Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T16:25:37.775Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A suggested revision for the Cardinal Vowel system

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 February 2009

J. Derrick McClure
Affiliation:
(University of Ottawa)

Extract

The Daniel Jones Cardinal Vowel system, defined as it is by clear-cut and rigid rules, is part of the stock-in-trade of all IPA phoneticians. I wish to suggest that the present format of the system contains a contradiction so basic that any attempt to make use of it as a descriptive technique, in all but a very restricted number of cases, would be completely impossible. This contradiction, moreover, is so obvious that the fact that no phonetician has called attention to it until now is hard to explain, and the equally certain fact that descriptive phoneticians (including the present writer) regularly teach the use of the technique to students, and apply it themselves, is even more so.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Journal of the International Phonetic Association 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abercrombie, D. (1967). Elements of general phonetics. Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, P. (1967a). ‘The nature of vowel quality,’ in Three areas of experimental phonetics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, P. (1967b). Linguistic phonetics. UCLA Working Paper in Phonetics.Google Scholar