Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:36:16.420Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The breeding cycle and growth of open coast and estuarine populations ofLittorina littorea

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

J. D. Fish
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University College of Wales, Aberystwyth

Extract

The breeding cycle and growth of a population of Littorina littorea (L.)from an exposed rocky shore is compared with a population from a neighbouring sheltered estuarine habitat. The estuarine population matures earlier in the year, and maximum spawning activity is recorded in January compared with March on the open coast. This is considered to be the result of the higher nutritional status of the estuary. Egg capsules and veliger larvae have been found amongst the detritus on the estuary, and the establishment of an earlier settlement in this population is explained by concluding that a substantial proportion of the egg capsules do not leave the estuary, but undergo their full development in the moist detritus. At both localities individuals are sexually mature at a shell height of about 11–12 mm. Snails from the estuary reproduce for the first time during their second winter compared with the second or third winter for the open coast population.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Caullery, M. & Pelseneer, P. 1910. Sur la ponte et le developpement du vignot (Littorina Httorea.) Bull, scient. Fr. Belg., T. 44, pp. 357–60.Google Scholar
Elmhirst, R. 1923. Notes on the breeding and growth of marine animals in the Clyde sea area. Rep. Scott, mar. biol. Ass., 1922, pp. 19–43.Google Scholar
Fretter, V. & Graham, A. 1962. British Prosobranch Molluscs. 755 pp. London: Ray Society.Google Scholar
Harding, J. P. 1949. The use of probability paper for the graphical analysis of polymodal frequency distributions. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 28, pp. 141–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, F. R. 1929. Contributions to the study of marine gastropods. III. Development, growth and behaviour of Littorina. Contr. Can. Biol. Fish., N.S., Vol. 4, pp. 413–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haynes, J. & Dobson, M. 1969. Physiography, foraminifera and sedimentationin the Dovey estuary (Wales). Geol. J., Vol. 6, pp. 217–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambert, T. C. & Farley, J. 1968. The effectof parasitism by the trematode Cryptocotyle lingua (Creplin) on zonation and winter migration of the common periwinkle, Littorina Httorea (L.). Can. J. Zool., Vol. 46, pp. 1139–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebour, M. V. 1937. The eggs and larvae of the British prosobranchs with special reference to those living in the plankton. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 22, pp. 105–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebour, M. V. 1947. Notes on the inshore plankton of Plymouth. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 26, pp. 527–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Linke, O. 1933. Morphologie und Physiologie der Genital-apparatus der Nordseelittorinen. Wiss. Meeresuntersuch. (Abt. Helgoland), Bd. 19, abh. Nr. 5, 60 pp.Google Scholar
Moore, H. B. 1937. The biology of Littorina Httorea. Part I. Growth of the shell and tissues, spawning, length of life and mortality. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 21, pp. 721–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newell, G. E. 1958a. The behaviour of Littorina Httorea (L.) under natural conditions and its relation to position on the shore. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 37, pp. 229–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newell, G. E. 1958b. An experimental analysis of the behaviour of Littorina Httorea (L.) under natural conditions and in the laboratory. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K. Vol. 37, pp. 241–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newell, R. CPye, V. I. & Ahsanullah, M. 1971. Factors affecting the feeding rate of the winkle Littorina Httorea. Mar. Biol., Vol. 9, pp. 138–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, J. E. & Newell, G. E. 1955. The dynamics of the zonation of the common periwinkle Littorina Httorea (L.) on a stony beach. J. Anim. Ecol., Vol. 24, pp. 3556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tattersall, W. M. 1920. Notes on the breeding habits andlife history of the periwinkle. Scient. Invest. Fish. Brch Ire., Vol.1, pp. 111.Google Scholar
Thorson, G. 1946. Reproduction and larval development ofDanish marine bottom invertebrates, with special reference to the planktonic larvaein the Sound (0resund). Meddr. Kommn. Havunders., Serie Plankton, Bd.4, No. 1, 523 pp.Google Scholar
Williams, E. E. 1964. The growth and distribution of Littorina Httorea (L.) ona rocky shore in Wales. J. Anim. Ecol., Vol. 33, pp. 413–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar