Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T17:15:37.694Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

ON A QUESTION OF MORDELL AND A SPECTRUM OF LINEAR FORMS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2001

EDWARD B. BURGER
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Williams College, Williamstown, MA 01267, USA; [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Let L1(x), L2(x), …, LN(x) be N real linear forms in N variables defined by

formula here

such that the associated N × N matrix of coefficients C = (cmn) is unimodular. In the classical theory of geometry of numbers, Minkowski's well-known linear forms theorem asserts that for any positive numbers ε1, ε2, …, εN satisfying ε1, ε2, …, εN [ges ] 1, there exists a lattice point p ∈ ℤN, p0, such that

formula here

In 1937, Mordell [7] posed the following question which may be viewed, in some sense, as a converse to Minkowski's result. Does there exist a constant ΔN such that for each N × N unimodular real matrix C, there exist positive real numbers ε1, ε2, …, εN satisfying

formula here

such that the only integer solution to the inequalities of (1.1) is p = 0? Moreover, if ΔN does exist, what is the best possible value for ΔN, that is, what is the supremum of all such admissible values of ΔN? Clearly, by Minkowski's theorem, if ΔN exists, then ΔN < 1.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
The London Mathematical Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)