Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T16:20:46.141Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Applying stock indicators for assessment of a recreational surf clam (Donax deltoides) fishery in Victoria, Australia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2012

Zac Lewis ,
Khageswor Giri ,
Vincent L. Versace  and
Carol Scarpaci
Zac Lewis*
Affiliation:
Unit of Ecology and Sustainability, School of Engineering and Science, Victoria University, PO BOX 14428, Melbourne Victoria 8001, Australia Fisheries Research Branch, Department of Primary Industries, 2A Bellarine Hwy, Queenscliff, Victoria 3226, Australia
Khageswor Giri
Affiliation:
Fisheries Research Branch, Department of Primary Industries, 2A Bellarine Hwy, Queenscliff, Victoria 3226, Australia Biometrics Unit, Future Farming Systems Research Division, Department of Primary Industries, Werribee, Victoria 3030, Australia
Vincent L. Versace
Affiliation:
School of Information Systems, Deakin University, PO BOX 423 Warrnambool, Victoria 3280, Australia
Carol Scarpaci
Affiliation:
Unit of Ecology and Sustainability, School of Engineering and Science, Victoria University, PO BOX 14428, Melbourne Victoria 8001, Australia
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: Zac Lewis, Unit of Ecology and Sustainability, School of Engineering and Science, Victoria University, PO BOX 14428, Melbourne Victoria 8001, Australia email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The aim of this study was to apply indicators for monitoring the impacts of harvest in a recreational surf clam fishery. We investigated trends in abundance, biomass and size structure and proportion of sexual maturity for the pipi (Donax deltoides) in Venus Bay, Australia. The surf clam stock was sampled during the peak harvesting season in the Australian summer (November to February) at four sites exposed to varying degrees of recreational harvest. Sampling was based on three transects at each site; with 0.027 m3 (0.3 m × 0.3 m × 0.3 m) quadrats stratified within transects by tidal position. Restricted maximum likelihood mixed model analyses were used to examine fixed effect combinations after including a priori random effect for transect within site. Results demonstrated that relative abundance varied significantly (P = 0.0090) among sampling months but not among sites. Relative abundance declined across the peak summer harvest season. The proportion of maturity varied significantly (P = 0.00026) among sites whereas relative biomass varied significantly (P = 0.0043) among months by sites. Relative biomass and the proportion of maturity were considerably higher at the site exposed to minimal harvest compared to other sites. This study demonstrates that a suite of indictors including biomass, size–frequency and proportion of maturity are likely to provide a more accurate assessment of stock status in recreationally fished surf clam populations, than relative abundance. This highlights the need to develop methods to estimate relative biomass in surf clam populations that are not exploited commercially.

Keywords

fisheries managementrecreational harvestbivalvepipicockle
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 93 , Issue 5 , August 2013 , pp. 1381 - 1387
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ansell, A. (1983) The biology of the genus Donax. In McLachlan, A. and Erasmus, T (eds) Sandy beaches as ecosystems. Volume 1. The Hague: W Junk, pp. 607–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bridge, N. and Conron, S. (2010) State-wide angler fishing diary program. Recreational Fishing Grant Program Final Report, Fisheries Victoria.Google Scholar
Cooke, S. and Cowx, I. (2004) The role of recreational fishing in global fish crises. Bioscience 54, 857–859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooke, S. and Cowx, I. (2006) Contrasting recreational and commercial fishing: searching for common issues to promote unified conservation of fisheries resources and aquatic environments. Biological Conservation 128, 93–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de la Huz, R., Lastra, M. and López, J. (2002) The influence of sediment grain size on burrowing, growth and metabolism of Donax trunculus L. (Bivalvia: Donacidae). Journal of Sea Research 47, 85–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Defeo, O. and De Alva, A. (1995) Effects of human activities on long-term trends in sandy beach populations: the wedge clam Donax hanleyanus in Uruguay. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 123(1–3), 73–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delgado, E. and Defeo, O. (2007) Tisular and population level responses to habitat harshness in sandy beaches: the reproductive strategy of Donax hanleyanus. Marine Biology 152, 919–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenberg, P.B. and Roy, K. (2008) Ecological and evolutionary consequences of size-selective harvesting: how much do we know? Molecular Ecology 17, 209–220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferguson, G. and Mayfield, S. (2006) The South Australian Goolwa cockle (Donax deltoides) fishery. Report Series 150, South Australian Research and Development Institute, pp. 1–30.Google Scholar
Fisheries, Victoria (2010) Fisheries Notice 6/2009. In Victorian Government Gazette. Melbourne: Department of Primary Industries.Google Scholar
Hacking, N. (1998) Macrofaunal community structure of beaches in northern New South Wales, Australia. Marine and Freshwater Research 49, 47–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartill, B., Cryer, M. and Morrison, M. (2005) Estimates of biomass, sustainable yield, and harvest: neither necessary nor sufficient for the management of non-commercial urban intertidal shellfish fisheries. Fisheries Research 71, 209–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, G. and Lyle, J. (2003) The national recreational and indegenous fishing survey. FRDC Project 99/158, Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry.Google Scholar
James, R. (1999) Cusps and pipis on a sandy ocean beach in New South Wales. Australian Ecology 24, 587–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, R. and Fairweather, P. (1995) Comparison of rapid methods for sampling the pipi, Donax deltoides (Bivalvia: Donacidae), on sandy ocean beaches. Marine and Freshwater Research 46, 1093–1099.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, R. and Fairweather, P. (1996) Spatial variation of intertidal macrofauna on a sandy ocean beach in Australia. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 43, 81–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaramillo, E., Pino, M., Filun, L. and Gonzalez, M. (1994) Longshore distribution of Mesodesma donacium (Bivalvia: Mesodesmatidae) on a sandy beach of the south of Chile. Veliger 37, 192–200.Google Scholar
Johnson, K.D. and Smee, D.L. (2012) Size matters for risk assessment and resource allocation in bivalves. Marine Ecology Progress Series 462, 103–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, M.G. (1976) The life history of the Goolwa cockle Donax (Plebidonax) deltoides (Bivalvia: Donacidae), on an ocean beach, South Australia. Fisheries Internal Report, Fisheries Branch, South Australian Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
McLachlan, A., Dugan, J., Defeo, O., Ansell, A., Hubbard, D., Jaramillo, E. and Penchaszadeh, P. (1996) Beach clam fisheries. Oceanography and Marine Biology: an Annual Review 34, 163–232.Google Scholar
Murray-Jones, S. (1999) Towards conservation and management in a variable environment: The surf clam Donax deltoides. University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.Google Scholar
Murray-Jones, S. and Ayre, D. (1997) High levels of gene flow in the surf bivalve Donax deltoides (Bivalvia: Donacidae) on the east coast of Australia. Marine Biology 128, 83–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray-Jones, S. and Johnson, J. (2003) Goolwa cockle (Donax deltoides). South Australian Fisheries Assesment Series 2002/21, South Australian Research and Development Institute, pp. 1–56.Google Scholar
Murray-Jones, S. and Steffe, A. (2000) A comparison between the commercial and recreational fisheries of the surf clam, Donax deltoides. Fisheries Research 44, 219–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlacher, T., Schoeman, D., Dugan, J., Lastra, M., Jones, A., Scapini, F. and McLachlan, A. (2008) Sandy beach ecosystems: key features, sampling issues, management challenges and climate change impacts. Marine Ecology 29, 70–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoeman, D. (1996) An assessment of a recreational beach clam fishery: current fishing pressure and opinions regarding the initiation of a commercial clam harvest. South African Journal of Wildlife Research 26, 160–170.Google Scholar
Versace, V.L., Matthews, T.G., Miller, A.D., Bowie, K., Ierodiaconou, D., Mills, D. and Lewis, Z. (2011) A preliminary assessment of the abundance, size and population genetic structure of pipis (Donax deltoides), with specific reference to south west Victoria. Recreational Fishing Grants Program Research Report, Victoria Department of Primary Industries.Google Scholar
Zeichen, M., Agnesi, S., Mariani, A., Maccaroni, A. and Ardizzone, G. (2002) Biology and population dynamics of Donax trunculus L. (Bivalvia: Donacidae) in the South Adriatic coast (Italy). Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 54, 971–982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar