Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T13:08:09.259Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The biology of a commensal copepod, Ascidicola rosea Thorell, in the ascidian Corella parallelogramma (Müller)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

R. V. Gotto
R. V. Gotto
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, Queen's University, Belfast
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A study has been made of the feeding activities and reproductive behaviour of the copepod Ascidicola rosea within one of its ascidian hosts, Corella parallelogramma.

Ascidicola rosea feeds on particles which it removes from the food string as the latter is passing through the oesophagus of the host. When active feeding is not taking place, the copepod remains quiescent in the oesophageal bend. An inverted position within the oesophagus is sometimes adopted; this is generally associated with a meagre development of the food string. Certain peculiar structural features—notably the spinous pad on the penultimate segment and the long endopodal setae—are considered to be adaptations which assist the copepod while clinging to the food string.

The eggs of A. rosea are deposited in the ascidian's stomach and the nauplii pass through the host's alimentary canal still enveloped by the inner egg membrane. On reaching the anus, hatching takes place and the nauplii are expelled from the atrial siphon. There are four naupliar and two copepodid stages. Free-swimming life lasts for about 6 days.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 36 , Issue 2 , June 1957 , pp. 281 - 290
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1957

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berrill, N. J., 1950. The Tunicata, with an Account of the British Species. London:Ray Soc.Google Scholar
Brady, G. S., 1878. A Monograph of the Free and Semi-Parasitic Copepoda of the British Islands, Vol. 1. London: Ray Soc.Google Scholar
Canu, E., 1892. Les copepodes du Boulonnais. Trav. Sta. zool. Wimereux, Vol. 6, 354 pp.Google Scholar
Chatton, E. & Brément, E., 1915. Les oostégites, les ptérostégites et la cavité incubatrice des Ascidicolidae (Copépodes); développement, homologies, valeur phylogenitique et taxonomique. Bull. Soc. zool. Fr., Vol. 40, pp. 143–55Google Scholar
Chatton, E. & Harant, H., 1924. Lequerrea perezi n.g., n.sp., enterocolien parasite d'une ascidie simple. Bull. Soc. zool. Fr., Vol. 49, pp. 24–30.Google Scholar
Lang, K., 1948. Copepoda ‘Notodelphyoida’ from the Swedish west-coast with an outline on the systematics of the copepods. Ark. Zool., Bd. 40 A, pt. 14, 36 pp.Google Scholar
Lang, K., 1949. On a new copepod family related to Notodelphyidae and on two new copepod species from South-Georgia. Ark. Zool., Bd. 42 B5 pt. 4, 7 pp.Google Scholar
Marshall, S. M. & Orr, A. P., 1952. On the biology of Calanus finmarchicus. VII. Factors affecting egg production. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 30, pp. 527–47.Google Scholar
Marshall, S. M. & Orr, A. P., 1954. Hatching in Calanus finmarchicus and some other copepods. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 33, pp. 393–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, S. M. & Orr, A. P., 1955. The Biology of a Marine Copepod, Calanus finmarchicus (Gunnerus). Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Sars, G. O., 1921. An Account of the Crustacea of Norway, Vol. 8. Copepoda Monstrilloida and Notodelphyoida.Google Scholar
Schellenberg, A., 1921. Neue Notodelphyiden des Berliner und Hamburger Museums. II. Teil. Mitt. zool. Mus. Berl., Bd. 10, pp. 277–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar