Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T15:35:42.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The benthos of a coastal power station thermal discharge canal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

R. N. Bamber  and
J. F. Spencer
R. N. Bamber
Affiliation:
Marine Biological Unit, C.E.G.B., Fawley, Southampton, SO TW
J. F. Spencer
Affiliation:
Marine Biological Unit, C.E.G.B., Fawley, Southampton, SO TW
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Kingsnorth Power Station, on the River Medway Estuary, Kent, discharges cooling water into a canalcomprising a 4 km creek system. A comprehensive investigation of the sublittoral benthic fauna of the discharge system was undertaken from January 1979 to September 1981. The benthic macrofauna was sampled monthly at five stations along the system and a sixth in the River Medway adjacent to the creek mouth (DC4); salinity, sea-bed temperature, sediment particle size, sediment redox potential, residual chlorine and meiofaunal numbers were measured. The macrofauna is significantly suppressed at sites along the discharge canal, representing a community with half the number of species as at station DC4, comprising dense populations of a few dominant opportunistic species tolerant of thermal stress (e.g.Tubificoides, Cauleriella), and not those characteristic of organic pollution stress communities. The latter are regular summer immigrants in the creek, but persist only in low numbers if at all in the winter (e.g.Polydora ciliata). This suppression is the result of a 10°C temperature front between the heated discharge water and ambient estuarine water, passing over the sea bed with the ebbing and flooding tide four times each day. The residual gradient of mean temperature along the discharge canal causes some changes in the dominance of those species not eliminated by the temperature front. These temperature effects are expected to be localized, mainly in the area of sea-bed impingement of the discharge water; they are predicted to occur at any thermal discharge in tidal waters where the heated effluent contacts the sea bed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 64 , Issue 3 , August 1984 , pp. 603 - 623
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andrews, M. J. & Rickard, D. G. 1980. Rehabilitation of the inner Thames estuary. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 11, 327–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bamber, R. N. 1978. The Effects of Dumped Pulverised Fuel Ash on the Benthic Fauna of the Northumberland Coast. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Newcastle-upon-Tyne.Google Scholar
Bamber, R. N. 1980. The sublittoral fauna of Kingsnorth outfall lagoon, November 1978. Internal Note. Central Electricity Generating Board, RD/L/ N 114/80, 14 pp.Google Scholar
Bamber, R. N. 1982a. Sodium hexametaphosphate as an aid in benthic sample sorting. Marine Environmental Research, 7, 251–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bamber, R. N. 1982b. The effect of a coarse p.f. ash spillage on a fine marine sediment.Internal Note. Central Electricity Generating Board, TPRD/L/2314 N82, 9 pp.Google Scholar
Bamber, R. N. 1982c. A ‘Basic’ similarity analysis program for the HP9845 computer.Internal Note. Central Electricity Generating Board, TPRD/L/2315 P82, 29 pp.Google Scholar
Barnett, P. R. O. 1971. Some changes in intertidal sand communities due to thermal pollution. Proceedings of the Royal Society (B), 177, 353–364.Google Scholar
Brehaut, R. N. 1982. Ecology of Rocky Shores. 58 pp. London: Edward Arnold. [Institute of Biology Studies in Biology no. 139.]Google Scholar
Brinkhurst, R. O. 1982. British and other marine and estuarine oligochaetes. Synopses of the British Fauna, no. 21, 160 pp.Google Scholar
Buchanan, J. B. 1971. Measurement of the physical and chemical environment. Sediments. In Methods for the Study of Marine Benthos (ed. Holme, N. A. and Mclntyre, A. D.) pp. 30–51. Blackwell Scientific Publications. [IBP Handbook no. 16.]Google Scholar
Burbanck, W. D.Grabske, R. & Cromer, J. R. 1964. The use of the radioisotope, Zinc 65, in a preliminary study of population movements of the estuarine isopod, Cyathura polita (Stimpson, 1855).Crustaceana 7, 17–20.Google Scholar
Chapman, P. M.Farrell, M. A. & Brinkhurst, R. O. 1982. Relative tolerances of selected aquatic oligochaetes to individual pollutants and environmental factors. Aquatic Toxicology, 2, 47–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coughlan, J. & Whitehouse, J. W. 1977. Aspects of chlorine utilisation in the United Kingdom. Chesapeake Science, 18, 102–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gascoine, I. S. & Wildish, D. J. 1971. A chemical and biological study of the Medway Estuary. Water Pollution Control. 1971, 11–25.Google Scholar
Gonzalez, J. G. & Yevich, P. P. 1977. Seasonal variation in theresponses of estuarine populations to heated water in the vicinity of a steam generating plant. Contributions of the Department of Marine Science, University of Puerto Rico, 15, 127–142.Google Scholar
Grassle, J. F. & Grassle, J. P. 1974. Opportunistic life histories and genetic systems in marine benthic polychaetes. Journal of Marine Research, 32, 253–284.Google Scholar
Hunter, J. & Arthur, D. R. 1978. Some aspects of the ecology ofPeloscolex benedeni Udekem (Oligochaeta: Tubificidae) in the Thames Estuary. Estuarine, Coastal and Marine Science, 6, 197–208.Google Scholar
Kirby, R. 1969. Sedimentary Environments, Processes and River History in the Lower Medway Estuary, Kent. Ph.D. Thesis, University of London.Google Scholar
Logan, D. T. & Maurer, D. 1975. Diversity of marine invertebrates in a thermal effluent. Journal of the Water Pollution Control Federation, 47, 515–523.Google Scholar
Mclusky, D. S. 1982. The impact of petrochemical effluent on the fauna of an intertidal estuarine mudflat. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 14, 489–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markowski, S. 1959. The cooling water of power stations: a new factor in the environment of marine and freshwater invertebrates. Journal of Animal Ecology, 28, 243–258.Google Scholar
Palin, A. T. 1972. Chlorine Method 3. In Colorimetric Chemical Analytical Methods (ed. Thomas, L. C. and Chamberlin, G. J.) pp. 141–144. Salisbury, U.K.: Tintometer Co. Ltd.Google Scholar
Parker, J. G. 1980. Effects of pollution upon the benthos of Belfast Lough. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 11, 80–83.Google Scholar
Rafaelli, D. G. & Mason, C. F. 1981. Pollution monitoring with meiofauna, using the ratio of nematodes to copepods. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 12, 158–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soulsby, P. G.Lowthion, D. & Houston, M. 1981. Chemical and biological studies of the estuaries and coastal waters of Hampshire and the Isle of Wight. Internal Report. Southern Water Authority, 3/4/2,30 pp.Google Scholar
Southwood, T. R. E. 1968. Ecological Methods, with Particular Reference to the Study of Insect Populations. 391 pp. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Spencer, J. F. 1975. Kingsnorth Power Station - water temperature studies in the cooling water discharge channel with one unit operating. Internal Note. Central Electricity Generating Board, RD/L/N 46/75, 13 pp.Google Scholar
Spencer, J. F. 1983. Temperature and hydrographic characteristics of the CW discharge canal from Kingsnorth Power Station to the River Medway Estuary. Internal Report. Central Electricity Research Laboratories. (In the Press.)Google Scholar
Straughan, D. 1980. The impact of shoreline thermal discharge on rocky intertidal biota. Southern California Edison Company Research and Development Series, 81-RD-3, 74 pp.Google Scholar
Talmage, S. S. & Coutant, C. C. 1980. Thermal effects (literature review). Journal of the Water Pollution Control Federation, 52, 1575–1616.Google Scholar
Van Den Broek, W. 1978. Dietary habits offish populations in the lower Medway Estuary. Journal of Fish Biology, 13, 645–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walters, G. J. 1977. An Ecological Study of Hydrobia ulvae (Pennant) in the Medway Estuary, Including the Possible Influence of Power-station Warm-water Effluent. Ph.D. Thesis, University of London.Google Scholar
Warriner, J. E. & Brehmer, M. L. 1966. The effects of thermal effluents on marine organisms. Air and Water Pollution International Journal, 10, 277–289.Google Scholar
Warwick, R. M. & Buchanan, J. B. 1970. The meiofauna off the coast of Northumberland. I. The structure of the nematode population. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 50, 129–146.Google Scholar
Wharfe, J. R. 1975. A study of the intertidal macrofauna around the BP Refinery (Kent) Limited. Environmental Pollution, 9, 1–12.Google Scholar
Wharfe, J. R. 1977a. An ecological survey of the benthic invertebrate macrofauna of the lower Medway Estuary, Kent. Journal of Animal Ecology, 46, 93–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wharfe, J. R. 1977b. The intertidal sedimentation habitats of the lower Medway Estuary, Kent. Environmental Pollution, 13, 79–92.Google Scholar
Wharfe, J. R. & Van Den Broek, W. 1978. Chlorinated hydrocarbons in macroinvertebrates and fish from the lower Medway Estuary, Kent. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 9, 77–79.Google Scholar
Wildish, D. J. 1970. A preliminary account of the ecology of the Medway Estuary. Transactions of the Kent Field Club, 3, 237–246.Google Scholar