Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T22:00:50.185Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Defensive behaviour of sea anemones in response to predation by the opisthobranch mollusc Aeolidia papillosa (L.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

M. Edmunds ,
G. W. Potts ,
R. C. Swinfen  and
V. L. Waters
M. Edmunds
Affiliation:
Division of Biology, Preston Polytechnic, Preston PR1 2TQ
G. W. Potts
Affiliation:
The Laboratory, Marine Biological Association, Citadel Hill, Plymouth
R. C. Swinfen
Affiliation:
The Laboratory, Marine Biological Association, Citadel Hill, Plymouth
V. L. Waters
Affiliation:
P.O. Box 103, Arcata, California 95521
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The defensive behaviour of 11 species of sea anemone when attacked by the nudibranch Aeolidia papillosa is described. An attempt is made to correlate their defensive responses with the habitat, and with the food preferences of Aeolidia. Actinia equina responds first by tentacle and column retraction, and then by inflation of the column, pedal locomotion, and detachment from the substrate. Anthopleura elegantissima responds in similar ways, but Anemonia sulcata, which has much longer tentacles, uses these in active defence against the eolid. Anemonia also crawls away but it does not detach.

Actinia, Anthopleura and Anemonia are the preferred foods of Aeolidia. They commonly live in dense colonies where locomotion and detachment are likely to result in escape. Tealia felina is less preferred and is much less responsive when attacked by Aeolidia.

Anemones which possess acontia normally eject these when they are attacked by Aeolidia. Although Aeolidia does occasionally eat acontian anemones, evidence is presented which suggests that acontia have some deterrent effect on this predator. Although most acontian anemones are probably able to move by pedal locomotion and to detach from the substrate, these responses are much less frequently given than by Actinia equina.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 56 , Issue 1 , February 1976 , pp. 65 - 83
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Batham, E. J. & Pantin, C. F. A., 1950. Muscular and hydrostatic action in the sea-anemone Metridium senile (L.). Journal of Experimental Biology, 27, 264–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boutan, L., 1898. Mœurs de l'Eolis papillosa Linné. Archives de zoologie expérimental et générale, series 3, 6. Notes et revue, No. 10: XXXVII–XLII.Google Scholar
Braams, W. G. & Geelen, H. F. M., 1953. The preference of some nudibranchs for certain coelenterates. Archives néerlandaises de zoologie, 10 (3), 241–64.Google Scholar
Edmunds, M., 1966. Protective mechanisms in the Eolidacea (Mollusca, Nudibranchia). Journal of the Linnean Society (Zoology), 46 (308), 27–71.Google Scholar
Edmunds, M., 1974. Defence in animals. 357 pp. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Edmunds, M., Potts, G. W., Swinfen, R. C. & Waters, V. L., 1974. The feeding preferences of Aeolidia papillosa (L.) (Mollusca, Nudibranchia). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 54, 939–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewer, R. F., 1947. On the functions and mode of action of the nematocysts of Hydra. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 117, 365–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraenkel, G. S. & Gunn, D. L., 1940. The orientation of animals. 352 pp. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Gosse, P. H., 1860. A history of the British sea-anemones and corals. 362 pp. London: Van Voorst.Google Scholar
Graham, A., 1938. The structure and function of the alimentary canal of eolid molluscs, with a discussion on their nematocysts. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 59 (2), 267–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadfield, M. G., 1963. The biology of nudibranch larvae. Oikos, 14, 85–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hand, C., 1966. On the evolution of the Actiniaria. Symposia of the Zoological Society of London, 16, 135–46.Google Scholar
Harris, L. G., 1971. Nudibranch associations as symbioses. In Aspects of the biology of symbiosis. Proceedings of a symposium, Boston, Mass., 1969, ed. Cheng, T. C., 77–90. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Harris, L. G., 1973. Nudibranch associations. Current Topics in Comparative Pathobiology, 2, 213–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClendon, J. F., 1906. On the locomotion of a sea anemone (Metridiummarginatum). Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Mass., 143, 440–53.Google Scholar
Miller, M. C., 1961. Distribution and food of the nudibranchiate Mollusca of the south of the Isle of Man. Journal of Animal Ecology, 30, 95–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pantin, C. F. A., 1952. The elementary nervous system. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London (B), 140, 147–68.Google ScholarPubMed
Parker, G. H., 1917. Pedal locomotion in actinians. Journal of Experimental Zoology, 22 (1), 111–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, R., 1970. Review of the predators and parasites of stony corals, with special reference to symbiotic prosobranch gastropods. Pacific Science, 24 (1), 43–54.Google Scholar
Robson, E. A., 1966. Swimming in Actiniaria. Symposia of the Zoological Society of London, 16, 333–60.Google Scholar
Rosin, R., 1969. Escape response of the sea-anemone Anthopleura nigrescens (Verrill) to its predatory eolid nudibranch Herviella baba, spec.nov. Veliger, 12 (1), 74–7.Google Scholar
Russell, H. D., 1942. Observations on the feeding of Aeolidia papillosa L., with notes on the hatching of the veligers of Cuihona amoena A. & H. Nautilus, 55 (3), 80–2.Google Scholar
Stehouwer, H., 1952. The preference of the slug Aeolidia papillosa (L.) for the sea anemone Metridium senile (L.). Archives néerlandaises de zoologie, 10 (2), 161–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swennen, C., 1961. Data on distribution, reproduction and ecology of the nudibranchiate molluscs occurring in the Netherlands. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research, 1 (1–2), 191–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, T. E., 1964. Grazing and the life cycles of British nudibranchs. In Grazing in terrestrial and marine environments. British Ecological Society Symposium, ed. D. J. Crisp, 4, 275–97. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Waters, V. L., 1973. Food preference of the nudibranch Aeolidia papillosa, and the effect of the defenses of the prey on predation. Veliger, 15 (3), 174–92.Google Scholar
Wolter, H., 1967. Beiträge zur Biologie, Histologie und Sinnesphysiologie (insbesondere der Chemorezeption) einiger Nudibranchier (Mollusca, Opisthobranchia) der Nordsee. Zeitschrift für Morphologie und Ökologie der Tiere, 60 (4), 275–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar