Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T23:56:58.895Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Development, Fecundity and Brooding Behaviour of the Amphipod, Marinogammarus Obtusatus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

M. Sheader  and
Fu-Shiang Chia
M. Sheader
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology and Dove Marine Laboratory, University of Newcastle, England
Fu-Shiang Chia
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology and Dove Marine Laboratory, University of Newcastle, England
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Marinogammarus obtusatus Dahl, an intertidal amphipod, was first described by Dahl (1938). Prior to this date it appears that this species was often confused with and identified as M. marinus. In later years, M. obtusatus has been shown to be common around the coast of Britain (Sexton & Spooner, 1940), and in a preliminary survey of Cullercoats Bay, Northumberland, we have found that this species is by far the commonest amphipod present.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 50 , Issue 4 , November 1970 , pp. 1079 - 1099
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bate, C. S. & Westwood, J. O. 1863. A History of the British sessile-eyed Crustacea, Vol. 1. London: John van Voorst.Google Scholar
Beadle, L. C. & Cragg, J. B., 1940a. The intertidal zone of two streams and the occurrence of Gammarus spp. on South Rona and Raasay (Inner Hebrides). J. Anim. Ecol., Vol. 9, pp. 289–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beadle, L. C. & Cragg, J. B., 1940b. Studies on adaptation to salinity in Gammarus spp. J. exp. Biol., Vol. 17, pp. 153–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, C., 1942. On the fecundity of some gammarids. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 25, pp. 467–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croker, R. A., 1968. Return of juveniles to the marsupium in the amphipod Neohaustorius schmitzi Bowfield. Crustaceana, Vol. 14, p. 215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, E., 1938. Two new amphipoda of the genus Gammarus from Finmark. K. norske Vidensk. Selsk. Fork., Vol. 10, No. 34, p. 125.Google Scholar
Davis, C. C., 1968. Mechanisms of hatching in aquatic invertebrate eggs. Oceanogr. mar. biol. Ann. Rev. (Ed. H., Barnes), Vol. 6, pp. 325–76. [Publ. 1969.]Google Scholar
Hynes, H. B. N., 1954. The ecology of Gammarus dueberi Lilljeborg and its occurences in fresh water in Western Britain. J. Anim. Ecol., Vol. 23, pp. 38–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hynes, H. B. N., 1955. The reproductive cycle of some British freshwater gammaridae. J. Anim. Ecol., Vol. 24, pp. 352–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, J. P., 1958. The relation between body size and number of eggs in marine malacostrakes. Meddr Danm. Fisk.-og Havunders, N.S., Bd 11, No. 19, pp. 1–25.Google Scholar
Kinne, O., 1960. Gammarus salinus—einige Daten über den Umwelteinfluss auf Wachstum, Häutungsfolge, Herzfrequenz und Eientwicklungsdauer. Crustaceana, Vol. 1, pp. 208–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinne, O., 1961. Growth, molting frequency, heart beat, number of eggs and incubation time in Gammarus zaddachi exposed to different environments. Crustaceana, Vol. 2, pp. 26–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, D. M., 1944. Gammaridae. Synopses of the British Fauna, No. 3. London: Linnaean Soc.Google Scholar
Sexton, E. W., 1924. The moulting and growth-stages of Gammarus, with descriptions of the normal sand intersexes of G. chevreuxi. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 8, pp. 340–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sexton, E. W., 1928. On the rearing and breeding of Gammarus in laboratory conditions. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 15, pp. 33–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sexton, E. W. & Spooner, G. M., 1940. An account of Marinogammarus (Schellenberg) gen.nov. Amphipoda, with a description of a new species, M. pirloti. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 24, pp. 633–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weygoldt, P., 1958. Die Embryonalentwicklung des Amphipoden Gammarus pulex pulex (L.). Zool. Jb. (Anat.), Bd. 77, pp. 51–110.Google Scholar