Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T01:10:41.891Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Revisions to the VoQS system for the transcription of voice quality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2017

Martin J. Ball ,
John H. Esling  and
B. Craig Dickson
Martin J. Ball
Affiliation:
Linköping University, [email protected]
John H. Esling
Affiliation:
University of Victoria, British Columbia, [email protected]
B. Craig Dickson
Affiliation:
University of Victoria, British Columbia, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The ‘voice quality symbols’ (VoQS) transcription system for voice quality was introduced some 20 years ago, and no major revision has been undertaken since then. In this account we describe the first major revision of the VoQS chart, these changes being mostly in the form of additions to the section on phonation types, but include also changes to the layout of the supralaryngeal settings section. These reflect recent developments in the understanding of the physiological underpinnings of sounds produced in the larynx including certain phonation types.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the International Phonetic Association , Volume 48 , Issue 2 , August 2018 , pp. 165 - 171
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © International Phonetic Association 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ball, Martin J., Esling, John H. & Craig Dickson, B.. 1995. The VoQS system for the transcription of voice quality. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 25, 71–80.Google Scholar
Ball, Martin J., Esling, John H. & Craig Dickson, B.. 2000. Transcription of voice. In Raymond, D. Kent & Ball, Martin J. (eds.), Voice quality measurement, 49–58. San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing.Google Scholar
Ball, Martin J., Howard, Sara & Miller, Kirk. Revisions to the extIPA chart. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, doi:10.1017/S0025100317000147. Published online by Cambridge University Press, 13 April 2017.Google Scholar
Ball, Martin J. & Müller, Nicole. 2005. Phonetics for communication disorders. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Catford, J. C. 1964. Phonation types: The classification of some laryngeal components of speech production. In Abercrombie, David, Fry, Dennis B., MacCarthy, Peter A. D., Scott, N. C. & Trim, John L. M. (eds.), In honour of Daniel Jones, 26–37. London: Longmans, Green & Co. Ltd.Google Scholar
Duckworth, Martin, Allen, George, Hardcastle, William & Ball, Martin J.. 1990. Extensions to the International Phonetic Alphabet for the transcription of atypical speech. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 4, 273–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esling, John H. 2005. There are no back vowels: The laryngeal articulator model. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 50, 13–44.Google Scholar
Esling, John H. & Harris, Jimmy G.. 2005. States of the glottis: An articulatory phonetic model based on laryngoscopic observations. In Hardcastle, William J. & Beck, Janet (eds.), A figure of speech: A Festschrift for John Laver, 347–383. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter & Johnson, Keith. 2015. A course in phonetics, 7th edn. Stamford, CT: Cengage.Google Scholar
Laver, John. 1980. The phonetic description of voice quality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moisik, Scott, Esling, John H. & Crevier-Buchman, Lise. 2010. A high-speed laryngoscopic investigation of aryepiglottic trilling. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 127, 1548–1558.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Müller, Nicole (ed.). 2006. Multilayered transcription. San Diego, CA: Plural Publishers.Google Scholar
Warner, Thomas & Bressman, Susan (eds.). 2007. Clinical diagnosis and management of dystonia. London: Informa Healthcare.Google Scholar