, 329–342.Google Scholar
Pauly, D., Trites, A.W., Capuli, E. and Christensen, V. (1998) Diet composition and trophic levels of marine mammals. ICES Journal of Marine Science 55, 467–481.Google Scholar
R Core Team (2015) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org/Google Scholar
Silva, H.M. (1986) Reproduction of the forkbeard, Phycis phycis (Linnaeus, 1766) in the Azorean waters. ICES C.M. 1986/G:60, 1–9.Google Scholar
Svetovidov, A.N. (1986) Gadidae. In Whitehead, P.J.P., Bauchot, M.L., Hureau, J.C., Nielsen, J. and Tortonese, E. (eds) Fishes of the North-eastern Atlantic and the Mediterranean. Paris: Unesco, pp. 680–710.Google Scholar
Vieira, A.R., Neves, A., Sequeira, V., Paiva, R.B. and Gordo, L.S. (2014a) Age and growth of forkbeard, Phycis phycis, in Portuguese continental waters. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 94, 623–630.Google Scholar
Vieira, A.R., Neves, A., Sequeira, V., Paiva, R.B. and Gordo, L.S. (2014b). Otolith shape analysis as a tool for stock discrimination of forkbeard (Phycis phycis) in the Northeast Atlantic. Hydrobiologia 728, 103–110.Google Scholar
Vieira, A.R., Rodrigues, A.S.B., Sequeira, V., Neves, A., Paiva, R.B., Paulo, O.S. and Gordo, L.S. (2016a). Genetic and morphological variation of the forkbeard, Phycis phycis (Pisces, Phycidae): evidence of panmixia and recent population expansion along its distribution area. PLoS ONE 11, e0167045.Google Scholar
Vieira, A.R., Sequeira, V., Neves, A., Paiva, R.B. and Gordo, L.S. (2016b) Reproductive strategy of forkbeard, Phycis phycis, from the Portuguese coast. Helgoland Marine Research 70, 3. doi: 10.1186/s10152-016-0455-x.Google Scholar
Wenner, C.A. (1983) Biology of the longfin hake, Phycis chesteri, in the Western North Atlantic. Biological Oceanography 3, 41–75.Google Scholar
Whitaker, D. and Christman, M. (2015) clustsig: significant cluster analysis. R package version 1.1. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/clustsig/clustsig.pdf.Google Scholar