Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-11T01:07:55.986Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Benthos of a Marine Fly-Ash Dumping Ground

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Roger N. Bamber
Roger N. Bamber
Affiliation:
Dove Marine Laboratory, Cullercoats, North Shields, Tyne and Wear, NE PZ
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The benthic fauna of a fly-ash dumping ground off the Northumberland coast has been studied in comparison with that of the surrounding natural sediments and a designated offshore spoil ground. Continued ash dumping has resulted in an increase in the silt fraction of the sediments, together with the appearance of pozzolanic aggregates at the sites of greatest dumping, some 3·5 km offshore. The sediments here show a more rapid decline in Eh values with depth. The natural benthic macrofauna represented a typical Echinocardium-filiformis community, giving way throughout the offshore spoil ground to a ‘ Paraonis-Magelona’ community dominated by smaller polychaete species more tolerant of poor sediments, while the stations at the centre of the ash dumping showed an anomalous community structure. The density of the fauna was reduced at the centre of the ash dumping, the worst station yielding only eight individuals in 0·2m. Contours of numbers of macrofaunal individuals and species, of faunistic diversity and biomass, and of meiofaunal numbers all show a similar pattern of some depression along the spoil ground, and greater depression at the ash-dumping centre. Statistical analyses confirm a significant negative correlation between faunistic parameters and ash content. Deposit-feeding species represented a lower proportion of the community at sites of high ash content. The negative correlation between faunistic diversity and ash content was statistically significant over an area of 43 km around the centre of the dumping. The faunistic impoverishment is considered mainly to be a response to the dumping per se, and options for reducing this effect are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 64 , Issue 1 , February 1984 , pp. 211 - 226
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bamber, R. N. 1978. The Effects of Dumped Pulverised Fuel Ash on the Benthic Fauna of the Northumberland Coast. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Newcastle-upon-Tyne.Google Scholar
Bamber, R. N. 1980a. A summary of the effects of dumped pulverised fuel ash on the benthic fauna of the Northumberland coast. Laboratory Report. Central Electricity Research Laboratory, RD/L/R 2019, 20 pp.Google Scholar
Bamber, R. N. 1980b. Properties of fly ash as a marine sediment. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 11, 323–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellan, G. 1967. Pollution et peuplements benthiques sur substrat meuble dans la région de Marseille. II. L'ensemble portuaire marseillais. Revue internationale d'océanographie médicale, 8, 51–59.Google Scholar
Bourcier, M. 1969. Ecoulement des ‘bouges rouges’ dans le canyon de la Casidaigne (Decembre 1968). Tèthys, i, 779–782.Google Scholar
Buchanan, J. B. 1963. The bottom fauna communities and their sediment relationships off the coast of Northumberland. Oikos, 14, 154–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, J. B. 1964. The Sediments of the South Northumberland Coast. Final Report of the Investigation of Sea outfall prepared by J. D. and D. M. Watson, for the Technical Sub-Committee as to Tyneside Sewage Disposal, May 1964. Appendix L, pp. 89–90. [Unpublished.]Google Scholar
Buchanan, J. B. 1965. Silt transport and the distribution of macrobenthic animals off the Northumberland coast. Report of the Challenger Society, 3, 45Google Scholar
Buchanan, J. B. 1971. Measurement of the physical and chemical environment. In Methods for the Study of Marine Benthos (ed. N. A. Holme and A. D. Mclntyre,) pp. 30–58. Blackwell Scientific Publications. [IBP Handbook no. 16.] Dove MarineLaboratory, 1974. Dove Marine Laboratory research report on the benthic survey around the proposed sludge dumping ground. [Unpublished.]Google Scholar
Eagle, R. A.Hardiman, P. A.Norton, M. G.Nunny, R. S. & Rolfe, M. S. 1979. The field assessment of dumping wastes at sea. 5. The disposal of solid wastes off the north-east coast of England. Fisheries Research Technical Report, Lowestoft, no. 51, 34 pp.Google Scholar
Faber, J. H. & Babcock, A. W. 1974. Fly ash pioneers a reclamation economy as energy/resource challenges confront engineering community. Professional Engineer, Chicago 44 (7), 18–22.Google Scholar
Fenchel, T. 1969. The ecology of marine microbenthos. 4. Structure and function of the benthic ecosystem, its chemical and physical factors, and the microfauna communities with special reference to the ciliated Protozoa. Ophelia, 6, 1–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, J. S. 1974. Animal-sediment relationships. Oceanography and Marine Biology, an Annual Review, 12, 233–261.Google Scholar
Jones, D. J. 1973. Variation in the trophic structure and species composition of some invertebrate communities in polluted kelp forests in the North Sea. Marine Biology, 20, 351–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanneworff, E. & Nicolaisen, W. 1973. The ‘Haps’ frame-supported bottom corer. Ophelia, 10, 119–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margalef, R. 1968. Perspectives in Ecological Theory. 111 pp. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Minnick, L. J.Webster, W. C. & PurdyE. J. JR, E. J. JR, 1970. Prediction of fly ash performance. Information Circular. U.S. Bureau of Mines, no. 8488, 32–49.Google Scholar
Pfitzenmeyer, H. T. 1970. Gross Physical and Biological Effects of Overboard Spoil Disposal in Upper Chesapeake Bay. Project C: Benthos. Special Report. Natural Resources Institute, no. 3, 26–38.Google Scholar
Pielou, E. C. 1966. The measurement of diversity in different types of biological collections. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 13, 131–144.,CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Probert, P. K. 1975. The bottom fauna of china clay waste deposits in Mevagissey Bay. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 55, 19–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, H. L. 1958. Benthic studies in Buzzards Bay. 1. Animal-sediment relationships. Limnology and Oceanography, 3, 245–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schäfer, W. 1972. Ecology and Palaeoeco logy of Marine Environments. 418 pp. Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd.Google Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. 1959. Statistical Methods Applied to Experiments in Agriculture and Biology, 5th edition. 534 pp. Iowa State College Press.Google Scholar
Southwood, T. R. E. 1968. Ecological Methods, with Particular Reference to the Study of Insect Populations. 391 pp. London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
Turk, T. R. & Risk, M. J. 1981. Effect of sedimentation on infaunal invertebrate populations of Cobequid Bay, Bay of Fundy. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 38, 642–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warwick, R. M. & Buchanan, J. B. 1970. The meiofauna off the coast of Northumberland. I. The structure of the nematode population. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. 50, 129–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watt, J. D. & Thorne, D. J. 1965. The composition and pozzolanic properties of pulverised fuel ashes. Journal of Applied Chemistry, 15, 585–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiser, W. 1959. The effect of grain size of the distribution of small invertebrates inhabiting the beaches of Puget Sound. Limnology and Oceanography, 4, 181–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodhead, P. M. J.Duedall, I. W. & Lansing, N. F. 1979. Coal Waste Artificial Reef Program, Phase I. Electric Power Research Institute. FP11252 Research Project 1341–1. Interim Report, 76 pp. New York: New York State Energy Research and Development Authority.Google Scholar