Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T15:17:41.540Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Characterization of the lesser known Korean seerfish Scomberomorus koreanus (Kishinouye, 1915) (Scombriformes: Scombridae) in Indian waters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 November 2022

Subal Kumar Roul*
Affiliation:
ICAR-Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Cochin 682 018, Kerala, India
N. S. Jeena
Affiliation:
ICAR-Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Cochin 682 018, Kerala, India
Prathibha Rohit
Affiliation:
ICAR-Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Cochin 682 018, Kerala, India
*
Author for correspondence: Subal Kumar Roul, E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Scomberomorus koreanus was originally described from a single specimen from the west coast of Korea. In 1964 the species was synonymized with S. guttatus during the systematic review of the scombroid fishes of India. Subsequently, S. koreanus was discovered in Palk Bay in 1976, confirming its first record from India and the Indian Ocean. Since then, no such detailed taxonomic studies have been undertaken for the species along the Indian coast. Although the species is distributed in the Indo-West Pacific region and forms a commercially important fishery in part of its range, S. koreanus is poorly known and very limited taxonomic studies have been carried out in detail which usually results in misidentifications at field level. The present morpho-genetic investigation and previous molecular study by the authors confirmed the occurrence of the species in the coastal waters of both the Bay of Bengal and the Arabian Sea. The exact characteristics of S. koreanus are detailed here, and their comparison was made here with the related species S. guttatus found in the northern part of the east coast of India, based on a thorough morphological study, including the radiographs of 13 fresh specimens (334–588 mm FL), colour photographs of S. koreanus collected in 2019–2021 and DNA barcoding.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bloch, ME and Schneider, JG (1801) Systema ichthyologieiconibus CX illustratura post obitumarectories opus inchoatumobsoluit, correxit, interpohrit Jo. Berlin: Gottob Schneider Sano, 231 pp.Google Scholar
Collette, BB (2003) Family Scombridae Rafinesque, 1815 – mackerels, tunas, and bonitos. California Academy of Sciences Annotated Checklists of Fishes 19, 128.Google Scholar
Collette, BB and Chao, LN (1975) Systematics and morphology of the bonitos (Sarda) and their relatives (Scombridae, Sardini). Fishery Bulletin NOAA/NMFS 73, 516625.Google Scholar
Collette, BB and Nauen, CE (1983) FAO Species Catalogue. Vol. 2. Scombrids of the World. An Annotated and Illustrated Catalogue of Tunas, Mackerels, Bonitos and Related Species Known to Date. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) Fisheries Synopsis number 125, p. 137.Google Scholar
Collette, BB and Russo, JL (1979) An introduction to the Spanish mackerels, genus Scomberomorus. In Nakamura, EL and Bullis, HR Jr. (eds), Proceedings of the Mackerel Colloquium, Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission, no. 4, pp. 316.Google Scholar
Collette, BB and Russo, JL (1980) Scomberomorus munroi, a new species of Spanish mackerel from Australia and New Guinea. Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 31, 241250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collette, BB and Russo, J (1984) Morphology, systematic and biology of Spanish mackerels (Scomberomorus, Scombridae). Fishery Bulletin NOAA/NMFS 82, 612616.Google Scholar
Collette, BB, Russo, JL and Zavala-Camin, LA (1978) Scomberomorus brasiliensis, a new species of Spanish mackerel from the western Atlantic. Fishery Bulletin NOAA/NMFS 76, 273280.Google Scholar
Cuvier, G and Valenciennes, A (1832) Histoire naturelle des poissons. Tome huitième, Livre neuvième. Des Scombéroïdes. v. 8: i–xix + 5 pp. + 1–509, Pls. 209245.Google Scholar
Day, F (1878) The fishes of India; being a natural history of the fishes known to inhabit the seas and fresh water of India, Burma and Ceylon. London, vol. 1 (text), 778 pp., vol. 2 (plates). (Reprint edition, 1958).Google Scholar
de Beaufort, LF and Chapman, WM (1951) The Fishes of the Indo-Australian Archipelago, vol. 9. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 484 pp.Google Scholar
Delsman, DH (1931) Fish eggs and larvae from the Java Sea. Treubia 13, 401410.Google Scholar
Devaraj, M (1975) Osteology and relationships of the Spanish mackerels and seerfishes of the tribe Scomberomorini. Indian Journal of Fisheries 22, 167.Google Scholar
Devaraj, M (1976) Discovery of the scombrid Scomberomorus koreanus (Kishinouye) in India, with taxonomic discussion on the species. Japanese Journal of Ichthyology 23, 7987.Google Scholar
Fraser-Brunner, A (1950) The fishes of the family Scombridae. Journal of Natural History 12, 131163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, RH Jr. and Collette, BB (1967) Comparative anatomy and systematics of the tunas, genus Thunnus. Fishery Bulletin, United States Fish and Wildlife Service, 66, 65130.Google Scholar
James, PSBR (2008) Osteo-taxonomic distinction of fishes of the family Leiognathidae. Indian Journal of Fisheries 55, 305310.Google Scholar
Jeena, NS, Rahuman, S, Roul, SK, Abdul Azeez, P, Vinothkumar, R, Manas, HM, Nesnas, EA, Margaret Muthu Rathinam, A, Surya, S, Rohit, P, Abdussamad, EM and Gopalakrishnan, A (2022) Resolved and redeemed: a new fleck to the evolutionary divergence in genus Scomberomorus Lacepède, 1801 (Scombridae) with cryptic speciation. Frontiers in Marine Science 9, 888463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, S and Silas, EG (1961) On the fishes of the subfamily Scomberomorinae (Family Scombridae) from Indian waters. Indian Journal of Fisheries 8, 188206.Google Scholar
Jones, S and Silas, EG (1964) A systematic review of the scombroid fishes of India. Symposium on Scombroid Fishes, pt. 1, Marine Biological Association of India, Mandapam Camp, S. India pp. 1–105.Google Scholar
Kamohara, T (1967) Fishes of Japan in Color. Osaka, Japan: Hoikusha Publishing Co., 135 pp.Google Scholar
Kishinouye, K (1915) A study of the mackerels, cybiids, and tunas. Suisan Gakkai Ho 1, 124 (transl. by W.F. Van Campen, POFI 1949).Google Scholar
Kishinouye, K (1923) Contributions to the comparative study of the so-called scombroid fishes. Journal of the College of Agriculture, Imperial University of Tokyo 8, 293475.Google Scholar
Kumar, S, Stecher, G, Li, M, Knyaz, C and Tamura, K (2018) MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Molecular Biology and Evolution 35, 1547.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kyushin, K, Amaoka, K, Nakaya, K, Ida, H, Tanino, Y and Senta, T (1982) Fishes of the South China Sea. Tokyo: Japan Marine Fishery Research Center, 333 pp.Google Scholar
Lee, SC and Yang, HC (1983) Fishes of the Suborder Scombroidei of Taiwan. Bulletin of the Institute of Zoology, Academia Sinica 22, 217242.Google Scholar
Leray, M, Knowlton, N, Ho, SL, Nguyen, BN and Machida, RJ (2019) GenBank is a reliable resource for 21st century biodiversity research. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 116, 2265122656.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mori, T (1928) A catalogue of the fishes of Korea. Journal of the Pan-Pacific Research Institution 3, 38.Google Scholar
Mori, T (1952) Check list of the fishes of Korea. Memories of the Hyogo University of Agriculture 1, 1228.Google Scholar
Munro, ISR (1943) Revision of Australian species of Scomberomorus. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum 12, 6595.Google Scholar
Nakamura, H (1939) A note on tunnies with a list of scombroid fishes from Formosa waters. Republic of Taiwan Government General Fisheries Export Statistics 13, 914.Google Scholar
Nakamura, I and Nakamura, R (1982) New records of two species of Scomberomorus from Japan. Japanese Journal of Ichthyology 28, 445449.Google Scholar
Orrell, TM, Collette, BB and Johnson, GD (2006) Molecular data support separate scombroid and xiphioid clades. Bulletin of Marine Science 79, 505519.Google Scholar
Psomadakis, PN, Osmany, HB and Moazzam, M (2015) Field Identification Guide to the Living Marine Resources of Pakistan. FAO Species Identification Guide for Fishery Purposes. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 386 pp.Google Scholar
Psomadakis, P, Thein, H, Russell, BC and Tun, MT (2019) Field Identification Guide to the Living Marine Resources of Myanmar. FAO Species Identification Guide for Fishery Purposes. Rome: FAO and MOALI, 694 pp.Google Scholar
Russell, DW and Sambrook, J (2001) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, vol. 1. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, p. 112.Google Scholar
Silas, EG (1964) Cybium croockewitii Bleeker (1850) and C. koreanum Kishinouye (1915) considered synonyms of Scomberomorus guttatus (Bloch and Schneider) with a redescription and annotated bibliography of S. guttatus. Symposium on Scombroid Fishes, pt. 1, Marine Biological Association of India, Mandapam Camp, S. India pp. 309–342.Google Scholar
Soldatov, VK and Lindberg, GJ (1930) A review of the fishes of the seas of the Far East. Izv. Tikhookean. Nauchno Promysl. Stn. 5, 576 pp. (in Russian). Transl. by National Marine Fisheries Service, Washington.Google Scholar
Ward, RD, Hanner, R and Hebert, PDN (2009) The campaign to DNA barcode all fishes. Journal of Fish Biology 74, 329356.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ward, RD, Zemlak, TS, Innes, BH, Last, PR and Hebert, PD (2005) DNA barcoding Australia's fish species. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 360, 18471857.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed