Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-03T15:30:42.851Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Carotenoid pigments in the optic cushion of Marthasterias glacialis (L.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Norman Millott  and
H. G. Vevers
Norman Millott
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University College of the West Indies, Jamaica, B.W.I.
H. G. Vevers
Affiliation:
The Plymouth Laboratory
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The optic cushion of Marthasterias glacialis is seen to contain yellowish orange and reddish orange pigments. The former occurs throughout the cushion, the latter is confined to the wall of the optic cups and a few scattered, irregular patches. Both pigments occur in the cytoplasm of long and narrow or irregular cells, some in the form of granules or vacuoles.

Optic cushions yield an orange extract in methanol which decomposes in light.

The behaviour of methanolic extracts after partitioning, saponification, chromatographic separation and spectrophotometric examination indicates the presence of β-carotene and esterified astaxanthin.

The significance of the results in relation to previous findings and their possible bearing on photoreception is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 34 , Issue 2 , June 1955 , pp. 279 - 287
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1955

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cowles, R. P., 1910. Preliminary report on the behavior of echinoderms. Yearb. Carneg. Instn, no. 8, pp. 128–9.Google Scholar
Cowles, R. P. 1911. Reaction to light and other points in the behavior of the starfish. Pap. Tortugas Lab., Vol. III, pp. 97–110.Google Scholar
Fox, D. L. 1953. Animal Biochromes and Structural Colours. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fox, D. L. & Millott, N., 1954. The pigmentation of the jellyfish Pelagia noctiluca(Forskål) var. panopyra Péron and Lesueur. Proc. roy. Soc. B, Vol. 142, pp. 392–408.Google ScholarPubMed
Frisch, K. Von., 1909. Biologie des Seesterns Asterias forreri. Naturw. Wschr., N.F., Bd. 8, pp. 488–91.Google Scholar
Hartline, H. K., Wagner, H. G. & Macnichol, E. F. Jnr. , 1952. The peripheral origin of nervous activity in the visual system. Cold Spr. Harb. Symp. quant. Biol., Vol. 17, pp. 125–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kennedy, G. Y. & Vevers, H. G., 1953. The biology of Asterias rubens. L. V. A porphyrin pigment in the integument. J. Mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 32, pp. 235–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lönnberg, E. 1933. Zur Kenntnis der Carotinoide bei marinen Evertebraten. Ark. Z00L, Bd. 25A, Nr. 1., 17 pp.Google Scholar
Lönnberg, E. & Hellstrom, H., 1931. Zur Kenntnis der Carotinoide bei marinen Evertebraten. Ark. Zool., Bd. 23A, Nr. 15, 74 pp.Google Scholar
Maccurdy, H. M., 1912. Observations on the reactions of Asterias forbesii to light. Science, N.S., Vol. 35, p. 192.Google Scholar
Mangold, E., 1909. Sinnesphysiologische Untersuchungen an Echinodermen. Ihre Reaktionen auf Licht und Schatten und die negative Geotaxis bei Asterina. Z. allg. Physiol., Bd. 9, pp. 112–46.Google Scholar
Millott, N., 1954. Sensitivity to light and the reactions to changes in light intensity of the echinoid Diadema antillarum Philippi. Phil. Trans. B, Vol. 238, pp. 187–220.Google Scholar
Smith, J. E., 1937. On the nervous system of the starfish Marthasterias glacialis (L). Phil. Trans. B, Vol. 227, pp. 111–73.Google Scholar
Vevers, H. G., 1952. The biology of Asterias rubens L. III. Carotenoid pigments in the integument. J. Mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 30, 569–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wald, G., 1945. The chemical evolution of vision. Harvey Lect., Ser. 41, pp. 117–60.Google Scholar
Weel, P. B. Van, 1935. Über die Lichtempfindlichkeit der Ambulakralfusschen des Seesterns (Asterias rubens). Arch, neerl. Zool. T. 1, pp. 347–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar