Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T01:14:22.659Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Voiceless Nasal Phonemes in Icelandic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 February 2009

Michael Jessen  and
Magnús Pétursson
Michael Jessen
Affiliation:
Institut für Maschinelle Sprachverarbeitung, University of Stuttgart, Azenbergstraße 12, D-70174 Stuttgart, Germany
Magnús Pétursson
Affiliation:
Institut für Phonetik, Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft und Indogermanistik, University of Hamburg, Bogenallee 11, D-20144 Hamburg, Germany
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Icelandic has a number of ‘surface minimal pairs’ between voiced and voiceless nasals. Facts and arguments are presented that speak for the phonemic status of these sounds, in contrast to the widespread view that voiceless nasals in Icelandic are derived. It is shown, among else, that stops after voiced and voiceless nasals are phonetically identical. Due to this fact it is not possible on synchronic grounds to ascribe the distinction between voiced and voiceless nasals to a distinction among the following stops, unless phonological abstractness is used as an analytical tool. The rarely mentioned case of single word-initial voiced versus voiceless nasals (where no subsequent stop occurs) would require an even greater commitment to phonological abstractness if the derived status of voiceless nasals were maintained. Implications for linguistic phonetics and the IPA are discussed.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the International Phonetic Association , Volume 28 , Issue 1-2 , June 1998 , pp. 43 - 53
Copyright
Copyright © Journal of the International Phonetic Association 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Árnason, K. (1986). The segmental and suprasegmental status of preaspiration in Modern Icelandic. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 9, 1–23.Google Scholar
Barry, W.J. and Künzel, H.J. (1978). A note on the devoicing of nasals. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 8, 47–55.Google Scholar
Bladon, R.A.W. and Al-Bamerni, A. (1976). Coarticulation resistance in Englih/l/ Journal of Phonetics 4, 137–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borowsky, T. (1993). On the word level. In Hargus, S. and Kaisse, E.M. (editors), Phonetics and Phonology 4: Studies in Lexical Phonology, 199–234. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Browman, C.P. and Goldstein, L. (1986). Towards an articulatory phonology. Phonology Yearbook 3, 219–252.Google Scholar
Einarsson, S. (1927). Beiträge zur Phonetik der isländischen Sprache. Oslo: Brödggers Boktrykkeri.Google Scholar
Haugen, E. (1958). The phonemics of Modern Icelandic. Language 34, 55–88.Google Scholar
Hall, T.A. (1992). Syllable Structure and Syllable-Related Processes in German. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Hoole, P. (1987). Velar and glottal activity in a speaker of Icelandic. Proceedings of the 11th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Vol. 3, 31–34.Google Scholar
Jónsson, J.G. (1994). The feature [asp] in Icelandic phonology. Studia Linguistica 48, 28–45.Google Scholar
Kenstowicz, M. and Kisseberth, M. (1979). Generative Phonology. Orlando: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kenstowicz, M. (1994). Phonology in Generative Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Klatt, D.K. (1975). Voice onset time, frication, and aspiration in word-initial consonant clusters. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 18, 686–706.Google Scholar
Kress, B. (1937). Die Laute des modernen Isländischen. Institut für Lautforschung: Berlin.Google Scholar
Lass, R. (1984). Phonology. An Introduction to Basic Concepts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, P. (1971). Preliminaries to Linguistic Phonetics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, P. (1997). Linguistic phonetic descriptions. In Hardcastle, W.J. and Laver, J. (editors), The Handbook of Phonetic Sciences, 589–618. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, P. and Maddieson, I. (1996). The Sounds of the World's Languages. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Orešnik, J. (1972). Four modern Icelandic devoicing rules. Linguistica 12, 137–156.Google Scholar
Pétursson, M. (1973). Phonologie des consonnes nasales en islandais moderne. La Linguistique 9, 115–138.Google Scholar
Pétursson, M. (1976). Aspiration et activité glottale. Examen expérimental à partir de consonnes islandaises. Phonetica 33, 169–198.Google Scholar
Pétursson, M. (1981). Velumtätigkeit bei der Erzeugung stimmhafter und stimmloser Nasalkonsonanten im Isländischen. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 4, 19–28.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, J. (1990). Phonological and phonetic representation. Journal of Phonetics 18, 375–394.Google Scholar
Stevens, K.N., Blumstein, S.E., Glicksman, L., Burton, M. and Kurowski, K. (1992). Acoustic and perceptual characteristics of voicing in fricatives and fricative clusters. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 91, 2979–3000.Google Scholar
Thráinsson, H. (1978a). On the phonology of Icelandic preaspiration. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 1, 3–54.Google Scholar
Thráinsson, H. (1978b). Dialectal variation in Icelandic as evidence for aspiration theories. In Weinstock, J. (editor), The Nordic Languages and Modern Linguistics 3, 533–544. Austin: University of Texas.Google Scholar
Thráinsson, H. (1980). Sonorant devoicing at Lake Mývatn. In Hovdhaugen, E. (editor), The Nordic Languages and Modern Linguistics 4, 355–364. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Wiese, R. (1996). The Phonology of German. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zue, V.W. (1976). Acoustic Characteristics of Stop Consonants: a Controlled Study. [1980 by Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club].Google Scholar