Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T04:50:42.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Anatomy of Respiratory Structures in the Dorid Nudibranchs, Onchidoris Bilamellata and Archidoris Pseudoargus, With Details Of The Epidermal Glands

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Geoffrey W. Potts
Affiliation:
The Laboratory, Marine Biological Association, Citadel Hill, Plymouth

Extract

The respiratory function of the naked body of sea slugs (Opisthobranchia) has long been recognized. The gross anatomy of the gills of dorid nudibranchs was first published by Hancock & Embleton (1852) and was later revised and corrected by Eliot in 1910 in his supplement to the Ray Society monograph by Alder & Hancock (1845–55). Herdman (1890) and Rao (1936) give histological details, but do not seriously add to the understanding of the function of dorid gills or their circulation system. While the gill ciliation of bivalves (Atkins, 1938) and prosobranchs (Yonge, 1947) has been thoroughly examined this is not so in dorid nudibranchs and only the ciliation of the notaspid Pleurobranchus membranaceus has been described in any detail (Thompson & Slinn, 1959; Thompson, 1976) and the dorsal mantle of some dorids (Kress, 1981). Much of the general anatomy of opisthobranchs is reviewed by Hoffman (1939).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agersborg, H. P. K., 1923. The morphology of the nudibranchiate mollusk, Melibe leonina (Gould). Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science, 67, 507592.Google Scholar
Alder, J. & Hancock, A., 1845–1855. A Monograph of the British Nudibranchiate Mollusca. London: Ray Society.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkins, D., 1938. On the ciliary mechanisms and interrelationship of lamellibranchs. VIII. Latero-frontal cilia and their phylogenetic value. Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science, 80, 345436.Google Scholar
Baba, K., 1937. Contributions to the knowledge of a nudibranch Okadeia elegans Baba. Japanese Journal of Zoology, 8, 147190.Google Scholar
Baker, J. R., 1958. Principles of Biological Microtechnique. A study of Fixation and Dyeing, xv, 357 pp. London: Methuen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bethe, A., 1934. Die Salz- und Wasser-Permeabilität der Körperoberflächen verschiedener Seetiere in ihrem gegenseitigen Verhältnis. Pflügers Archiv für die gesamte Physiologie des Menschen und der Tiere, 234, 629644.Google Scholar
Bethe, A. & Berger, E., 1931. Variationen in Mineralbestand verschiedener Blutarten. Pflügers Archiv für die gesamte Physiologie des Menschen und der Tiere, 227, 571584.Google Scholar
Campion, M., 1961. The structure and function of the cutaneous glands of Helix aspersa. Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science, 102, 195216.Google Scholar
Edmunds, M., 1968. Acid secretion in some species of Doridacea (Mollusca, Nudibranchia). Proceedings of the Malacological Society of London, 38, 121133.Google Scholar
Eliot, C., 1910. A Monograph of the British Nudibranchiate Mollusca with figures of the species. Part VIII (Supplementary). 198 pp. London: Ray Society.Google Scholar
Evans, T. J., 1914. The anatomy of a new species Bathydoris and the affinities of the genus: Scottish National Antarctic Expedition. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 50, 191209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, P. H., 1892. Recherches anatomiques sur un mollusque nudibranche appartenant au genre Corambe. Bulletin scientifique de la France et de la Belgique, 23, 358374.Google Scholar
Fretter, V., 1943. Studies in the functional morphology and embryology of Onchidella celtica (Forbes and Hanley) and their bearings on its relationships. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 25, 685720.Google Scholar
Fretter, V., 1946. The pedal sucker and anal gland of some British Stenoglossa. Proceedings of the Malacological Society of London, 27, 126130.Google Scholar
Fretter, V. & Graham, A., 1954. Observations on the opisthobranch mollusc Actaeon tornatilis (L.). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 33, 565585.Google Scholar
Fretter, V. & Graham, A., 1962. British Prosobranch Molluscs: Their Functional Anatomy and Ecology. 755 pp. London: Ray Society.Google Scholar
Gonor, J. J., 1961. Observations on the biology of Lobiger serradifalci, a shelled saccoglossan opisthobranch from the Mediterranean. Vie et milieu, 8, 381403.Google Scholar
Graham, A., 1957. The molluscan skin with special reference to the prosobranchs. Proceedings of the Malacological Society of London, 32, 135144.Google Scholar
Gurr, G. T., 1952. Biological Staining Methods, 5th ed.116 pp. London: Gurr.Google Scholar
Hancock, A. & Embleton, D., 1852. On the anatomy of Doris. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 142, 207252.Google Scholar
Hecht, E., 1896. Contributions à l'étude des nudibranches. Mémoires de la Société zoologique de France, 8, 539711.Google Scholar
Herdman, W. A., 1890. On the structure and functions of the cerata or dorsal processes of some nudibranchiate mollusca. Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science, 31, 4163.Google Scholar
Hoffman, H., 1939. Opisthobranchia. In Bronn's Klassen und Ordnungen des Tierreichs, vol. 3. Mollusca. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Joyeux-Laffuie, J., 1882. Organisation et développement de l'Onchidie. Archives de zoologie expérimental et générale, 10, 225254.Google Scholar
Kress, A., 1981. A scanning electron microscope study of notum structures in some dorid nudibranchs (Gastropoda: Opisthobranchia). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 61, 177191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krogh, A., 1939. Osmotic Regulation in Aquatic Animals. 242 pp. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mccance, R. A. & Masters, M., 1938. The chemical composition and the acid base balance of Archidoris britannica. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 22, 273279.Google Scholar
Owen, G., 1955. Use of propylene phenoxetol as a relaxing agent. Nature, London, 175, 434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, G. & Steedman, H. F., 1958. Preservation of Molluscs. Proceedings of the Malacologica Society of London, 33, 101103.Google Scholar
Pantin, C. F. A., 1959. Notes on Microscopical Techniques for Zoologists. 79 pp. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pearse, A. G. E., 1960. Histochemistry: Theoretical and Applied, 2nd ed.263 pp. London: J. & A. Churchill.Google Scholar
Rao, K. P., 1936. The morphology of Kalinga ornata (Aid. & Han.). Record of the Indian Museum, 38, 4179.Google Scholar
Steedman, H. F., 1950. Alcian blue 8GS: a new strain for mucin. Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science, 91, 477479.Google Scholar
Thompson, T. E., 1960 a. Defensive acid-secretion in marine gastropods. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 39, 115122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, T. E., 1960 b. Defensive adaptations in opisthobranchs. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 39, 123134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, T. E., 1962. Studies on the ontogeny of Tritonia hombergi Cuvier (Gastropoda, Opisthobronchia). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society (B), 245, 171218.Google Scholar
Thompson, T. E., 1976. Biology of Opisthobranch Molluscs, vol. 1. 207 pp. London: Ray Society.Google Scholar
Thompson, T. E. & Slinn, D. J., 1959. On the biology of the opisthobranch Pleurobranchus membranaceus. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 38, 507524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trinchese, S., 1884. Per la fauna marittima Italiena Aeolidiae e famiglie affine. Atti del'Accademia delle scienze fissiche e matematiche e naturali, 3, 11.Google Scholar
Yonge, C. M., 1947. The pallial organs in the aspidobranch Gastropoda and their evolution throughout the Mollusca. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society (B), 232, 443518.Google Scholar