Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T05:30:31.841Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Allozymic Characterization of Scottish and Aegean Populations of Nephrops Norvegicus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Marco Passamonti ,
Barbara Mantovani ,
Valerio Scali  and
Carlo Froglia
Marco Passamonti
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Biologia Evoluzionistica Sperimentale, Universita di Bologna, via Selmi 3, 40126 Bologna, Italy.
Barbara Mantovani
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Biologia Evoluzionistica Sperimentale, Universita di Bologna, via Selmi 3, 40126 Bologna, Italy.
Valerio Scali
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Biologia Evoluzionistica Sperimentale, Universita di Bologna, via Selmi 3, 40126 Bologna, Italy.
Carlo Froglia
Affiliation:
CNR - IRPEM, Molo Mandracchio, 60125 Ancona, Italy
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

One Scottish and two Aegean samples of Nephrops norvegicus (Crustacea: Decapoda) were allozymically tested using a total of 110 individuals and compared with two already characterized Adriatic populations. Three main characteristics of their genetic structure emerge: a highly homogeneous allele pattern, a strong heterozygote deficiency at some loci and a significant genotypic variance among populations, mainly caused by the Pgm locus. Population subdivision, intraunit inbreeding, bottlenecks and selective constraints are taken into account to allow for these genetic features, although none of them proved decisive. The search for straightforward characters differentiating Norway lobsters of geographically different areas proved unsuccessful, although a significant genotypic differentiation was noticed among our samples. Observed D values among the geographically distant samples indicate a very low genetic divergence, so that no clear phyletic conclusions can be traced on the sole allozyme-gene analysis.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 77 , Issue 3 , August 1997 , pp. 727 - 735
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ayala, F.J., Powell, J.R., Tracey, M.L., Mouráo, C.A. & Perez-Salas, S., 1972. Enzyme variability in the Drosophilia willistoni group. IV. Genetic variation in natural populations of Drosophilia willistoni. Genetics, 70, 113–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonnell, M.L. & Selander, R.K., 1974. Elephant seals: genetic variation and near extinction. Science, New York, 184, 908–909.Google Scholar
Chapman, C.J. & Howard, F.G., 1988. Environmental influences on Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) populations and their implications for fishery management. In Aspects of decapod crustacean biology. Symposia of the Zoological Society of London (ed. A.A, Fincham and P.S., Rainbow), 59, pp. 343–345. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Chu, K.H., Lee, S.C. & Tsoi, S.C.M., 1990. Enzyme polymorphism in three species of Metanephrops (Decapoda, Nephropidae) from Taiwan. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology, 18, 555–558.Google Scholar
Elston, R.C. & Forthofer, R., 1977. Testing for Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium in small samples. Biometrics, 33, 536–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, A., 1980. Biochemical systematics and evolution. Glasgow: Blackie & Son Ltd.Google Scholar
Froglia, C. & Gramitto, M.E., 1981. Summary of biological parameters on the Norway lobster Nephrops norvegicus (L.) in the Adriatic. FAO Fisheries Report, 253, 156–178.Google Scholar
Froglia, C. & Gramitto, M.E., 1987. An estimate of growth and mortality parameters for Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) in the central Adriatic Sea. FAO Fisheries Report, 394, 189–203.Google Scholar
Hedgecock, D., Tracey, M.L. & Nelson, K., 1982. Genetics. In The biology of Crustacea. Vol. 2. Embryology, morphology and genetics (ed. L.G., Abele), pp. 283–403. New York Academic Press.Google Scholar
Holthuis, L.B., 1945. Remarks on Nephrops norvegicus (L.) and its variety meridionalis Zariquiey. Zoologische Mededelingen, 25, 317–320.Google Scholar
Holthuis, L.B., 1991. FAO species catalogue. Vol. 13. Marine lobsters of the world. An annotated and illustrated catalogue of species of interest to fisheries known to date. FAO Fisheries Synopsis, 125(13), 1–292.Google Scholar
IMBC, UMBS & IRPEM, 1994. Nephrops norvegicus: stock variability and assessment in relation to fishing pressure and environmental factors. Final report to the Commission of the European Communities, contract XIV-l/MED/91/003, from the Institute of Marine Biology of Crete (IMBC), the University Marine Biological Station Millport, Scotland (UMBS) and the Instituto di Richerche sulla Pesca Marittima, Ancona (IRPEM), 84 pp.Google Scholar
International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 1992. Biochemical nomenclature and related documents: a compendium, 2nd ed. (prepared for the Committe of Editors of Biochemical Journals by C. Liebecg), pp. 1–134. London: Portland Press.Google Scholar
Karl, S.A. & Avise, J.C., 1992. Balancing selection at allozyme loci in oysters: implications from nuclear RFLPs. Science, New York, 256, 100–102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levene, H., 1949. On a matching problem arising in genetics. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 20, 91–94.Google Scholar
Mantovani, B. & Scali, V., 1992. Allozyme characterization of the Norway lobster, Nephrops norvegicus, of two Adriatic trawling grounds. Ada Adriatica, 33, 209–213.Google Scholar
Meera, Khan P., 1971. Enzyme electrophoresis on cellulose acetate gel: zymogram patterns in man-mouse and man-Chinese hamster somatic cell hybrids. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, 145, 470–483.Google Scholar
Meera, Khan P., Rijken, H., Wijnen, J.T., Wijnen, L.M.M. & Boer, L.E.M. de, 1982. Red cell enzyme variation in the orang utan: electrophoretic characterization of 45 enzyme systems in Cellogel. In The orang utan. Its biology and conservation (ed. L.E.M., De Boer), pp. 61–108. The Hague: W. Junk.Google Scholar
Nei, M., 1972. Genetic distance between populations. American Naturalist, 106, 283–292.Google Scholar
Nei, M., 1987. Molecular evolutionary genetics. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selander, R.K., Smith, M.H., Yang, S.Y., Johnson, W.E, & Gentry, J.B., 1971. Biochemical polymorphism and systematics in the genus Peromyscus. I. Variation in the old-field mouse (Peromyscus polionotus). Studies on Genetics VI, 7103, 49–90. [University of Texas Publications.]Google Scholar
Tracey, M.L., Nelson, K., Hedgecock, D., Shleser, R.A. & Pressick, M.L., 1975. Biochemical genetics of lobsters: genetic variation and the structure of American lobster (Homarus americanus) populations. Journal of fisheries Research Board Canada, 32, 2091–2101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tully, O. & Hillis, J.P., 1995. Causes and spatial scales of variability in population structure of Nephrops norvegicus (L.) in the Irish Sea. Fisheries Research, 21, 329–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Someren, H., Van Henegouwen, H.B., Los, W., Wurzer-Figurelli, E., Doppert, B., Vervloet, M. & Meera, Khan P., 1974. Enzyme electrophoresis on cellulose acetate gel. II. Zymogram patterns in man-Chinese hamster somatic cell hybrids. Humangenetik, 25, 189–201.Google ScholarPubMed
Ward, R.D., Skibinski, D.O.F. & Woodwark, M., 1992. Protein heterozygosity, protein structure, and taxonomic differentiation. Evolutionary Biology, 26, 73–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weir, B.S., 1990. Genetic data analysis. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Publishers.Google Scholar
Weir, B.S. & Cockerham, C.C., 1984. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution, 38, 1358–1370.Google Scholar
Zariquiey, Cenarro R., 1935. Crustaceos del Mediterraneo (Decapodos Macruros). Nephrops norvegicus, Linne, var. meridionalis. Buttleti Institucion Catalana Historia Natural, 35, 26–32.Google Scholar